• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Microsoft: PS4 won't make us change "anything" with Xbox One [ummm]

Perhaps anecdotal, but GS pre-order numbers indicate 2 things.

Demand is higher for PS4 right now and X1 has supply issues.

MS has 5 months to turn that around.
 
You called it innovation. It's not. Sony has a system for digital delivery, and it's all software right? they can do the very same lending and resale model, under the same inflexible (that's what it is) system if so desired. So why was this the focus of MS's X1 strategy?

To hope we would not see that the perceived advantages are not new, not more flexible, not really unique and can be implemented by a competitor quite easily.

This is for EA and the other publishers everything else is dressing, ways to make you forget that it's all for profit.

Sony doesn't have a digital store to satisfy buying, selling, trading, gifting, renting, etc. Nobody does, but as things go all digital consumers will expect those kinds of things. MS didn't have a focus that they conveyed well outside of the all-in-one entertainment box, but if you look at the business side of that it's clear MS wants to be your all-in-one digital retailer.

Of course competitors could all do it. Competitors can and have copied iTunes, Steam, Live, and other software services. There is an advantage to being first and MS believes that's where they need to be.

I have no idea if it's the right thing to do, and I'm not even necessarily agreeing with it. I am, however, very curious to see how it all plays out.

Every business is in it for the money. Even Sony.
 
Good, great. Hopefully a game, set and match really quick then. I kind of started hating Microsoft after around 2007 or so when they started getting really arrogant and cocky, didn't give two flips about their outages, charged tons of money or made gaming on their system stupidly expensive for anyone who got a launch core or has a 20GB hdd. Don't get me wrong, I am happy they added support for thumb drives, but its not quite enough when you only have an extra 16GB or whatever. And to buy their 120 or 250 GB hdd was kind of crazy expensive for a machine I didn't have a ton of interest in using anymore (mostly due to how costly Live! was, pushing avatars, twitter, facebook, system kept getting slower with every update, huge game patches now and now following own rules, ect).

I do hate how the blu-ray association has made everything HDMI input only. We do have other TV's that maybe are a little older either at friends or up north that don't quite have HDMI on them yet, so the PS4 will basically be un-usable for anything really any older than 2006.
 
Titanfall is a very nice game, but :

1-It's not a launch title
2-You can play it on you PC
3-You can play it on you X360
4-This game have HIGH chance to appear on PS4

Mr Nelson just try to set the thing right, but most of the time he only worst the situation.
 
Titanfall is a very nice game, but :

1-It's not a launch title
2-You can play it on you PC
3-You can play it on you X360
4-This game have HIGH chance to appear on PS4

Mr Nelson just try to set the thing right, but most of the time he only worst the situation.

It's not launch but that doesn't matter. As a platform holder you want big exclusives to hit around six months to a year after the console has been on the shelves.

At that point you have a steady supply I consoles and a higher install base.
 
Major doubling down on that "go fuck yourself, San Diego" angle, huh?

ir3WwQl8vXtoa.gif

I thought for a second that was a huge zit on his face
 
it’s safe to say that we’re confident where we’re going. We’re also confident that gamers are going to love our vision of the future and what we’re going to offer for gaming

Yup. We sure do love it. No problems here. Nope. What? I can't hear you! *covers ears* LALALALALALALALA
 
Microsoft: "OMG PEOPLE CALM DOWN ! WE DO WHATEVER YOU GUYS ASK ! YOU ASKED FOR GAMES DIDN'T YA !? WELL WE BROUGHT GAMES WITH US ! EVEN IF MANY OF THEM AREN'T AVAILABLE AT LAUNCH ! HERE ! *shoves games into the faces*"

Microsoft is being happy with a limited number of new IPs/exclusives it brought. Sony brought new exclusives all over the PS3 era while MS laid back and enjoyed on the money brought by multi-platform games.
 
3xwGp9t.gif


Also, you guys are just screaming 'arrogant, arrogant, arrogant'. What? Why? Because they are confident in their product? Because they dont bow to your whims and admit that what they're doing is awful and the worst thing ever?.

because they sound like assholes that don't give a shit what their customers think of their crappy policies.
 
If you get out of your mother's basement and look around you'll notice the general public are quite aware of the Xbox One issues, more so than I have seen in any previous generation of hardware. It's also being covered in local papers and news media.

There is truth in this. With twitter, youtube, facebook, ect people are far more aware of these things than they ever have been. The value of "word of mouth" has gained tremendously and its very easy for something to become stigmatized -- just look at Windows 8.
 
Sony doesn't have a digital store to satisfy buying, selling, trading, gifting, renting, etc. Nobody does, but as things go all digital consumers will expect those kinds of things. MS didn't have a focus that they conveyed well outside of the all-in-one entertainment box, but if you look at the business side of that it's clear MS wants to be your all-in-one digital retailer.

Of course competitors could all do it. Competitors can and have copied iTunes, Steam, Live, and other software services. There is an advantage to being first and MS believes that's where they need to be.

I have no idea if it's the right thing to do, and I'm not even necessarily agreeing with it. I am, however, very curious to see how it all plays out.

Every business is in it for the money. Even Sony.

PSN has had sharing from day 1. Trading and selling can be implemented easily. If Sony did not have PSN then your argument would have some validation.

It's not really innovation at all. That's the point.

The fact that Sony is in it for the money is obvious. They are abusiness. I own a business I get that.

What's key here, is X1's model was conceived to fix a specific perceived revenue problem not to create a system so ground breaking that consumers would shower them with success.

The innovation of your games in the cloud is secondary to the primary objective..take back the dollars lost through 2nd / 3rd / 4th sale.

Let's not pretend otherwise.
 
ir3WwQl8vXtoa.gif


Major's body language and attitude reflects nothing to me but that of some arrogant PR man spinning and throwing sales pitches in the face of consumer disapproval. I truly hope they seal their fate with this approach of refusal to acknowledge concerns. It makes me sick.
 
I want to believe, boy I want to, but even some gaffers picking Xbone over PS4 as their console of choice; common folks will get one they're used to.

More people were used to PS2's than Xboxes when the last consoles came out. It didn't stop them from buying Xbox 360s.

If the One and PS4 were the same price or if the One was launching much earlier than the PS4, I could see people just getting it.

But with the higher price and near simultaneous launch plus the One DRM PR disaster affecting a decent portion of the early adopter audience, I think there will be more 360 users switching back to the PS side of things. Not all, but enough for MS to take notice.
 
There is truth in this. With twitter, youtube, facebook, ect people are far more aware of these things than they ever have been. The value of "word of mouth" has gained tremendously and its very easy for something to become stigmatized -- just look at Windows 8.

It's not just Twitter, YouTube, etc. The gripes about the Xbox One have been in the New York Times, Forbes, Reuters, etc. Microsoft's stock has slid since Monday, albeit only just over a point. People outside of gaming are watching because Microsoft has a lot to ride on this. The PC market is slowly diminishing and in turn so is Windows. Microsoft has failed to get a foothold in mobile and tablets. The Xbox One succeeding is a long term play for the preservation of company's relevance. The fact that this play encapsulates far beyond gaming explains why they're giving gamers the finger. Gaming is only a fraction of the Xbox One strategy.
 
ir3WwQl8vXtoa.gif


Major's body language and attitude reflects nothing to me but that of some arrogant PR man spinning and throwing sales pitches in the face of consumer disapproval. I truly hope they seal their fate with this approach of refusal to acknowledge concerns. It makes me sick.

I totally agrere.
 
PSN has had sharing from day 1. Trading and selling can be implemented easily. If Sony did not have PSN then your argument would have some validation.

It's not really innovation at all. That's the point.

The fact that Sony is in it for the money is obvious. They are abusiness. I own a business I get that.

What's key here, is X1's model was conceived to fix a specific perceived revenue problem not to create a system so ground breaking that consumers would shower them with success.

The innovation of your games in the cloud is secondary to the primary objective..take back the dollars lost through 2nd / 3rd / 4th sale.

Let's not pretend otherwise.

I'm not arguing with you that other couldn't do it, but they're currently not. MS isn't even doing it yet (the damn thing is not out) and they're not clear on exactly how they're going to do anything.

I clearly stated MS wants to be the all-in-one digital retailer and that's obviously about money, so do we really need to clarify that every time? They believe there is money lost from used games. Agreed. Agreed. Agreed.

MS pushing forward on things like shared library is new. Yes, Sony made it possible for you to share, but it wasn't a shared library. MS didn't bring something totally original, but they're making something new of it that easier and more accessible. That's innovation. And, just to make sure you're clear, I know that they're implementing such a feature to draw gamers to the platform to *dun dun dun* make more money. If they move forward on really making an all-in-one store for buying, selling, renting, trading, gifting, etc. then that's innovation.

Put down the sword and shield, it's not necessary.
 
Perhaps anecdotal, but GS pre-order numbers indicate 2 things.

Demand is higher for PS4 right now and X1 has supply issues.

MS has 5 months to turn that around.

I dont think they can before launch.
Launching only in 21 countries should be a sign they are supply constrained.
PS4 is doing bonkers in preorder numbers sony can use that given the state the company is in. Makes me wonder if sony can actually deliver so many console.
 
Indeed. If you think moms, dads and Joe Blow are going to pay $500 for this thing with all of the bad press surrounding it, then you have another thing coming. Especially when there will be the $399 PS4 sitting right beside it.

PS4. Cheaper, more powerful, no drm.

Their message is really simple.
 
Also, you guys are just screaming 'arrogant, arrogant, arrogant'. What? Why? Because they are confident in their product? Because they dont bow to your whims and admit that what they're doing is awful and the worst thing ever? I dont know what you guys seriously expect.

Because they continue to make dismissive statements that undermine or minimize people's legitimate concerns and complaints, and they maintain the X1 will sell regardless of the massive twitter backlash, their E3 that didn't go well at all, and the incredibly lopsided post-E3 polls and preorder data.

It's not "confidence", it's outright delusion. They're not, of course, going to admit they fucked up, but they can at least shut the fuck up for a month or two for people to calm down instead of digging themselves deeper with shit like "TITANFALL. 'NUFF SAID", and "NUCLEAR SUBMARINE". That's why people are calling them arrogant.
 
I honestly wasn't blown away with Titan fall...just another shooter Mr Nelson.

I'll be happy to try it out on PC and eventually PS4 since even the devs have stated its not out of the question: Microsoft doesn't own the IP. Plus not a launch title so what exclusives do they have at launch really other than Dead Rising 3?
 
If and when Titanfall does come out on the PS4, I wish EA the best of luck as they try to hawk their $59.99 one year old title, with very minimal advertising, against a $20 Steam version.
 
Perhaps anecdotal, but GS pre-order numbers indicate 2 things.

Demand is higher for PS4 right now and X1 has supply issues.

MS has 5 months to turn that around.

Turn what around? The first is nigh impossible at this point, they are locked in on their policies and on the price. What are they going to do, recant on everything and drop the price? No way that's happening before launch, and it would likely hurt them more than it would help.

And the second, there is little to none indication that the Xbone is supply constrained. That's what MS will say to save face when the pre-order numbers start coming out. All you have to do is look at the largest online retailer in the world, Amazon. You can still buy an Xbone for launch day delivery nearly a week after the reveal. That doesn't look like supply constrained to me. Also, I haven't seen any reports of GS's running out of Xbone pre-orders.
 
Sony doesn't have a digital store to satisfy buying, selling, trading, gifting, renting, etc. Nobody does, but as things go all digital consumers will expect those kinds of things. MS didn't have a focus that they conveyed well outside of the all-in-one entertainment box, but if you look at the business side of that it's clear MS wants to be your all-in-one digital retailer.

Of course competitors could all do it. Competitors can and have copied iTunes, Steam, Live, and other software services. There is an advantage to being first and MS believes that's where they need to be.

I have no idea if it's the right thing to do, and I'm not even necessarily agreeing with it. I am, however, very curious to see how it all plays out.

Every business is in it for the money. Even Sony.

Who says they don't? Sony has been very quiet about its digital policy so far. All we really know is that every PS4 game will be available day one as digital download and that PSN is open to any/all business models. If you look at all the amazing stuff they're doing with Gaikai's technology and the heavy emphasis on social gaming, there is no doubt that Sony sees this as a digital war and is every bit as prepared.
 
If and when Titanfall does come out on the PS4, I wish EA the best of luck as they try to hawk their $59.99 one year old title, with very minimal advertising, against a $20 Steam version.

Yeah screw that. I'm not going to support this game if they are going to sell it to MS only to come back a year later grovelling to the PS4 owners. This thing just looks like a first person Starhawk to me anyway, without even a single player mode like Starhawk.
 
Top Bottom