Favourite movie of the year so far :lolgutter_trash said:Machete
it exceeded my expectations and I enjoyed allot
reason being Rodriguez has a Hit-or-Miss track record.
Machete = hit
These three interest me (though I've yet to see the first Hatchet), particularly Stake Land. I take it you saw them at some sort of movie festival?sefskillz said:Caught the South Korean revenge flick Bedevilled last night. Loved it, came off like a really good I Spit on Your Grave. Great first movie from the writer/director, looking forward to what comes next.
Stake Land was a pretty good post apocalyptic vampire flick that should gain some mainstream appeal if it can get some attention and a wide enough release. Winning the TIFF Midnight Madness Audience award was probably a good start
Hatchet 2 wasn't as much fun for me as the first one, but the deaths were just as gory and creative. I guess every good slasher needs a sequel to solidify its place, so this is it. Supposedly getting an unrated theatrical release, deserves support for that reason alone imo.
Eh, FUMeliorism said:More like a fundamental flaw in your head amirite guys.
swoon said:I thought people didn't like black dahlia because his mojo was back?
Meh.Dead said:The Blu-Ray is a new Directors Cut, different than the older one. Its a lot closer to the original theatrical cut, restores the original ending, the Clannad song, and other stuff. This new cut is only 2 minutes longer than the theatrical cut.
Im at Fantastic Fest, bunch more ill post on this weekend when I actually have some timeDecado said:These three interest me (though I've yet to see the first Hatchet), particularly Stake Land. I take it you saw them at some sort of movie festival?
Best F13th sequel evar.... Not that it's saying a whole lot, but still. Fucking righteous movie.Friday the 13th Part 4 *** i'll stand up for this film any day of the week. of course it's not as good as the first 2, but it's a much better horror move than 3
ChoklitReign said:I just saw FT13 3 and thought it was a lot better than FT13 2. 2 felt like a rehash of 1 whereas 3 developed the formula that the rest of the sequels would follow, which I liked.
I've seen the "Director's Cut" which actually cut OUT several key moments and some of my favorite lines of dialog ("Some day you and I are going to have a serious disagreement.") I was aghast and will never let go of my theatrical cut VHS tape. The "Definitive" probably means Mann tinkered with it even further.RustyNails said:Has anyone got this?
![]()
Last of the Mohicans is my favorite movie of all time. Hands down, bar none. But I heard this definitive cut butchered some of the more amazing scenes from the movie, especially the chase at the end. I will own this Blu Ray version, but just wanna make sure if what people are saying is true. I also heard that its only 5 minutes longer than theatrical cut.
icarus-daedelus said:So... thumbs up or thumbs down? I think this came highly recommended by White Man before he went off in the wilderness somewhere.
HiResDes said:That was my reaction...It makes you feel like the sicko for watching. The Funny Game is being played on you. One of my top 20 favorite movies of all-time, but this is coming from an absurd Haneke fan.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:High Noon (Fred Zinnemann, 1952)
Probably the very definition of a "meh" film. It's not a film without merit, but it's not particularly good either. Gary Cooper's performance is serviceable, I guess, but every other character and performance is instantly forgettable; it's all stock western that does nothing to distinguish itself from any other movie of the genre. Really, that can be generalized to speak of the whole movie: not particularly bad, but not particularly good, either, and mostly forgettable. In addition, I found the recurring use of "Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling" rather ineffective; it did not do much to accentuate the images on the screen and detracted from them in a number of spots. There is some nice cinematography, of course, but overall, it's simply nothing special. Probably the best moments were the debates between the townspeople over how to handle the Frank Miller situation; those were the only times where the movie strayed into territory that made it distinct from other films of the genre.
This will probably be a more controversial review/blurb, but simply put, this film has almost nothing that individuates it. Though they dealt in very similar imagery/plots, Hawks and Ford are totally distinct from one another, and no person familiar with their filmographies would mistake the work of one for the other. This film, though, has no real identity, and suffers for it.
AlternativeUlster said:You know the film is one of the first films that is supposed to move in real time right? Did you feel its intensity from when Gary Cooper tries to rally up people to help him but no one comes to his aide? I haven't seen the film since my film theory class my freshman year of college but it still haunts me today.
Really? I think Sunset Boulevard is a near flawless masterpiece.Easystride said:Recently found out my local library has a great selection of free DVDs. Watched It's a Wonderful Life, Unforgiven, Dr. Strangelove, and Sunset Boulevard.
I had seen pieces of It's a Wonderful Life before, but for some reason I never watched the whole movie. I believe in the future, it will be a part of my Christmas rotation of movies. Good stuff. Other than that, I enjoyed the other movies, but not as much.
Easystride said:Recently found out my local library has a great selection of free DVDs. Watched It's a Wonderful Life, Unforgiven, Dr. Strangelove, and Sunset Boulevard.
I had seen pieces of It's a Wonderful Life before, but for some reason I never watched the whole movie. I believe in the future, it will be a part of my Christmas rotation of movies. Good stuff. Other than that, I enjoyed the other movies, but not as much.
HiResDes said:Really? I think Sunset Boulevard is a near flawless masterpiece.