Dice
Pokémon Parentage Conspiracy Theorist
go get educated about how important freedoms are in a market kthxbyeYes lopsided in favour of the video maker, so you think they should balance it by taking more money then?
go get educated about how important freedoms are in a market kthxbyeYes lopsided in favour of the video maker, so you think they should balance it by taking more money then?
i don't think Nintendo is that stupid. if they ever messed with the GDQs, the bad press they would get would be pretty big. it would be they basically blocking charity and that's a big no-no. GDQs will proceed the same as usual.
not to mention everything in the GDQs is done on real hardware. emulators are never used there (except for official ones like Virtual console) and rom hacks are never there at all.
I think you might be right.i don't think Nintendo is that stupid. if they ever messed with the GDQs, the bad press they would get would be pretty big. it would be they basically blocking charity and that's a big no-no. GDQs will proceed the same as usual.
not to mention everything in the GDQs is done on real hardware. emulators are never used there (except for official ones like Virtual console) and rom hacks are never there at all.
i still want to see Nintendo shoot themselves in the foot just to see the shitstorm.
AGDC 2015 was on real games, wouldn't be the least bit affected.
Nintendo said:How Does Nintendo Feel About the Emergence of Video Game Emulators?
The introduction of emulators created to play illegally copied Nintendo software represents the greatest threat to date to the intellectual property rights of video game developers. As is the case with any business or industry, when its products become available for free, the revenue stream supporting that industry is threatened. Such emulators have the potential to significantly damage a worldwide entertainment software industry which generates over $15 billion annually, and tens of thousands of jobs.
What Does Nintendo Think of the Argument that Emulators are Actually Good for Nintendo Because it Promotes the Nintendo Brand to PC Users and Leads to More Sales?
Distribution of an emulator developed to play illegally copied Nintendo software hurts Nintendo's goodwill, the millions of dollars invested in research & development and marketing by Nintendo and its licensees. Substantial damages are caused to Nintendo and its licensees. It is irrelevant whether or not someone profits from the distribution of an emulator. The emulator promotes the play of illegal ROMs , NOT authentic games. Thus, not only does it not lead to more sales, it has the opposite effect and purpose.
How Come Nintendo Does Not Take Steps Towards Legitimizing Nintendo Emulators?
Emulators developed to play illegally copied Nintendo software promote piracy. That's like asking why doesn't Nintendo legitimize piracy. It doesn't make any business sense. It's that simple and not open to debate.
People Making Nintendo Emulators and Nintendo ROMs are Helping Publishers by Making Old Games Available that are No Longer Being Sold by the Copyright Owner. This Does Not Hurt Anyone and Allows Gamers to Play Old Favorites. What's the Problem?
The problem is that it's illegal. Copyrights and trademarks of games are corporate assets. If these vintage titles are available far and wide, it undermines the value of this intellectual property and adversely affects the right owner. In addition, the assumption that the games involved are vintage or nostalgia games is incorrect. Nintendo is famous for bringing back to life its popular characters for its newer systems, for example, Mario and Donkey Kong have enjoyed their adventures on all Nintendo platforms, going from coin-op machines to our latest hardware platforms. As a copyright owner, and creator of such famous characters, only Nintendo has the right to benefit from such valuable assets.
Isn't it Okay to Download Nintendo ROMs for Games that are No Longer Distributed in the Stores or Commercially Exploited? Aren't They Considered "Public Domain"?
No, the current availability of a game in stores is irrelevant as to its copyright status. Copyrights do not enter the public domain just because they are no longer commercially exploited or widely available. Therefore, the copyrights of games are valid even if the games are not found on store shelves, and using, copying and/or distributing those games is a copyright infringement.
Haven't the Copyrights for Old Games Expired?
U.S. copyright laws state that copyrights owned by corporations are valid for 75 years from the date of first publication. Because video games have been around for less than three decades, the copyrights of all video games will not expire for many decades to come.
Are Game Copying Devices Illegal?
Yes. Game copiers enable users to illegally copy video game software onto floppy disks, writeable compact disks or the hard drive of a personal computer. They enable the user to make, play and distribute illegal copies of video game software which violates Nintendo's copyrights and trademarks. These devices also allow for the uploading and downloading of ROMs to and from the Internet. Based upon the functions of these devices, they are illegal.
They're probably not done totally legally most of the time, but it's perfectly possible.Romhacks and TAS videos are done on not legal copies of games.
I'm always surprised when people are surprised that Nintendo does this. I mean, they have two pages existing on IP policy and one in particular that specifically talks about how the are against things such as emulation. Now, whether you actually agree with this or not, it's still there for everyone to see so it's not like its hidden information
http://www.nintendo.com/corp/ippolicy.jsp
http://www.nintendo.com/corp/legal.jsp
I mean, agree or disagree, they are pretty clear on this matter.
Err, TAS videos aren't inherently on non "real games".
There are TAS demonstrations there, so it'd be affected all the same.
I'm always surprised when people are surprised that Nintendo does this. I mean, they have two pages existing on IP policy and one in particular that specifically talks about how the are against things such as emulation. Now, whether you actually agree with this or not, it's still there for everyone to see so it's not like its hidden information
http://www.nintendo.com/corp/ippolicy.jsp
http://www.nintendo.com/corp/legal.jsp
I mean, agree or disagree, they are pretty clear on this matter.
Old men running the world. A new age!
Are you trying to say that they have no right to protect their IP and copyright?It doesn't really matter if they've explained themselves. It's still embarrassing and makes them look like a dinosaur - especially because no one else does nonsense like this.
i still want to see Nintendo shoot themselves in the foot just to see the shitstorm.
Are you trying to say that they have no right to protect their IP and copyright?
Are you trying to say that they have no right to protect their IP and copyright?
Doesn't mean they have to follow what other companies are doing.Very strange.
Other companies with meaningful IPs, like Disney, have no problems when people copy their old movies and publish them somewhere on the internet. Or...?
That's not my call to make as it's not that my IP is being manipulated, but I can definitely see how they are against it. They have explicitly said that no one is to emulate their games whatsoever, no matter what the reason. It's written on their site in black and white.You say that as though hacks or tool-assisted runs damage their brands.
Is there any more information on this than a Japanese blog post?
People are surprised because Nintendo's never taken legal action against emulator makers, even commercial ones. They go after ROM hosts/uploaders, and joint action against companies who make/sell game copiers, but that's pretty much it before.I'm always surprised when people are surprised that Nintendo does this. I mean, they have two pages existing on IP policy and one in particular that specifically talks about how the are against things such as emulation. Now, whether you actually agree with this or not, it's still there for everyone to see so it's not like its hidden information
http://www.nintendo.com/corp/ippolicy.jsp
http://www.nintendo.com/corp/legal.jsp
I mean, agree or disagree, they are pretty clear on this matter.
Is there any more information on this than a Japanese blog post?
It seems at least the GBA Mario Kart video was uploaded by user cstrakm, who still has a few videos up and those remaining videos have ads enabled. So it seems actually the ads were the problem, not the TAS videos themselves.
You do know that making backups is perfectly legal, right? And that it's entirely possible to make rom hacks and TASes of said legal backups?
They have explicitly said that no one is to emulate their games whatsoever, no matter what the reason.
if in the united states, making backups is illegal *IF* you have to circumvent ANY form of copy protection (which could be interpreted to include having to use a custom interface to acccess the chip).
It's Nintendo, whatever they do will be correct according to him.Uh, why?
it may be perfectly legal in other countries, such as japan, but here in the states if you have to bypass any form of protection at all, its a dmca violation to make a copy.
People are speedrunning Mario Kart with rom hacks? Wtf.
I mean, agree or disagree, they are pretty clear on this matter.
Old men are the future!
Great post, and you took the words right out of my mouth. They fail to mention that having rom backups of your own games is perfectly legal, and so emulators are not ilegal whatsoever. Nintendo being Nintendo.Nintendo's responses as to why they don't support emulators (as posted earlier) are more or less irrelevant as far as TASes and other videos go.
What their responses fail to take into account (conveniently, for them) is that emulators and personal backups aren't illegal at all. They instead speak around the issue and only talk about the fact that emulators can be used to play games which have been distributed illegally (which is a fair point on their end) and frame it as though emulators can only be used to play said illegal copies.
The problem with that is that unless Nintendo can prove that the roms being used are illegal, there's nothing they can do about people posting videos of them.
I think that's why they're removing them for monetary reasons. They know that there's no way they can realistically prove that the roms being used aren't legal so instead they're opting to just pull videos with any roms down since they can't control them.
Only problem is, this also hurts people who are playing (and making videos) completely legally, which in no way helps Nintendo at all. This whole thing comes off like Nintendo throwing a tantrum about the fact that they can't control the ecosystem.
Honestly, if it's just videos of speed-run cheating, is it really that big of a deal, or is this in fear of cause-effect (removing videos of emulation and such)?
Please explain how this TAS can be described as "speed-run cheating"?Honestly, if it's just videos of speed-run cheating, is it really that big of a deal, or is this in fear of cause-effect (removing videos of emulation and such)?
if in the united states, making backups is illegal *IF* you have to circumvent ANY form of copy protection (which could be interpreted to include having to use a custom interface to acccess the chip).
it may be perfectly legal in other countries, such as japan, but here in the states if you have to bypass any form of protection at all, its a dmca violation to make a copy.
i don't think Nintendo is that stupid. if they ever messed with the GDQs, the bad press they would get would be pretty big. it would be they basically blocking charity and that's a big no-no. GDQs will proceed the same as usual.
not to mention everything in the GDQs is done on real hardware. emulators are never used there (except for official ones like Virtual console) and rom hacks are never there at all.
i still want to see Nintendo shoot themselves in the foot just to see the shitstorm.
This isn't "just speed-run cheating". TAS and rom-hacks are big projects which can require months of work and are made by very dedicated and talented people. Nintendo has no reason to intervene here in any way. (Unless it's really just about monetization)
Romhacks and TAS videos are done on not legal copies of games.