Robert at Zeboyd Games
Banned
An iPhone has a 256GB sku and is smaller and thinner than this device.
Yeah, if you're willing to pay $850 or more. I have a slight hunch that Nintendo wants to keep the Switch a little more accessible than that.
An iPhone has a 256GB sku and is smaller and thinner than this device.
Nintendo supports SD cards in Wii, Wii-U and their handhelds why wouldn't they support it in Switch? They aren't Sony.
I can't imagine the tablet having that much internal space i could see the shell that you place it in having a 500GB drive but if it's like wii-u where you can add additional space i am fine with having lower space because SD cards and external drives are dirt cheap.
32gb is good. I never use more than 10gb on any of my devices. I dont want to pay extra for memory ill never use
If there is indeed storage in the dock that would be great. Especially if there is a streamlined way to move your games from dock to tablet and back again. Just load the tablet up with whatever games you want to play on the go and sync with the dock when you return.
32gb is good. I never use more than 10gb on any of my devices. I dont want to pay extra for memory ill never use
32gb is good. I never use more than 10gb on any of my devices. I dont want to pay extra for memory ill never use
I know it'll have expandable storage, but it's a dedicated gaming device in 2017. It should come with more than 32GB.Keep price of entry down, allow expansion with SD cards for those that want it. Also hopefully external USB HDD support on the dock
They showed what looked like NBA 2K17 and that is definitely a 50+GB install
Well it has USB 3.0, so I see no reason why it wouldn't support external HDDs and a way to move game data to and fro the portable unit
Also one of the older leaks from Nate were of Pascal. So that's another wrench unless this is a very old Dev kit.
guys maxwell means no HDR
32GB is horrible
What is going on here?
Is it possible that the next gen iPad will blow this out of water?
Also one of the older leaks from Nate were of Pascal. So that's another wrench unless this is a very old Dev kit.
Now that I'm actually looking this up, the leaked specs are a carbon copy of the Jetson TX1 development board that was rumored to be in early NX dev kits. Basically a Tegra X1 on an embedded motherboard.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/jetson-tx1-module.html
32gb is good. I never use more than 10gb on any of my devices. I dont want to pay extra for memory ill never use
At least you want to believe
Yeah, to me this reads like the Jetson TX1 dev board.
I only believe Emily leaks. I don't think 32gb will be a flavor the Switch will come with.
64 will be base and 128 will be premium.
Edit : unless there is a micro SD card slot. I don't think this has been confirmed or not yet. If there is, 32GB is very possible.
LOL at people complaining about 32 GB when the thing uses cartridges and SD cards. Come on.
People are going to have so much fun keeping track of cartridges and SD cards and three different parts for a controller.LOL at people complaining about 32 GB when the thing uses cartridges and SD cards. Come on.
I have like 4 vc games, captain toad, hyrule warriors and pikmin 3 on my wiiu.How do you do that? I already use 20 GB on my 3DS and I don't have that many digital games.
32gb is good. I never use more than 10gb on any of my devices. I dont want to pay extra for memory ill never use
An iPhone has a 256GB sku and is smaller and thinner than this device.
Have you been gaming on PC or current generation consoles? Most of the big games are ranging in the 30-60 GB lately... If Switch is to get those multiplatform games, you will have to get extra memory.
People are going to have so much fun keeping track of cartridges and SD cards and three different parts for a controller.
LOL at people complaining about 32 GB when the thing uses cartridges and SD cards. Come on.
Not necessarily. It could be this kind of PR: "based on GeForce graphics cards' architecture and GeForce graphics cards are the world's top performing." Also, Wii U used 40 nm when 28 nm was an option. IIRC this 16 nm chip will have been out only slightly longer this time - though it was delayed for software so not necessarily even planned as such - but I can see Nintendo going 28 nm regardless to save money.
I do game on PC but unlike the switch i cant insert a cartridge in my PC and play doom right away. Was talking about non pc devices like my phone, game consoles, handhelds.Have you been gaming on PC or current generation consoles? Most of the big games are ranging in the 30-60 GB lately... If Switch is to get those multiplatform games, you will have to get extra memory.
This specs are the same as that of Tegra X1 which is 512 GFLOPs single precision and 1024 GFLOPs half precision.
It's a bit below 50% of xb1 on paper but obviously would be much better than that in real world perf.
At least you want to believe
32gb is good. I never use more than 10gb on any of my devices. I dont want to pay extra for memory ill never use
Not necessarily. It could be this kind of PR: "based on GeForce graphics cards' architecture and GeForce graphics cards are the world's top performing." Also, Wii U used 40 nm when 28 nm was an option. IIRC this 16 nm chip will have been out only slightly longer this time - though it was delayed for software so not necessarily even planned as such - but I can see Nintendo going 28 nm regardless to save money.
Yeh. Pretty much go physical. I have a few digital games here n there but my point is that forcing the extra cost on consumers is silly when u can very easily buy ur own sd card.You must never get digital only games, correct?