Mike M: This was the subject of a small revelation for me. I brought this to my writing group last week, and we had a new member who used to be an editor for a literary magazine who told me that she liked my style, but would have sent me a polite rejection if I had submitted this because there were no stakes in play, making it more of a vignette than a fleshed out story (I subsequently went back and added the bit about Robin fearing that Brad would not pull it off and ruin Madisons birthday to at least attempt to mitigate this). I super appreciated this critique, however, because she articulated exactly what had been lurking in the back of my mind that I considered to be a problem with the story, but was unable to figure out on my own. Ive often found that slice of life stories such as this dont exactly thrill me, and even when theyre well-written they usually dont get my top vote (there are exceptions of course), and I dont particularly enjoy writing them that much (again, with exceptions). And I think its the fact that theres usually nothing at stake is exactly why. I enjoy reading and writing funny, snappy dialogue, but if theres no fail state, theres no tension. Without tension, all you have is slack that never really goes anywhere. I dont know if I would say I succeeded in fixing the story entirely by bolting on the possibility that Brad might fail, but I think I at least improved it.