Garrett 2U
Member
Should have said we believe there is more to games than just graphics, and Kinect 2.0 provides an unparalleled gaming experience.
That's one way to win over the gamers
Should have said we believe there is more to games than just graphics, and Kinect 2.0 provides an unparalleled gaming experience.
You cant, you may need to wait for years even though the PS4 is 50% more powerful, much better designed and makes it far easier to tap into it's power.
MSFT:NACL said:In the end, well let the consoles and their games speak for themselves.
How exactly is the Xbox One architecture balanced?
It looks like a mess to me.
I took that to mean the back'n'forth between MS' own internal PR machines. Clearly the left analog stick doesn't know what the right stick is doing over there.
I said before... dGPU Expansion Pack is the future4MB RAM Expansion Pak confirmed for Xbone to support Hi-Rez graphics.
It is a balance between TV, Windows 8 Metro apps, games, Skype, and being able to quickly switch between them. Microsoft has somewhat given up one of the advantages of a console, that it is a specialized gaming device, for support of more features. It is a gamble that the consumer wants more generality instead of a single purpose devices that excels at one thing.
Microsoft could have been right if it wasn't for one huge blind spot in their vision. The Xbox One costs $500. That is too much for the extra features that they are promoting.
Post that again when the PC is begging for ports.
Xbox One architecture is much more complex than what any single figure can convey
Where is the Cloud power?
original source provided:
http://kotaku.com/report-ps4-is-50-...m_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow
Someone hire this fella now!Should have said we believe there is more to games than just graphics, and Kinect 2.0 provides an unparalleled gaming experience.
Everybody knows it is a post-launch accessory jk
I laughed
Post that again when the PC is begging for ports.
It is a balance between TV, Windows 8 Metro apps, games, Skype, and being able to quickly switch between them. Microsoft has somewhat given up one of the advantages of a console, that it is a specialized gaming device, for support of more features. It is a gamble that the consumer wants more generality instead of a single purpose devices that excels at one thing.
Microsoft could have been right if it wasn't for one huge blind spot in their vision. The Xbox One costs $500. That is too much for the extra features that they are promoting.
I don't think the specs gap is big enough to matter outside of message boards. I expect them to have the same port troubles that PS3 did with Black Ops ports.
Actually Black Ops ports were horrid. MS is fucked if COD is half the frame-rate of the PS4 version.
But if XB1 games runs at 720p-900p versus 1080p on the PS4 and that's the ONLY difference, I think they should be fine as long as they price drop REAL quick.
For an arguably better version of the game? Sure, why not.
Should have said we believe there is more to games than just graphics, and Kinect 2.0 provides an unparalleled gaming experience.
Fans of the system will latch on to any and all possibilities of hope. They're mainly just trying to give their fans blog fodder.I said a few days back, why are MS picking fights regarding system power and such, they just needed to keep quiet and let their game & services do the talking.
But now - now they've picked a fight, and are forced to respond to each article and remark from devs and what not. Meanwhile, Sony focus on their games, with the likes of Evolution Studios communicating directly with gamers and getting people onside.
Yeah and it would be so awesome if a PC anywhere near the budget range of said consoles could do that.
Yeah and it would be so awesome if a PC anywhere near the budget range of said consoles could do that.
Ah, but it is about price as well, as my above comment demonstrates. It's just not so simple.
The PR department should pat itself in the back. It's a pretty good response that neither admits or denies anything.
I think everyone with a PC would agree. But it's not about price. It's about performance.
In summary:
Microsoft: "Nuh uh!"
Oh man brilliant and very true though.
Bad comparison.
Think about it: it's pretty much impossible to get along in the world without a computer. A good PC will cost you $500-600 minimum. The price of a console is, say $400.
If you buy an $900-1000 PC (which can do pretty much any game better than a console), then you have essentially just integrated the console into your PC while still getting a better experience.
+ the cheaper games, you are actually saving money by going the PC route.
Bad comparison.
Think about it: it's pretty much impossible to get along in the world without a computer. A good PC will cost you $500-600 minimum. The price of a console is, say $400.
If you buy an $900-1000 PC (which can do pretty much any game better than a console), then you have essentially just integrated the console into your PC while still getting a better experience.
+ the cheaper games, you are actually saving money by going the PC route.
"We'll let the games speak for themselves until we feel like going onto forums and spreading FUD about the clear specs advantage our competitor has".
Post that again when the PC is begging for ports.
Post that again when PS4/Xbox are begging for a 1080p resolution in BF4 and other games.
I hope the guys do not mean it seriously.