Spoken like a person who know how it's like to receive 50-60% score on Metacritic with their first party games.
Oh, wait.
https://powerup-gaming.com/2018/04/05/microsoft-marketing-exclusive-borderlands-anthem/Is MS the partner for marketing on this?
Report – Microsoft has exclusive marketing rights to Borderlands 3, Anthem and more
Yes Microsoft has the marketing rights for anthem also have bundles with the gameIs MS the partner for marketing on this?
Bingo!Yeah I mean in the span of a week:
- the crackdown 3 reviews
-rumors that Nintendo may resurrect a game they cancelled
-anthem apparently not being all that great and having a big marketing deal with it
-and a terrible January NPD result,
Its not surprising to see xbox execs in hysterics and having meltdowns.
https://powerup-gaming.com/2018/04/05/microsoft-marketing-exclusive-borderlands-anthem/
Found this, I don't know how correct it is, back from April, take with grain of salt.
They need to stick the game back in the fire. I'm really fearful that EA will just dump the game like they did with Mass Effect Andromeda.
the game mechanic in question is not well-explained by the game itself and a lot of people who have played the game have corroborated that.Seems like he is picking on something that IS an actual issue. Game reviewers not knowing what the fuck they are doing in a game that they are reviewing, subsequently docking the game for their own lack of knowledge or ability. IGN podcasts and reviews are full of this shit, as are others.
However, Ybarra should stfu in this case...heads of companies should not be talking about this stuff...we should.
I don’t know man. I can understand the tumultuous Destiny 2 launch. The Taken king imo was fantastic and the other expansion At the end was ok I hear. So going from that to 2 was kinda shit.Amazed at the whining? Meanwhile, people are amazed at how unfinished this thing is. This is a fully priced game that is... out for some people now, right? And soon for everyone else? That's bonkers. The sheer arrogance in his statement is hilarious when you realise that by fixing the problem, they have in fact shortened the length of a game which is already far too short for its style and caliber.
Frankly, this whole thing is kinda embarrassing. Hearing Gerstmann tear it a new one today really put it in perspective - not saying his word is gospel, but his sentiments are echoed throughout plenty of other reviews that I've read since, and my 3ish hours of experience in the demo lines up too. As expected, there are huge, fundamental issues with the retail product that cannot be rectified with simple patches. Not only does it need a lot of support and content going forward, but it's gonna have to be really good, and importantly free, to keep people interested once better games start coming out.
Actually what he is talking about is a gaming issue and it is not explained ingame... so reviewers or us gamers doesn't have to know what is not told to you.Seems like he is picking on something that IS an actual issue. Game reviewers not knowing what the fuck they are doing in a game that they are reviewing, subsequently docking the game for their own lack of knowledge or ability. IGN podcasts and reviews are full of this shit, as are others.
However, Ybarra should stfu in this case...heads of companies should not be talking about this stuff...we should.
Is MS the partner for marketing on this?
Jumpforce, Fallout 76, Just cause 4, BFV, Anthem... They seem to know how to pick their games for e3.
WHOA! Who is picking the games over there?
That is, unless it's the game's fault, e.g. by having shit controls.Yeah, if you can't do basic move sets in the game, you have no business writing a review of the game.
Well be fair its not like MS can pick and choose who they partner with. Theyre down 2:1 world wide, completely dead in continental Europe and Asia. I think one of the reasons dude is in such a panic is because Anthem represents and is the quintessential "Xbox" game experience MS has been pushing lately. An always online, Games as a service, coop adventure with friends. Its the type of game MS has bet the farm on going into the future and is one of the premiere studios MS has trusted in the past. And its falling flat on its face, in terms of reviews at least.
Andromeda was still "just" a singleplayer RPG, they could have just dump it easily without major consequences (and they did)...Anthem is a game as a service, they can still be profitable with little effort thanks to the microtransactions
Andromeda was not just a single player RPG. There was multiplayer, shallow as it was, that also had microtransactions. It greatly mirrored Mass Effect 3's multiplayer, just with Andromeda's mobility. So your point is pretty much null and void from that point on.
Will you belive me if I say I totally forgot there was a multiplayer mode there?
Will you belive me if I say I totally forgot there was a multiplayer mode there?
While I don't necessarily disagree, this feels more like Crackdown venting and using Anthem as an excuse.
Oh jeez. Totally forgot Jumpforce was at their press conference. Nearly all of those games are a turd in some respect. No wonder Ybarra is leaking sodium.Jumpforce, Fallout 76, Just cause 4, BFV, Anthem... They seem to know how to pick their games for e3.
He's effectively whining how his company backed the wrong horse...I'm sure if they didn't have the marketing deal...
.......never mind.
Ya know I generally like Mike, this seems a bit out of character for him. I understand where he's coming from, as the game has a metacritic score prior to the embargo lifting, but at the same time lets be honest. There are things that a day 1 patch just can't fix. The progression design can't be fixed with a day 1 patch. The mission design won't be fixed with a patch. The fact that weapons lack uniqueness and variety such as Destiny's weapons do...won't be fixed with a patch. So what does Mike say after Feb 22nd? Just wait for the first expansion?
Let's face it, Microsoft bet on a lame horse. Sony did the same with Destiny and Destiny 2. Critically, Destiny 2 was a bad game, eventually made better too little too late for a lot of Destiny fans, myself included. One huge difference is the point in which each games flaws were truly realized. Anthem pulled back the curtain on it's semi-finished game with the demo and guarded it with excuses that it was a 6week old build and patches were coming...we know the rest. Destiny was mechanically solid...but people were shocked when they reached the end of the game in vanilla Destiny 1. The backlash was immense, but Activision had made their money. EA will most certainly suffer a different result.
Another huge difference is that we as an audience have had it with these unfinished games at this point in time and Anthem is going to get the brunt of this sentiment. When Destiny released we were more or less just being introduced to the looter shooter genre, leaving only Borderlands 1 and 2 ( complete games) to reference. Many gave it a pass. The content we did eventually get was awesome, though pricey. Anthem is claiming there will be no paid DLC, which for me would warrant a purchase, if the game wasn't so broken.
It's like EA is playing a marketing whack a mole with their games. Solve paid dlc problem, but the game is broken and boring now. Solve the broken problem in Battlefield 5, but now you got SJW BS to deal with and gamers who've all of a sudden become historians of the highest pedigree (I don't agree with criticism of women being featured in a WW2 game). I've gone on a bit of a tangent...after the second paragraph i just let my thoughts spill out onto this post. Sorry if this is unwelcome.
What's weirder is that he didn't do this in defense of a game his corporation published just a week ago. It either shows that the money/stakes in Anthem was a lot higher than Crackdown 3 or EA (behind the scenes) is stressful as fuck to work with.
What's weirder is that he didn't do this in defense of a game his corporation published just a week ago. It either shows that the money/stakes in Anthem was a lot higher than Crackdown 3 or EA (behind the scenes) is stressful as fuck to work with.
toxic suit for a toxic community.
Perhaps the brass at Xbox is feeling a little salty toward reviewers after Crackdown 3 cracked out?
Yes, the multiplayer is quite forgettable.
Which is a shame because Mass Effect 3 had one of the greatest all-time horde modes.
Probably a lot of pent up anger from the crackdown 3 reviews. Now a game they have a big marketing deal with is getting raked over the coals, must be frustrating that everything your company does either goes to shit or severely under performs. Microsft has had like the anti midas touch this gen. Every game they've made or partnered with has either out right bombed, severely under performed, or has gone multiplatform for the sequels. It must be infuriating.
It' Twitter. It's humans with too much to say. You'd think a VP would know better. Nope. Time to tweet and get things off my chest like a manchild.This is a bad look for the VP of Xbox. A high level executive doing a petty tweet about a "reviewer." Makes him look like an ass and would he say the same thing to "reviewers" of bad Xbox games?
With the exception of Forza Horizon, I agree with you about everything else (and one series out of everything is still horrible). They do seem to have the reverse Midas touch this generation. I'm not quite sure why that is either - they can't seem to back the right games no matter how hard they try.