Grimmy said:Good luck to Microsoft, but I have just five words: FINAL FANTASY: THE SPIRITS WITHIN. Thank you.
Um, there's a lot about Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within that you need to talk about before comparing it with ANY other movie.
Grimmy said:Good luck to Microsoft, but I have just five words: FINAL FANTASY: THE SPIRITS WITHIN. Thank you.
jett said:When Peter Jackson won an oscar(i'm not sure if it was that or at the golden globes) for best director he sarcastically thanked the Weinsteins(Miramax's ex head honchos) for all their support. The look on Bob Weinstein when the camera cut to him = teh priceless.
Grimmy said:There's no need - the two films have the most important things in common, and that is:
GINORMOUS budget with unproven directors for video game franchises. Sheer stupidity and utter folly. Video game movies should proves themselves with new technology, smaller budgets and good scripts, not the other way round by asking you to dump money into the river. Looks like studios are finally getting smarter.
I'm so glad I don't need to greenlight such crap for work.
Apaprently so is HALO now, unless you can divulge more about this mysterious financing studio. If it's Paramount, well, good luck. You'll need it. And if it's Warner, then they obviously haven't learned from this summer's fiasco.Stinkles said:Um, FF was made by game designers and writers and independently financed by Square.
Stinkles said:Our movie will be made by film makers and with financing and distribution from a yet to be announced movie studio. It will be made with a good script by a competent movie screenplay writer and the visualization and design will be done by WETA. It will be produced by Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, who are both notriously budget conscious. It will be deirected by a plainly talented film maker."
Stinkles said:There is NO comparison. You're flailing and contradicting yourself. One of your early points was that Asia doesn't care about Halo, yet you directly compared it with FF, which Asia does care about.
Stinkles said:And you don't have the first clue what the Halo movie budget is. You simply decided it was "enormous"
Grimmy said:Apaprently so is HALO now,
Stinkles said:Oh, ok, so what you're saying is that it is impossible to make a good movie that is successful. And that any movie costing over $45M is doomed? My bad.
CosmicGroinPull said:Microsoft, I only have this to say to you:
Scarlett Johansson as Cortana, in nothing but body paint = WIN WIN WIN
usea said:Okay, somebody help me out here. I've been ignoring Halo hype for a few years because I thought it would fade away. I honestly have no idea what makes the franchise so endearing and compelling to people. Both games are easily two of the worst shooters I've played in a long time. The story is horrible, the characters are laughably stupid, the weapons are pathetic, and the level design in shooters 10 years ago was better. The only thing I liked was the shield system.
Who seriously expects to enjoy even a big-budget Halo movie? Why do people like the games so much?
usea said:Okay, somebody help me out here. I've been ignoring Halo hype for a few years because I thought it would fade away. I honestly have no idea what makes the franchise so endearing and compelling to people. Both games are easily two of the worst shooters I've played in a long time. The story is horrible, the characters are laughably stupid, the weapons are pathetic, and the level design in shooters 10 years ago was better. The only thing I liked was the shield system.
Who seriously expects to enjoy even a big-budget Halo movie? Why do people like the games so much?
usea said:Okay, somebody help me out here. I've been ignoring Halo hype for a few years because I thought it would fade away. I honestly have no idea what makes the franchise so endearing and compelling to people. Both games are easily two of the worst shooters I've played in a long time. The story is horrible, the characters are laughably stupid, the weapons are pathetic, and the level design in shooters 10 years ago was better. The only thing I liked was the shield system.
Who seriously expects to enjoy even a big-budget Halo movie? Why do people like the games so much?
usea said:Okay, somebody help me out here. I've been ignoring Halo hype for a few years because I thought it would fade away. I honestly have no idea what makes the franchise so endearing and compelling to people. Both games are easily two of the worst shooters I've played in a long time. The story is horrible, the characters are laughably stupid, the weapons are pathetic, and the level design in shooters 10 years ago was better. The only thing I liked was the shield system.
Who seriously expects to enjoy even a big-budget Halo movie? Why do people like the games so much?
Seriously, frequently threads pop up on GAF that have Halo love and hate. You never entered one of those and read a few posts?usea said:Okay, somebody help me out here. I've been ignoring Halo hype for a few years because I thought it would fade away. I honestly have no idea what makes the franchise so endearing and compelling to people. Both games are easily two of the worst shooters I've played in a long time. The story is horrible, the characters are laughably stupid, the weapons are pathetic, and the level design in shooters 10 years ago was better. The only thing I liked was the shield system.
Who seriously expects to enjoy even a big-budget Halo movie? Why do people like the games so much?
Grimmy said:Like I said though, I'm lucky that I actually LIKE the stuff I greenlight
usea said:Who seriously expects to enjoy even a big-budget Halo movie? Why do people like the games so much?
Tieno said:Seriously, frequently threads pop up on GAF that have Halo love and hate. You never entered one of those and read a few posts?
Speevy said:Maybe some of the people who helped make it the most successful and highly acclaimed first person shooter of this generation, or perhaps some of the folks that made it the most successful online console game of all time?
Nope. Like I said, I had been avoiding it (in denial). This thread is interesting though. I should have avoiding asking that question in a thread that isn't directly related though.Tieno said:Seriously, frequently threads pop up on GAF that have Halo love and hate. You never entered one of those and read a few posts?
I don't follow. How are those not valid reasons for expecting a movie to be bad?perryfarrell said:It's one thing to hate the game. It's another thing to think this movie is a bad idea because the Halo universe is not very compelling in terms of story and characters.
Stinkles said:Did you read my reply? We are not writing it, directing it, doing preproduction, post-production or distributing it.
Hint: He is Frankie.jett said:You work at MS?
I think you're forgetting the marines in Halo Wars.border said:I think a part of the problem is that none of the characters in the game have a really charismatic hook that's going to appeal to a wide audience. Master Chief constantly wears a mask and the rest are all military stereotypes. The most lively person is a computer AI. I gotta assume they're putting in some supporting characters and at least couple women. Studios probably wanted a love interest for Master Chief
Grimmy said:I'll leave you to figure out, but here's two incredibly talented and cool people I work with:
1. Chinese. Sunglasses.
2. Silver-haired. Ohio native.
woxel1 said:That's still not enough to make the film worthwhile. Throwing a lot of money at the problem - that not enough people can be trusted to see this movie - won't make it go away. Halo: The Movie will need a big name star and licensed songs on the soundtrack, at least. I'm not saying that's what anyone at Bungie or MS wants, but it's a reality of Hollywood filmmaking.
I asked why. There has to be a reason people feel the way they do. Opinions aren't magic.Proelite said:OUCH! My IQ just plummeted into my cranium! :lol :lol :lol
Edit: Look up opinions in the dictionary.
Proelite said:Hint: He is Frankie.
Star Wars featured Peter Cushing as its biggest-name actor.
Proelite said:Lol, the events surrounding the halo movie is eerily similar to the events that occurred before LOTR. All we need is a studio like New Line to see the need for 3 halo movies,
Stinkles said:Seriously - just tell us about the amazing blockbusters you personally greenlit.
usea said:I asked why. There has to be a reason people feel the way they do. Opinions aren't magic.
Grimmy said:Who said I greenlight blockbusters? I never did. I work on actually GOOD films - you know, stuff that actually has substance and not more excuse to market video game (or any other types of properties) brands. You know, stuff that wins in Cannes or Venice or Berlin. Stuff that don't cost more than $20 mil yet are fan-freakin'-tastic and I don't have to sell my soul to work on.
And it you don't respect that then tough for you. I LOVE what I do.
usea said:I don't follow. How are those not valid reasons for expecting a movie to be bad?
Then list some of the stuff that you greenlit and won at Cannes or Venice or Berlin! No need to be ashamed about what you love to do and that won such prestigious awards. You have me intrigued!Grimmy said:Who said I greenlight blockbusters? I never did. I work on actually GOOD films - you know, stuff that actually has substance and not more excuse to market video game (or any other types of properties) brands. You know, stuff that wins in Cannes or Venice or Berlin. Stuff that don't cost more than $20 mil yet are fan-freakin'-tastic and I don't have to sell my soul to work on.
And it you don't respect that then tough for you. I LOVE what I do.
It's not a matter of "opinion." I'm not talking about what makes a good movie. I'm saying people will automatically see a movie directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Tom Cruise. Do you really disagree with that? It's not an opinion, it's a fact. It will happen. If there's a popular IP great, but Spielberg has made numerous ludicrously successful films not based on ANY preexisting IP, so how do you explain that?Pseudo judo said:That's where we disagree I guess. I'm of the opinion that the IP is the foundation of interest in these movies and the attachments like Spielberg and Tom Cruise add a certain level of legetimicy to the hope that, in the end, the IP will end up turning into a good movie.
Halo, imo, is in a different league in this regarde. Most Halo fans, to which there are obviously millions, will see the movie regardless of who's making it. Just to see how well they turned their beloved franchise into a movie or to see how much they've butchered it. Attachements like Peter Jackson just validate the hope that the movie will be good, as well as selling the idea that it may be good to people who have heard of Halo, are getting wrapped up in the hype, want to see a big budget Hollywood movie, and believe that Peter Jackson will deliver.
perryfarrell said:Actually, I agree with you. I think the movie will suck, because noone wants to see the adventures of a green dude w/ a motorcycle helmet.
CarlosX360 said:I also think that people are forgetting DOOM, its a sci-fi movie, but still sold well, because it had The Rock in it. It even had a Xbox demo in the DVD for christ's sakes!
Stinkles said:I didn't say I didn't respect it. I just asked you to demonstrate. If the movies you personally greenlit are so awesome, then tell the forum what they are. I can't imagine why they'd be secret.
Doom made $28 million in the USA, less than half of its budget.I also think that people are forgetting DOOM, its a sci-fi movie, but still sold well, because it had The Rock in it.
Well, suffice to say that it wasn't a success, but it did sell some tickets, and some DVD's. Did it not? Right, I thought so.jett said:
border said:Chinese + Sunglasses = Wong Kar Wai
Halo probably won't be as good as Chungking Express, but so few things are.
Doom made $28 million in the USA, less than half of its budget.