dammitmattt
Banned
iceatcs said:I know, hurt innit?
I never know what you are trying to say. Do you have your own special brand of English that you use?
iceatcs said:I know, hurt innit?
Annoy innit?dammitmattt said:I never know what you are trying to say. Do you have your own special brand of English that you use?
Raide said:Wow, is this the CoD4 Thread of Time Travel? I am sure I have heard these complaints before and I think COD4 just about survived. :lol
Meier said:Speaking of XXXp's, I was kind of shocked that inFAMOUS only runs at 720p. Regarding the OP, I think everyone can feel pretty confident that it will look great either way.
Dra-Q said:
Big timeFersis said:You know what would be awesome ?:
UNCHARTED 2 Renders at 599p confirmed.
That my friends would be e-drama all around.
Wollan said:So they did nothing besides add some pre-defined item destrucion (which were already plenty in COD4).
Seeing the E3 footage it looked *exactly* like COD4. I would like for them to release yesterdays MP footage in 720p (or 600p) though I guess there is no need.
It looks like COD4 which is okay today. I think it plays superb (COD4) but it's dissappointing that they didn't use the income from 14 million(!) sold games to enhance the graphics.
iceatcs said:I do give a shit
Annoy innit?
I would pay some bucks if arne says it.iceatcs said:Big time
bs, that .gif isn't 720p at all.hamzik said:Notice that this gif is courtesy of ESPN HD.
Well, I do know that innit is slang for isn't it, but the grammar in his posts is usually pretty terrible. I always chalked it up to him not being a native English speaker and it being his second or third language or something.dammitmattt said:Using make believe words and poor grammar is not cool. And it's never been cool.
Fersis said:You know what would be awesome ?:
UNCHARTED 2 Renders at 599p confirmed.
That my friends would be e-drama all around.
Meier said:Speaking of XXXp's, I was kind of shocked that inFAMOUS only runs at 720p.
dammitmattt said:I hate GAF sometimes.
dammitmattt said:Using make believe words and poor grammar is not cool. And it's never been cool.
that's weak. It will far much worse esp both sides.kamorra said:You mean like the e-drama in this thread?
iceatcs said:that's weak. It will far much worse esp both sides.
Well, I just meant when I booted it up and my TV switched resolutions from 1080p, I was surprised that it did not run in it (just started last week). I don't think the jaggies are too bad...haven't really noticed them to be honest -- pop-in happens at times, but fairly minimally.Mohonky said:You were shocked it only ran at 720p? Are you shitting me? It looks like an utter jag fest in places. I wouldn't have been surprised if it was running below 720p. Even for 720p it looks jagged.
Gaogaogao said:
iceatsc said:that's weak. It will far much worse esp both sides.
Not really there are 4 sides in there.kamorra said:Well there is only one side in this thread.
Im poor LOLRez said:everyone should just buy a nice PC and bitch less
this forum would be so much brighter
Grammar nazis are like the pixel counters of life. THEY SUCK! :loldammitmattt said:There's bad grammar and then there's such a blatant disregard for grammar that it's impossible to tell what someone is saying. This second label applies for every single iceatsc post.
Rottweiler said::lol @ Activision
:lol @ Infinity Ward
:lol @ First Person Shooters
OK. I'm with DeaconKnowledge.swerve said:Higher resolution != more fun.
This!Haunted said:Tell that to the people bitching about the Wii's 480p!
Dedalus said:Bahahaha, I love my PC, 1920x1200 at 60fps for me
*cough*
iceatcs said:Not really there are 4 sides in there.
dammitmattt, I don't give a fuck. I know you know me that I'm Deaf. Stop follow me.
To be honest the same can really be said about framerate as long as its function.Roxas said:Only 0.01% of the people who will buy this game give a shit about the resolution.
I don't know, I'm a pretty flexible guy. If you'll recall earlier, I wrote a little diddy about not giving a shit.TheHeretic said:Graphics only matter to the point whatever the posters console of choice is capable of. Wii owners claim graphics don't equal more fun, Xbox and PS fans claim better graphics make more fun up until sub HD resolutions, at which no-one can tell anyway. Of course PC gamers accept no compromises, thats why we always win.
I think image quality is harder to appreciate than motion fluidity. A lot of people still don't have a HDTV.Nirolak said:To be honest the same can really be said about framerate as long as its function.
Hell, even when it's not functional. *looks at the last Need For Speed's 5 million sales*
SundaySounds said:Graphics in COD4 were fine. Sounds like there's not gonna be much of a change. So who cares? The gameplay is what matters. I'm not sure I like the sound of being able to use the A321 in multiplayer, though. That just sounds kinda dumb.
Not really a shit framerate would damage the game alot. Many fans wouldn't even realise why, but they'd think the game feels worse.Nirolak said:To be honest the same can really be said about framerate as long as its function.
Hell, even when it's not functional. *looks at the last Need For Speed's 5 million sales*
Fersis said:You know what would be awesome ?:
UNCHARTED 2 Renders at 599p confirmed.
That my friends would be e-drama all around.
Dedalus said:
*cough*
Was that a poem?Itsintheairtonight said:Hd is so overated it makes me sick.
Hd is just resolution. It is such a small part of graphic fidelity. Yet its hailed as the most important feautere.
Resident evil 4, which was one of the best looking games last gen ran at a lower resolution than the average game. Yet it was still one of the best looking games.
same with cod4.
If the choice is lower framerate, lesser geometry, lower quality shader whatever or lower resolution.
Resolution should always be the one to go.