• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Movies you have seen recently?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been tricked by Redbox.

I rented Inglorius Basterds. The kiosk had the right cover and everything.

I'm firing it up in the dvd and it starts out with completely different actors than what I was expecting. I was thinking this was just a Tarentino movie in a movie gimmick. However 30 minutes in, I realize this is a little excessive. This was the original Inglorious Bastards!

How do I even complain?

As an aside, the opening credits were pretty good and I was thinking Tarentino outdid himself!:lol
 
harSon said:

Amazing film, and I can't believe it's all on youtube! So great.

Some recent viewings:

Toute Une Nuit (Akerman)
A minor but oddly absorbing experimental film consisting entirely of what could be scenes excerpted from romance films. A bit too aimless, it gets wearying toward the end.

6.5/10

Pickpocket (Bresson)
I don't know why I've neglected this Bresson film, which now seems to me one of his best. It's the same old Nietzschean Crime & Punishment theme found in so many other films (like Shadow of a Doubt a few posts back), but what elevates it to masterpiece status is the aesthetics. With films like this and L'argent, Bresson pushes to the terminal point of narrative economy, achieves a kind of perfection.

10/10

The Cloud-Capped Star (Ghatak)
I don't know where to begin with the range of techniques found in this film. It seamlessly moves between realism and modernism. The sound is especially interesting. It seems just on the verge of becoming a musical, but the artificial sound effects are constantly surprising and inventive. This is the work of a unique and virtuosic filmmaker. I must see more.

10/10

A Few Kilos of Dates for a Funeral (Salur)
Combines the character-driven comedy of early Jarmusch and the bizarre, dark beauty of Kusturica. In other words, it's nothing like most Iranian films, yet I would confidently put it alongside the best Iranian films of the 2000s. Thanks, Keyvan, for recommending this.

10/10

The Earrings of Madame de ... (Ophuls)
Very impressive in many ways (the terrific fluid camerawork), but I do not think it totally succeeds at being only "superficially superficial," to borrow a phrase from the movie. Too rarely did I see through the opulence and manners any special depth of emotion or thought. So it's fitting, I guess, the entire film is wrapped around a MacGuffin, that superficial but very impressive accessory. To the extent that the film is about superficiality, and Madame's salvation from it, yes, I got it, I think. I just didn't care very much.

8/10

Fury (Lang)
Despite the fascinating idea at its core, this film is heavily compromised not just by its ridiculous, crowd-pleasing ending, but by the many incoherent and implausible details supporting it. I wish this was the film it could have been.

7/10
 
Pickpocket is so amazing. I can't believe that it exists, frankly; a good 10% of it is composed of seemingly repetitive shots of hands doing the act of pickpocketing itself. Of Bresson's work, I've seen Pickpocket and A Man Escaped, which is also great (if a little slow for its 90 minute run time). Au Hasard Balthazar would be very high on my list of things to watch next if the video store next to me had it; as it stands, that is something that is being put off until the summer (along with Tokyo Story).

Speaking of Tokyo Story: is that the best Ozu film to start with, or should I save it for later and watch some of his other works first? If I should watch other works first, which ones would you recommend?
 
JGS said:
I finally saw District 9. I was so ashamed that I hadn't seen it yet. Uhh, it was good but what I'm about to say is going to make it sound like I didn't like it.

I'm a little upset that people who have been complaining about Avatar's predictability did not say the same thing about this movie which was extremely paint by the numbers. In fact, the only suspense was me thinking there was a twist which I anticipated but did not arrive.

From the stereotypical bad guys, big greedy corporate conspiracy, to the no bullets can hit me parts, I've seen this movie many times before. It even had a "cute" baby alien
save the day
just like kids in movies often do. It's also setup perfectly for a sequel.

Maybe if I had seen this movie before I saw Star Trek or Avatar, my view would be different. Or if it had been the only sci-fi movie lf the year. It's my 3rd favorite sci-fi film (I have not seen Moon yet). I think Star Trek should have had it's spot on the nominations.

With that out of the way, I enjoyed the movie quite a bit for what it was and look forward to the sequel.

District 9 was worth watching, but you're right, it's about as stale and formulaic as it gets. It was a huge letdown for me.
 
JGS said:
I finally saw District 9. I was so ashamed that I hadn't seen it yet. Uhh, it was good but what I'm about to say is going to make it sound like I didn't like it.

I'm a little upset that people who have been complaining about Avatar's predictability did not say the same thing about this movie which was extremely paint by the numbers. In fact, the only suspense was me thinking there was a twist which I anticipated but did not arrive.

From the stereotypical bad guys, big greedy corporate conspiracy, to the no bullets can hit me parts, I've seen this movie many times before. It even had a "cute" baby alien
save the day
just like kids in movies often do. It's also setup perfectly for a sequel.

Maybe if I had seen this movie before I saw Star Trek or Avatar, my view would be different. Or if it had been the only sci-fi movie lf the year. It's my 3rd favorite sci-fi film (I have not seen Moon yet). I think Star Trek should have had it's spot on the nominations.

With that out of the way, I enjoyed the movie quite a bit for what it was and look forward to the sequel.
Its the same shit that happened with Dark City and the Matrix.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Pickpocket is so amazing. I can't believe that it exists, frankly; a good 10% of it is composed of seemingly repetitive shots of hands doing the act of pickpocketing itself. Of Bresson's work, I've seen Pickpocket and A Man Escaped, which is also great (if a little slow for its 90 minute run time). Au Hasard Balthazar would be very high on my list of things to watch next if the video store next to me had it; as it stands, that is something that is being put off until the summer (along with Tokyo Story).

Speaking of Tokyo Story: is that the best Ozu film to start with, or should I save it for later and watch some of his other works first? If I should watch other works first, which ones would you recommend?

Yeah, there's really something miraculous about Bresson's style of filmmaking. Balthazar ... is probably my favorite. It's not as minimalistic as even A Man Escaped, but there's a certain sympathy or tenderness about it that really sets it apart. Mouchette, too.

With Ozu, you can probably start anywhere. They're all treasures.
 
I just finished Wild at Heart. Hilarious. A glorious and truly wonderful white trash love story. If I hadn't been shocked into gobsmacked silence I would have laughed myself to death when
the "Good Witch"
appeared at the end.
 
creativity said:
A Few Kilos of Dates for a Funeral (Salur)
Combines the character-driven comedy of early Jarmusch and the bizarre, dark beauty of Kusturica. In other words, it's nothing like most Iranian films, yet I would confidently put it alongside the best Iranian films of the 2000s. Thanks, Keyvan, for recommending this.

10/10

Glad you liked it.
 
Precious - Excellent film, really powerful. Totally deserving of a best picture nod.

An Education - Really good, didn't know anything about it going in, but found it to be a sad story with a satisfying ending. Recognized the teacher from Rushmore in there and Peter Sarsgaard reminds me of too many other actors.

The Blind Side - Blonde Sandra Bullock?! Story was great but didn't know anything going in so I after the beginning thing about
the investigation, I thought it would be a tragic story.
Glad to find out it wasn't.

Sideways - Fantastic, fantastic movie. Paul Giamatti is excellent and Thomas Haden Church made me crack up.
 
ShinAmano said:
Antichrist - Saw it on instant netflix and thought I was getting into some supernatural/demon-type movie...I was wrong.

Seriously one of the most disturbing movies I have ever seen...my eyes have been forever tainted.
It's already on instant? I know what me and the lady friend are watching tonight ;-). This will be my last test, if she can survive this movie, we will get along just swell.
 
ChubbyHuggs said:
In my mind, Unbreakable was his only good movie and I've been waiting for him to make a sequel (shattered dreams).
For me the ending was a let down, because of the text. I would have loved it if it just faded out, giving room for an opening in the sequel.

Yeah, the text was easily the worst part. It just felt so hokey and cheap to end it that way. Especially considering the movie took its sweet time and then to just end it with some text? Meh.
 
been watching more things

The Shop Around the Corner (1940)
this beats the hell out of It's a Wonderful Life in terms of being an old-timey, feel-good christmas classic, and it's just about as effective and affecting as romantic comedies can be. it's a perfect depiction of the friction that can arise between potential lovers because of how alike they are. reminds me of that truthful Hermann Hesse quote: "If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself. What isn't part of ourselves doesn't disturb us." it plays every angle between sad and sweet and nails every one of them.

The Cranes Are Flying (1957)
if there's one thing you can say about Russian filmmakers, it's that they tend to be irreproachable technicians. Soy Cuba was a cinematographic marvel and this one's no different. some of the shots here are beyond incredible and it sets the bar high for personal stories set against the backdrop of a terrible war. Dr. Zhivago is nothing compared to this.

Roma (1972)
no one does nostalgia like Fellini. it's in accordance with the episodic structure of La Dolce Vita and Satyricon and it sets the stage for the very personal Amarcord, but it's still very much its own movie. a very impressionistic vision of 20th century Rome that's both reverential and critical of both the past and the present. the whorehouse and ecclesiastic fashion show scenes are the height of Fellini delirious comedy; the episode in the underground tunnel is one of the most beautiful things he's done. i could watch this man's movies every day.

Celine and Julie Go Boating (1974)
endowed with the spirit of creative collaboration and joyous low-budget experimentation, this is weird, wild and wonderful. most of all it's totally unpredictable. i think it's axiomatic for a good movie to sport good performances but i gotta hand it to the two leading ladies: this is acting taken to another level.


and some rewatches

8 1/2 (1963) (4th viewing)
i have seen this 3 times over the course of two months and it still gets better every time. there is so much happening here that i'm enticed to do some serious reading on it, but i'm holding that off until i've seen it many more times because i love finding out stuff by myself. this time, one of the things i realised is that the kid at the end is wearing the same outfit as young Guido, except for that it's white instead of black, which probably connects to the character of Claudia, who also wears white in Guido's fantasies but black in 'real life'. the dvd has some audio problems which pissed me off and i need to buy a new one but i still sat thru the whole thing because it's just that good. 2+ hours that go by in a heartbeat.

Nashville (2nd viewing)
oooooh man this was even better the second time around. the first time i saw this i was busy trying to keep up with everything that was happening. i guess when you know all the pieces of a puzzle, you start to take a better look at the whole picture. what was a comedy with dramatic elements has now turned into a drama with comedic elements. most of the characters' story arcs are just so sad. and i think this shot is probably the most gorgeous ever filmed.

Letter From an Unknown Woman (1948) (3rd viewing)
this has got to be my second favourite movie. and like my #1 it's haunting and sad without being melodramatic. the first time i saw it i thought it was a great examination of monomaniac love, but it's become more than that with subsequent viewings. it's about two people of lifestyles and mindsets so different that they're not at all compatible, but would have been had the circumstances been just a bit different. there's more to the woman than her longing and there's more to the man than his apathy, but the story never allows for them to show it. i found a great piece of writing that seems to support this and starts off with a great quote by the director that says all the things i want to say about cinema.

"The masters of our profession, Rene Clair or Jean Renoir, for example, Jacques Becker in his late work, or John Ford in many of his early films, in their best moments of "in-sight" transcend both dramatic structure and dialogue, and create a new kind of tension which, I believe, has never existed before in any of the other forms of dramatic expression: the tension of pictoral atmosphere and of shifting images. They have the same impetus and produce the same beauty and excitement that can be found in the pure procession of words in the classical theatre, where logic is thrown overboard, over the footlights, so that it is the sound and rhythm of the words alone which inspire and maintain the spectators' belief in the action. Just as in the theatre the lighting, the set, faithfulness to nature and other incidentals must play a subordinate role to the word, so in films the words, the technology and the technique and the logic of the visible must be secondary to the image, subordinate to the vision containing untold wonders within it, which, in the cinema, can be the bearer of artistic truth."
- Max Ophuls


i have also been meaning to rewatch Once Upon a Time in the West since it's been a few years, but my dvd seems to have gone missing. i hope it'll turn up soon.
 
Last night, I rewatched:

A Serious Man (Joel and Ethan Coen, 2009)

10/10

This is my definition #2 movie of last year, and it's only a hair below my #1 (Basterds). What I loved about this second viewing is how I was able to see just how carefully crafted this movie is in terms of its thematic content, particularly its parallels with the Book of Job. In addition, I saw just how absurd and tragic this man's life is; I almost felt bad for laughing at a guy at such a stressful place in his life, but the absurdity of it made me laugh anyway. In addition, I like the way that Larry's and Sy's car rides are edited together simultaneously; I enjoyed it the first time, but I absolutely loved it this time. And, of course, Michael Stuhlbarg's performance is pitch perfect; the nuances in his facial expressions were exquisite. It's probably my #2 or 3 Coen brothers movie (maybe 4 pending a rewatch of Lebowski, which I have only watched once), but considering how talented they are, that is a huge compliment to them.
 
Staring my March marathon, it's probably not going to be as ambitious as last month considering I'm pretty much recovered from my surgery. I watched these over the last two days:

1. Staten Island (2009) - 6.5 out of 10
Fairly interesting film. It's one of those multiple point of view films in which the character's plots are loosely tied together. It had it's strengths and weaknesses. I felt the first character's story was uninteresting and oddly cheesy considering the characters profession (Mob boss), and Vincent D'Onofrio portrayal of the character was easily the weakest portion of the film. The second and third character (one of which was played by Ethan Hawke) were significantly better and tied together relatively well. It's certainly not the best film of this type but it's certainly worth a watch.

2. The Untouchables (1987) - 7.0 out of 10
Surprisingly enough, I had never seen The Untouchables, unfortunately, I found to be extremely disappointing. I was expecting a lot more from a movie consisting of Brian De Palma, David Mamet and Ennio Morricone. I can't quite explain it but the film came off as too "movie like" if that makes any sense. The first 30-40 minutes of the film are much to light hearted considering the subject matter of the film. While the soundtrack was good, I don't think it synced well with what was happening on screen. And I wasn't to thrilled with De Niro's portrayal of Capone. The latter half of the film was significantly better than the first but not enough to bring up the film as a whole.

3. The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) - 10 out of 10
A real simple tale of the greed of men. The film was tense and Bogart's performance was masterful. I loved it, easily one of my favorite films of all time.
 
Starman (1984, John Carpenter) - Neat sci-fi. Jeff Bridges plays an alien entity that takes the form of a sexy lady's dead husband (his race found the golden disc on Voyager). Very naive and kinda cheesy, but also very entertaining due to Bridges and Karen Allen's tight-fitting jeans. Seems like someone messed up in editing though since there are a lot of weird jumps in the story. 3/5
 
Black Dynamite: Big ass thread on this speactacular pieace of fucking cinema. 9/10

Who cares? Best spread the word bout Black Dynamite.

michael-jai-white-black-dynamite-web2.jpg
 
Scream 2: 5/10 I was flabbergasted by every death scene, somehow everyone managed to do the exact opposite of what they should have done. I had an actual headache after watching this. The first one was much better.

Black Snake Moan: 6.5/10 Decent enough movie, I'm surprised that Sam Jackson practiced enough to become a pretty good guitar player.
 
Siebzehn50 said:
Yeah, the text was easily the worst part. It just felt so hokey and cheap to end it that way. Especially considering the movie took its sweet time and then to just end it with some text? Meh.

It was a very cheap ending, like something out of an autobiography. They freeze frame, text about character to let you know what happens after film and that's when you know they will never revisit the film again.

I always figured though, some short time after, that he'd make a sequel with Bruce Willis' character trying to develop his powers in secret from his family (crazy son) and Mr. Glass would find henchmen to cause trouble for him while he's locked up. Then they'd explore the more average Joe superhero.
 
Cyborg

as much i love the Cannon film group(RIP) and there 80s trash gems but this one is just bad.
Jean Claude Van damme already sucks ass alone but together with uber-shitty "how the hell did I become an actor???" Ralp Möller all hope is lost.
horrible acting, cheap effects, ridiculous costumes and wigs(wtf?), characters almost directly ripped of "Final Fight", terrible fighting scenes and the story seems to be written by a 5 year old kid who played to much video games.

2/10 (2 points for some average looking bare boobs and some crucified people)
 
I watched Zodiac today. It was good but man, did it make 2.5h feel way longer than that. We took an intermission and got snacks because it was so slow going.
 
Watched Rachel Getting Married, it's a good film that's essentially ruined by some very poor editing choices IE: we didn't really need to see 15 entire minutes of the rehersal dinner when the only noteworthy plot point is two minues that happen at the end of it..
 
bjork said:
I watched Zodiac today. It was good but man, did it make 2.5h feel way longer than that. We took an intermission and got snacks because it was so slow going.

I watched Zodiac for the first time yesterday. Loved it, we also broke (at least four times) for cigarettes and popcorn.
 
Alphahawk said:
Watched Rachel Getting Married, it's a good film that's essentially ruined by some very poor editing choices IE: we didn't really need to see 15 entire minutes of the rehersal dinner when the only noteworthy plot point is two minues that happen at the end of it..

I loved seeing so much of the rehearsal dinner. Rachel Getting Married would have been ruined if it had only included stuff that was important to the plot; like a Robert Altman film, it is as much about building a world that surrounds these characters as it is about what happens to the characters. In this film's case, you were meant to be made to feel a part of this wedding, and that's why you are shown plenty of seemingly extraneous things that don't necessarily further the plot but which are entertaining and inclusive.

Rachel Getting Married is definitely in my top 5 of 2008; it's absolutely fantastic.

Edit: And bjork, you crazy. Zodiac is one of the shortest 2.5 hours you can spend with a film.
 
Spider from Mars said:
It's already on instant? I know what me and the lady friend are watching tonight ;-). This will be my last test, if she can survive this movie, we will get along just swell.
Wow...I am assuming you have seen it and she has no idea? Good luck.
 
Alphahawk said:
Watched Rachel Getting Married, it's a good film that's essentially ruined by some very poor editing choices IE: we didn't really need to see 15 entire minutes of the rehersal dinner when the only noteworthy plot point is two minues that happen at the end of it..
i think you might have very much missed the point of the film then
 
ShinAmano said:
Wow...I am assuming you have seen it and she has no idea? Good luck.
Yea, I saw it in an art museum/theater where they have a shitty 50 person theater with a low quality projector that projects onto a screen against a cement wall, perfect setting for that film. This was her first Lars Von Trier film and It was interesting to watch her reactions.
especially during the first act, with the full penetration sex and what not
Other than being a little confused by the overall theme of the film and the last scene, she seemed to enjoy it pretty well, and It was interesting to hear her perspective on the "misogynistic" qualities of the film. I don't know if she really enjoyed it all that much, or if she was just pretending because all real hipsters need to love art house films. We met in a film class so I didn't feel too bad for having her watch this.
 
Figured I'd do the same thing I did in Feb again in March, most likely won't reach 100 this month either but oh well.

1) Spider Man 3 6.0

2) Don't You Forget About Me 8.0

3) Boogeyman 2.0

4) Boogeyman 2 7.0
 
Nearby rental store was going out of business. Had a few decent deals, and when a movie gets cheaper to buy than to rent, I just have to get it. Ended up with Confessions of a Superhero and Man on Wire, which were both recommended in the documentary thread, and The Life and Death of Peter Sellers. I have high hopes for all and I'll post a mini-review as I watch them.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Last night, I rewatched:

A Serious Man (Joel and Ethan Coen, 2009)

10/10

This is my definition #2 movie of last year, and it's only a hair below my #1 (Basterds). What I loved about this second viewing is how I was able to see just how carefully crafted this movie is in terms of its thematic content, particularly its parallels with the Book of Job. In addition, I saw just how absurd and tragic this man's life is; I almost felt bad for laughing at a guy at such a stressful place in his life, but the absurdity of it made me laugh anyway. In addition, I like the way that Larry's and Sy's car rides are edited together simultaneously; I enjoyed it the first time, but I absolutely loved it this time. And, of course, Michael Stuhlbarg's performance is pitch perfect; the nuances in his facial expressions were exquisite. It's probably my #2 or 3 Coen brothers movie (maybe 4 pending a rewatch of Lebowski, which I have only watched once), but considering how talented they are, that is a huge compliment to them.

Yeah, I picked this up on blu-ray and watched it yesterday. Just brilliant, I've already quoted "I'm studying Torah, asshole." three times. I can't wait to rewatch this film, it is as deliciously constructed as anything the Coens have ever made.

Oh, and I love the score. Simple and beautiful.
 
The Lovely Bones - Jesus Christ was this a chore to sit through. Listening to Susie Salmon's breathy voiceovers and trippy music while she was in purgatory was torture. This movie panders to the religious and the romantic, but it failed in both aspects. Especially grating was the kiss at the end of the film between Susie and the moor.

Awful film.
 
bjork said:
I watched Zodiac today. It was good but man, did it make 2.5h feel way longer than that. We took an intermission and got snacks because it was so slow going.

Interesting. I found Zodiac to go by pretty quickly really. I guess I could see how people would find it slow, but I was completely into it on my first viewing. And the person who quoted you taking a break 4 TIMES? That's crazy for a 2 1/2 hour movie. The most I ever pause a movie for a break is once, and that's only the case during extremely long movies. Like Lord of The Rings Extended Editions long.
 
ymmv said:
If the point of the movie was boring viewers to death, then it succeeded brilliantly. Awful movie.

If you were bored by Rachel Getting Married, I don't know what to tell you. It's one of the most beautiful films of the last few years, both in terms of its cinematography and what it has to say about life.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
If you were bored by Rachel Getting Married, I don't know what to tell you. It's one of the most beautiful films of the last few years, both in terms of its cinematography and what it has to say about life.

Cinematography? You mean the constant shaky cam?

Let's just say that opinions on this movie are mixed. Personally I agree with the haters. Nothing happened, many scenes were pointless and interminably long and the movie tells a story that could have been told in far less time. I thought the emperor wore no clothes, you loved the emperor's fashion sense.
 
Net_Wrecker said:
Interesting. I found Zodiac to go by pretty quickly really. I guess I could see how people would find it slow, but I was completely into it on my first viewing. And the person who quoted you taking a break 4 TIMES? That's crazy for a 2 1/2 hour movie. The most I ever pause a movie for a break is once, and that's only the case during extremely long movies. Like Lord of The Rings Extended Editions long.

4 cigarette breaks. I've done the math, it makes perfect sense.

It wasn't so much an issue of the lenght of the film but for the fact that I was in a non-smoking house and I'm hopelessly addicted.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
If you were bored by Rachel Getting Married, I don't know what to tell you. It's one of the most beautiful films of the last few years, both in terms of its cinematography and what it has to say about life.

It's one of my favorite films in the last 5 years. Amazing in every aspect of film making.
 
ymmv said:
Cinematography? You mean the constant shaky cam?

Let's just say that opinions on this movie are mixed. Personally I agree with the haters. Nothing happened, many scenes were pointless and interminably long and the movie tells a story that could have been told in far less time. I thought the emperor wore no clothes, you loved the emperor's fashion sense.

The film was not ABOUT the story, though. The story in the movie is nothing special, really. The movie is about the wedding, which is why it's titled "Rachel Getting Married" instead of something referencing the Anne Hathaway character. That's why there are long, world-building scenes such as the rehearsal dinner; by showing what the wedding is like, you get a better sense for the effect that Anne Hathaway's character is having on the proceedings. In that way, she becomes a force of nature as much as a character. That the wedding itself is so wonderful is icing on the cake.

And yeah, I mean the shaky cam. It made the movie feel very... personal. It wasn't necessarily realistic, but you were given the sense that you were really at that wedding.
It also serves the structure of the film. If you were actually observing this wedding, you wouldn't see only the 'plot points' having to do with Kym's character; you would see EVERYTHING and get snippets of plot mixed in with everything else.
 
The Man From Earth.

I admit I had never heard of this movie until recently, and I saw it had gotten some great reviews and it certainly had an interesting concept. Now that I've seen it I can't say I can see why this movie is so well regarded. It was a fun story, but honestly, the old Twilight Zone episode with basically the same concept was equally as interesinting and that lasted only 25 minutes.

The movie wasn't acted very well, it looked like a made for TV movie and it just had a very cheapfeel to it. They gave away too much at the end of the movie, so it really only works on one level now.

Overall it was a very interesting story that was told, but other than that it's a sub-par movie in every way.
 
Tokyo Story (Yasujiro Ozu, 1953)

10/10

When I started this movie, I thought it was boring. By the end, it was moving at the fastest pace of any movie that I have ever watched (despite having not changed at all, really), and I was crying. I mean, let me get this straight: this movie has existed for nearly 60 years, and we're still making crap like Did You Hear About the Morgans? In this movie you have wonderful, realistic, and relatable characters, beautiful composition, and writing that manages to be very dramatic without ever stepping near the realm of melodrama. This was my first Ozu movie, but it's definitely not my last.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom