Steppenwolf
Member
wtf man. The Killing and Eyes Wide Shut are both awesome movies.
Blader5489 said:There's nothing particularly remarkable or interesting about The Killing.
Eyes Wide Shut was trite and unnecessarily long.
icarus-daedelus said::lol Awesome. And... I agree.
See, now, everyone loves this movie, but I just can't see it. I found it sleep inducing. Also, it's a totally different film from Pan's Labyrinth, but it's in Spanish, there's a young girl, and both have monsters, so people compare them a lot. I don't get it.
DanielPlainview said:how the fuck can anyone hate Double Indemnity? that movie is perfect.
DanielPlainview said:how the fuck can anyone hate Double Indemnity? that movie is perfect.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:To be fair, I recall Blader saying in the past that he/she is not a huge fan of older films, so he/she is at least pretty consistent in that view.
Dr. Strangelove said:Double Indemnity is a great film but it's far from perfect. I agree with Snowman that Wilder has made many better films. Like The Apartment. <3 <3
Also, The Killing is a damn fine heist film. Not the best, but it's a hell of a lot of fun to watch.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Since Thursday, I have watched (all for the first time):
The Mirror (Andrei Tarkovsky, 1975)
One of the most gorgeous movies that I have ever seen. It's really effective at evoking the sensation of dreams and memories, and I love the way that it switches back and forth between black and white and color. This was actually my first Tarkovsky, which I now think was a mistake because of how personal it seems to be, but I loved watching it just the same.
Band of Outsiders (Jean-Luc Godard, 1964)
It's weird. I like Breathless the most of any of the French New Wave films that I have seen, but for the most part, I like Truffaut's films a lot more than Godard's because they feel more humane to me. Godard was a good director and artist, but for my money, his films have this coldness to them that makes them a little bit off-putting. I did like, it, don't get me wrong; I especially liked the deconstructive aspects of it (like the way the dancing scene played with the sound by letting the music fade in and out so that the narration could come in), and as usual, the crazy editing choices made by French New Wave directors in many of their films continues to excite me. Overall, though, I was somewhat apathetic toward this movie, though I do understand why Tarantino is such a big fan of it.
Touch of Evil (Orson Welles, 1958)
Visually, this movie is a masterpiece. The opening shot is, of course, deservedly famous for how well-conceived and executed it is, but even beyond that, I love the unity of the film's visual style; the ascending and descending crane camera was a very effective way to shoot this film, as it allows you to get drawn into the tale while simultaneously giving you moments to step back and breathe for a minute while you try and piece together what's happening. The script is also damn good, and Welles is his usual fantastic self; the man was a genius behind the camera, for sure, but he also had an undeniable screen presence (and due to his tendency toward cerebral, intellectual acting, is a personal idol of mine). Where the film loses me a bit is in the inherent silliness of having Charlton Heston playing a Mexican; in addition, I feel like the main relationship between Heston and Leigh is a little bit underdeveloped.. I'm willing to let those slide, however, because of how amazingly the movie is made in every other aspect.
Rashomon (Akira Kurosawa, 1950)
I love the shit out of most of this movie. The acting, cinematography, and design of the film are all top-notch (though the acting tends more toward the over-the-top, heavily stylized acting typical of some of Kurosawa's historical works). In addition, the fight between Mifune and Ueda is one of the best that I have ever seen in terms of staging and emotion; it is the sort of crude, realistic sword-fighting that George Lucas got very right in the original Star Wars trilogy and then got so very wrong in the prequel trilogy. The ending, however, is not very in the spirit of the film; for me, this films ends with the cynical listener leaving the priest, the woodcutter, and the baby standing under the shelter, left bewildered at the darker side of man's nature. The sappy tag at the end is completely out of the spirit of the movie, in my opinion, and should have been omitted.
The Spirit of the Beehive (Victor Erice, 1973)
Each shot of this film is like a painting; it is a sparse, carefully crafted work and avoids most of the trappings associated with films about children (and manages to turn one, the naivete and gullibility of young children, into an effective plot device). I was not versed in Spanish history prior to this film and thus did not pick up on some of the coded symbolism, but even without that, I think that it's a pretty little tale of a young child's fascination with the mystical and ethereal. The scene where she actually meetsis simultaneously one of the strangest and most beautiful scenes that I have ever seen in a film. I've heard that this film is an influence on Pan's Labyrinth, and I can definitely see it, though I would say that in more objective cinematic terms, this is probably a better film because it manages to do a lot of the same things with a lot less.Frankenstein's monster
The Big Sleep (Howard Hawks, 1946)
It's strange; Bogie was not really much of an actor in terms of his range of expressiveness, but he is still one of the most compelling screen actors because of his distinctive look and perfect timing. He gives a fine performance in this film; it's the sort of performance that he has given in a number of films, but what sets it apart is the strange sort of sexual chemistry that he has with his future wife Lauren Bacall. Overall, I enjoyed it, but it's not something that I see myself revisiting many times in the future, if only because there are other film noirs that I like more.
8 1/2 (Federico Fellini, 1963)
After a few false starts over the last few months, I finally got through this. Man, it's a hell of a film. Fellini just throws everything onto the screen in this one; it veers into every conceivable genre, including just a pinch of sci-fi, and its over-abundant use of symbolism is at once pretentious and completely perfect. Mastroianni is, as usual, perfect; that sly tilting of the glasses is something that I don't think I will ever forget. Honestly, so many things happen in this film that I don't feel qualified to talk about it on a single watch; I'm really not sure what hit me.
A Woman Under the Influence (John Cassavetes, 1974)
Loved this film a hell of a lot. This is my second Cassavetes film, and thus far, I've been supremely impressed by his work. The acting in his films is absolutely spot-on, and I love the way that his characters talk like real people (though he achieves this in a very different way from Robert Altman, who also got realistic dialogue from his actors). The guy at the video store told me when I rented this that it took him 3 years to get through this film because of how hard it is to watch sometime, and though I did not respond to it as viscerally as that, I definitely agree that there are moments when Rowlands's performance is so convincingly unstable that I could not help but wonder aloud, "What the fuck is wrong with this woman?" Peter Falk was also great, and he had, to my mind, a tougher job because he had to create a character that was, in reality, just about as crazy as his wife but who revealed his insanity in less obvious ways. To my mind, Peter Falk's character is much more dangerous that Rowlands's unhinged loon because his problems are much harder to detect and are much more violent than his more showy but ultimately harmless wife's. Wonderful film.
Blader5489 said:Perfectly awful, hur hur hur
No, seriously, I hated it. Dialogue was laughable, and the set-up for the whole film was retarded ("I'm shot and bleeding to death, but instead of making a quick stop to patch myself up, I'm just going to sit here--still shot and bleeding to death--and recount the narrative of my life").
Eyes Wide Shut is anything but trite:lol .Blader5489 said:There's nothing particularly remarkable or interesting about The Killing.
Eyes Wide Shut was trite and unnecessarily long.
Sunset Boulevard is by far his best IMO...Amazing movie, one of my top 20 favorites of all time.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:To be fair, I recall Blader saying in the past that he/she is not a huge fan of older films, so he/she is at least pretty consistent in that view.
Also, Double Indemnity is great, but I don't think that it's anywhere near perfect; I think Wilder made better noir films (Ace in the Hole and Sunset Boulevard being my two favorites of his).
creativity said:My god, what a run of films. How do you survive such an onslaught of awesomeness?
All right, so I'm less thrilled about The Big Sleep and Band of Outsiders, but the rest are just absolutely first rate, and Mirror is one of my all-time favorites. It really is a pleasure to read people's thoughts on films like these.
That's an amazing selection of movies. Your reactions to 8 1/2 and The Mirror... mirror my own when I first saw them. Dazzling movies, but difficult to ingest all at once. They're both so dense that you can't not watch them again, and they get even better the second time around.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Since Thursday, I have watched (all for the first time):
Yes! I'm glad that you loved it as much as I did. It's a movie that stays with you, and I'd place it squarely in my top 10.creativity said:The Crowd, King Vidor, 1928
John Dunbar said:Eyes Wide Shut is Kubrick's best, and easily one of the best films of the 90s. So awesome.
ymmv said:Rope (1948)
This short Hitchcock film (only 75 minutes) only has one location and one murder. Two students murder a friend, shove him in a chest and then invite friends to their party to enjoy the thrill of getting away with murder. Since it's really stage play it's all talk, no action and there's only a few suspenseful scenes. The denouement is weak. The best part of the movie is how Hitchcock upholds the illusion of the movie being done in one single shot.
6/10
Net_Wrecker said:Red Cliff (Original International Version Blu Ray)
Wow. Really, really enjoyed this one. 4 hours and 50 minutes of just epic scene after epic scene. The battles were huge and cut no corners, and the characters were all pretty enjoyable to watch. Some of the war tactics in Part II were especially clever, and one even got a chuckle out of me. The last battle in particular is just incredible. Beautiful movie as well. Been holding out on watching this until I could get my hands on the full version, and I was not let down in the slightest.
Brighton Rock
GurgleBot20 said:I've been watching a lot recently, here were the last three:
The Godfather: Despite it's reputation, I've never seen it until now. And it was great. Everybody gave a wonderful performance, especially Brando. Have to see part II now.
One flew over the Cuckoo's nest: Also enjoyed this one. Jack Nicholson was fun to watch. And the ending surprised me:lolI finally get another Simpson's joke
Duck, you Sucker: I loved all of Sergio Leone's other westerns. I enjoyed this one but it wasn't as great as some of the others. The film had great cinematography like his other films, but the characters weren't as great. Also, the flashbacks could have been handled better in my opinion.
Anyway here's how I'd rank the Sergio Leone Westerns:
1. The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
2. Once upon a time in the West
3. For a Few Dollars More
4. Duck, you Sucker
5. A Fistful of dollars
Although 1 and 2 often change spots.
skads_187 said:finally got around to watching hurt locker. nice movie
little confused as to why it got best picture though, even though it was really good.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Because most people thought that it was the best film out of the ones that were nominated; I didn't (preferred A Serious Man and Inglourious Basterds and Up in the Air), but most did.
wRATH2x said:The Fly
I've dreaded watching this movie. No horror movie ever scared me, ever, except for this. I fucking hate flies and transforming into anything scares the hell out of me, David Cronenberg just couldn't wait to scare the hell out of me. This remake is leaps and bounds better than the Vincent Price original.
I never saw it in full, but I always have seen some scenes from TV. 11 year old Wrath couldn't take it.
The movie is freaking awesome! It really is a great movie that I now dread not watching in full back then(damn you little wrath!). Jeff Goldblum was phenomenal, he went from nerd to jack ass to sympathetic to crazy and done them all well. The jump scares actually made me jump, and the general creepiness of him changing into a fly was disturbing from start to finish.
Awesome movie that I recommend to anyone.