• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Nicola Sturgeon Brexit statement : Independence Referendum Mk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
From a non-british perspective; seems to be the case that England is a conservative country. Politically, the Scottish have fundamentally different views when it comes to voting. That wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, but it really doesn't look like Scotland's views and votes are considered on a national scale at all.

This alone is a good enough reason to hold a referendum.

It's more a case of civic nationalism, but of course, you'll find some football hooligans and other asshats spouting nonsense.

To no ones surprise Scottish Greens are on board

C6znOZzWsAEfbgl.jpg
 
The SNP are part of the reason for the British left being so weak, though. Firstly just because the left in Scotland has always been a strong intellectual well for Labour Party (I mean, both of the last two Labour Prime Ministers were Scottish), but secondly because the SNP are a great boogeyman for scaring working class British voters in England, who see themselves as British, and therefore see the SNP as a threat to their sense of identity. The SNP complaining about Labour weakness is fundamentally no different to the Conservatives complaining about the NHS weakness - they're the ones contributing to it and are very happy to see the situation continue because the worse it gets, the more they can achieve their ulterior ambitions.

This isn't accurate. This is a rather poor comparison in real terms. The SNP are actively competing against Labour - they are an opposing party within our 'competitive' political landscape. The Tories are careful to say they don't oppose the NHS, which they effectively do on many counts. Of course the SNP sees benefits in terms of Scottish Independence of a weak Labour. Reflecting on that, I do agree there is some doublespeak going on, and that both express sympathy with certain positions even while actively seeking to undermine them.

On the other hand, the weakness of the left is a much bigger issue than just the rise of the SNP. It is to do with a latent conservatism in the general populace that has re-established itself through over half a century of apparent internal stability (from real military conflict) in parallel with gains in real living conditions, the dissolution of place and work-based (guilds, etc.) communities, the rise of the core family unit, a retreat from the complexity of the real world into an increasingly technologically mediated world, etc. The public has become complacent. That doesn't mean I am putting all or even most of the blame on the public for not demanding more social and economic change during a time of such stability though. Ignorance has been fuelled by much of the press and the poor job our education system has done teaching real critical thinking (which I suppose is quite a dangerous thing).
 
I have to say Scotland, go for it. Save yourselves.

Save yourselves from an apparently perpetual reign of knuckle-dragging, proudly moronic, bigoted, short-sighted, imperialistic, lying, anti-intellectual, xenophobic cunts. Just a shame we can't do the same in London.

Unless... #londyref? :P
 
i'm english and for reasons of unity would rather scotland stay, but for their sake i hope they manage to get out. i wouldn't blame anyone for wanting to take whatever drastic measures possible to avoid potential decades of tory rule, and it's about the only conceivable way anyone could strike back against may at this point.

scotland deserves better than the toxic climate south of the border. it's a leap into the unknown, sure, but the UK isn't exactly the picture of stability the no campaign painted it as in 2014.
 
i'm english and for reasons of unity would rather scotland stay, but for their sake i hope they manage to get out. i wouldn't blame anyone for wanting to take whatever drastic measures possible to avoid potential decades of tory rule, and it's about the only conceivable way anyone could strike back against may at this point.

scotland deserves better than the toxic climate south of the border. it's a leap into the unknown, sure, but the UK isn't exactly the picture of stability the no campaign painted it as in 2014.

It may also free English progressives from having to side with the Tories on this issue...
 
everybody calling this "Scexit" just stop please? lol brexit is bad enough. I prefer "Scoot". Scotland Oot! Also scoot definition:

go or leave somewhere quickly. "they scooted off on their bikes"

synonyms: dash, dart, run, sprint, race, rush, hurry, hasten, hare, hurtle, bolt, shoot, charge, career, speed, fly, whizz, zoom
 
My dream world where we get Northern Ireland, Scotland, and all the big cities that votes to remain together and stay in as one country and let the rest go be a backwards ass hellhole looks so nice :(
 
everybody calling this "Scexit" just stop please? lol brexit is bad enough. I prefer "Scoot". Scotland Oot! Also scoot definition:

go or leave somewhere quickly. "they scooted off on their bikes"

synonyms: dash, dart, run, sprint, race, rush, hurry, hasten, hare, hurtle, bolt, shoot, charge, career, speed, fly, whizz, zoom

I like this!
It's good that we've got the right priorities when it comes to these critical issues.
 
It's certainly a brave move. If it's another "no" then she's gone.

Also, given what happened with what a mess the EU Referendum ended up being, I can't believe anybody in Scotland truly thinks this is a good idea.

If the choice is tie yourself to a rock and go for a swim or be lashed to the good ship England as it's captain is heading full speed into an iceberg then you may as well go on your own terms.
 
If the choice is tie yourself to a rock and go for a swim or be lashed to the good ship England as it's captain is heading full speed into an iceberg then you may as well go on your own terms.
Godspeed.
 
Fully in support. To be honest we should have been given a do-over the second the original context of the first Indy Ref changed. We wanted stayed due to the status as EU members and that went to shit.

I'll be voting Yes.
 
That's really sad.

I'm really surprised at the amount of people saying she should be killed.

Seems like a certain segment of the population sees Jo Cox's murder as legitimate political participation.

Dude of course they do, another leftist traitor dead in the ground where they belong. People actually think like this thanks to years of indoctrination
 
That's really sad.

I'm really surprised at the amount of people saying she should be killed.

Seems like a certain segment of the population sees Jo Cox's murder as legitimate political participation.

Most are probably getting overly emotional and spouting shite (bantz bro), as per a lot of tweets getting deleted once they go viral.

The rest, probably sheer hatred. I don't think anyone will actually want to hurt her, at least I hope, but political death threats get taken seriously so some of those accounts can probably expect investigation.

As always, people lose their minds on social media. Anger, passion and some general mockery can be fine, threats of violence, not so much. Especially aimed at someone who may be divisive, but she's not a terrible person on the humane front.
 
The EU have waded in unsurprisingly.

Genuinely interested to see what happens in this vein. How does Nicola spin it?

1. We accept we wont be automatically in EU but we'll buy into the Single Market?

2. We think the EU are wrong and we can because (legal reasons blah)?

3. Don't worry, we'll get in eventually and then it will be alright?

etc, etc.

If hard Brexit is the reason that Nicola is all for pulling the plug (as per her speach) how does she avoid hard Scexit/Scoot?

I liked Scoot better than Scexit - credit to the poster above
 
Yes, but some things will be bigger hits than others. What is more damaging for an independent Scotland economically? Joining the EU and foregoing a bilateral trade deal with rUK? Or staying outside of the EU and forming a bilateral trade deal with the rUK?

I just want a former/latter response. You're not a politician, you don't have to give me the Tony Blair non-answers about hope/confidence/unicorns full of self-esteem.

What guarantees that Scotland can actually get a good bilateral trade deal with rUK? Is it actually in the interest of rUK for such a deal to exists? Because if so, I don't see any negative side of this. Have the same trade status and taking back control. The dream of Brexit becoming true up north.
 
It's funny* reading all the leave voters doubling down in their comments online with comments to the effect of "fine just let them go if they love the EU so much". They STILL believe we're all sailing through the clouds on a golden boat to brexit Wonderland.

*depressing af
 
The EU have waded in unsurprisingly.

Genuinely interested to see what happens in this vein. How does Nicola spin it?

1. We accept we wont be automatically in EU but we'll buy into the Single Market?

2. We think the EU are wrong and we can because (legal reasons blah)?

3. Don't worry, we'll get in eventually and then it will be alright?

etc, etc.

If hard Brexit is the reason that Nicola is all for pulling the plug (as per her speach) how does she avoid hard Scexit/Scoot?

I liked Scoot better than Scexit - credit to the poster above
Her rationale is to get it over with before the deal is over. That way, Scotland would stay part of the EU.
 
If she loses this, she would be politically dead. Let's hope Scotland votes out.
I dont think she wants to be running a post Brexit Scotland without independence and I can't blame her. The Tories are going to gut the country and no amount of Devolution will prevent that.
 
Her rationale is to get it over with before the deal is over. That way, Scotland would stay part of the EU.

But that's not how the EU think it works. The Barroso Doctrine states that if one part of a member state leaves (votes for independence) then it needs to apply the same as any outside applicant.

I would love to hear her talk more about this as I can't see it happening. Catalonia is only part of the background to the Doctrine but it's an interesting problem she has.
 
What guarantees that Scotland can actually get a good bilateral trade deal with rUK? Is it actually in the interest of rUK for such a deal to exists? Because if so, I don't see any negative side of this. Have the same trade status and taking back control. The dream of Brexit becoming true up north.

The fact that Britain left the EU is now trying to be truly global with free trade for all? :D
 
The EU have waded in unsurprisingly.

Genuinely interested to see what happens in this vein. How does Nicola spin it?

1. We accept we wont be automatically in EU but we'll buy into the Single Market?

2. We think the EU are wrong and we can because (legal reasons blah)?

3. Don't worry, we'll get in eventually and then it will be alright?

etc, etc.

If hard Brexit is the reason that Nicola is all for pulling the plug (as per her speach) how does she avoid hard Scexit/Scoot?

I liked Scoot better than Scexit - credit to the poster above

From the article:

At a briefing in Brussels, Margaritis Schinas said: "The Barroso doctrine, would that apply? Yes that would apply, obviously."

He was referencing ​former commission president Jose Manuel Barroso, who set out the legal view that if one part of an EU country became an independent state it would have to apply for EU membership.

Could it be argued that this isn't really the case though?

Edit: I mean this is Scotland seeking independence from a country because of that country leaving the EU.
 
But that's not how the EU think it works. The Barroso Doctrine states that if one part of a member state leaves (votes for independence) then it needs to apply the same as any outside applicant.

I would love to hear her talk more about this as I can't see it happening. Catalonia is only part of the background to the Doctrine but it's an interesting problem she has.

These are uncharted waters. UK will no longer be a full member of EU at that point, but rather a member engaged in the article 50 process. In the end, EU can decide that part of the process is to keep Scotland in, as long as there is will for this at the EU level. Which is not clear. Could be also a strong bargaining chip for EU.
 
Could it be argued that this isn't really the case though?

That's what I'm waiting to hear. As a lawyer (thankfully not a constitutional one!) I just haven't heard anything from the EU that shows sympathy towards Scotland's position.

There are so many EU members that harbor fears of losing their own outlying regions that makes any change to the Doctrine difficult.
 
The whole thing is a nonsense. If Scotland votes out to become part of the EU in the wake of a hard brexit then it will lose free trade and freedom of movement with the UK, a situation that would be disastrous for the Scots, given that England takes 63% of their exports.

If there is no hard brexit, then the impetuous for the vote is gone.

I sympathise with the Scots but it is hard to see how voting for independence now is anything other than making a bad situation even worse. If anything the case is much weaker than it was previously. The prospect of a hard border between England and Scotland being something that is good for Scotland is ridiculous.
 
The whole thing is a nonsense. If Scotland votes out to become part of the EU in the wake of a hard brexit then it will lose free trade and freedom of movement with the UK, a situation that would be disastrous for the Scots, given that England takes 63% of their exports.

If there is no hard brexit, then the impetuous for the vote is gone.

I sympathise with the Scots but it is hard to see how voting for independence now is anything other than making a bad situation even worse. If anything the case is much weaker than it was previously. The prospect of a hard border between England and Scotland being something that is good for Scotland is ridiculous.

The vote is not now, but in 2018-2019. At that point the fate of Brexit will be known.
 
Scotland already knew was gonna be a EU referendum last time they voted, they voted stay as UK knowing UK could leave EU. I see no reason for a second vote, if EU was the priority they should have voted leave then. Trying have their cake and eat it too.
 
Not necessarily true, she's already had to clarify that as the BBC have already started with their "sources tell us x..."

https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/841301283730554885

One good thing about social media being as popular as it is now, MPs can almost instantly crush made up or exaggerated stories.

And "Sky Sources" are going to try and top BBC

Sky Sources: First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was pushed into seeking a second Scottish independence referendum by Alex Salmond and others

https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/841310577897164801

Because of course, she's a woman and that pesky Alex Salmond clearly bullies her? It's not that she is pro-independence, and a strong and well respected woman in her own party? It's not that she the day of Brexit went and discussed with the EU, and the attempted to with May, every opportunity to stay in the single market and avoid a hard Brexit, BEFORE going to independence? Nah. It's that Salmond bullying poor Nicola.

Here we go again guys, get used to BBC/Sky "sources" giving everyone the hot takes. The Daily Mail will probably do the "Most dangerous woman in Britain 2.0".
 
Re: EU and negotiations.

I'm dead sure that the EU won't touch Scotland with a laser pointer during negotiations with the UK unless to say that there's nothing to say until the UK leaves the EU.
 
The whole thing is a nonsense. If Scotland votes out to become part of the EU in the wake of a hard brexit then it will lose free trade and freedom of movement with the UK, a situation that would be disastrous for the Scots, given that England takes 63% of their exports.

If there is no hard brexit, then the impetuous for the vote is gone.

I sympathise with the Scots but it is hard to see how voting for independence now is anything other than making a bad situation even worse. If anything the case is much weaker than it was previously. The prospect of a hard border between England and Scotland being something that is good for Scotland is ridiculous.

Voting for independence is just us 'taking back control', you'd think the English would be sympathetic to that argument since in relation to the EU it causes you to lose all sense. It's our turn now, hold ma drink.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom