jetsetmario said:
Don't you know GAF's motto?
"Upgrade or Die"
I have the same problem when people talk about backwards compatibility as an unimportant feature. Like four or five PS1 games got played on my PS2 this summer alone. **** neophilia.
Mejilan said:
I'd love an HDTV but I can't justify the cost, particularly since the industry itself can't seem to quite decide on a solid and final HDTV standard.
This is one of the reasons the TV market is going to eat itself. The long-term-view smart plan would've been to optimize 1080p technology and launch
that last year at a huge premium as the one true HD format, ensure that every HD set can actually display it, and let it slowly seep into the mainstream. The piecemeal, everything's-incompatible approach is a pain in the ass.
On top of that, I don't actually WATCH television, so I'd only use it as a monitor for video gaming and the occasional DVD-watching.
Same here. We have two TVs right now, the repoed one and the old RF-driven one, and the main distinction is that one has a PS2 hooked up and the other a GameCube. We basically never watch broadcast TV and don't have cable.
MoxManiac said:
I think your proirities are wrong, that's all. It should go:
1) games
2) equipment to play said games on
then
3) food, rent and essentials
Haha.
What's funny is that the reason I have the TVs I do is because I put games so high on my priority list. When it comes time to spend pure entertainment disposable income, video games are main thing my wife and I are interested in spending it on, short of spur-of-the-moment dinners out or special events. I could absolutely afford to buy a new TV, but that'd come at the expense of saying no to the next-gen systems for probably several years, or skipping like ten good new games I'd otherwise want to play. What good does
that do me?