• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

No major third party support in the Wii horizon, why?

TheRipDizz said:
Not third party wise. Not even anywhere near close to being actually.
That's because Wii third party support wasn't anywhere near close first year 360 third party support either.
 
speculawyer said:
It is a stupid question. There is a ton of 3rd party Wii support.

The latest Medal of Honor is supposed to be a good FPS.

ATVI has Guitar Hero 3. You just know Rock Band is coming.
Pretty much all the main sports are there: Madden, NBA Live, MLB 2K8, (maybe NBA 2K8?) . . . maybe hockey next season too.

Don King Prizefighter even snubbed the PS3 but will be on the Wii.


So what do you want?

GTA IV? . . . it is probably too big/difficult to get it running on the Wii.
CoD 4 . . . again . . . too big/difficult to get running on the Wii.
Orange Box? . . . they couldn't even get it run well on the PS3!


Ok, I agree that in terms of bread and butter support Wii is improving. Lots of sports games coming (finally!). But what about original, high budget Wii games? Red Steel 2?
 
JJConrad said:
The biggest problem is that GAF has crap tastes and lables any PS3/360 title as "major" support. Case in point:Previous releases of these series weren't most unnoticed. None of these games would have been considered major titles on the Wii, and I'd bet people would just be complaining that it wasn't getting some other series instead. (Mafia 2 was first announced in August, and when did Tomb Raider get unbanned?)

There is still a lot of talk about games that were announced years ago. When people talk about major support they still think of MGS4, FFXIII, GTA4 and RE5 first. We're still waiting, with no firm release dates for any. Barring being cancelled and sent over, these games just won't be released on the Wii. Other games in the series will, but they proabably "won't count" when they do.

How many people believe that Capcom has been supporting the 360 and PS3 well? How many people realize that Capcom has yet to release a PS3 game to retail and hasn't released a 360 game like that since Lost Planet? Everything has been small download games. DMC4 will be their first Ps3 game and their first 360 game in a year. That is not good support.

Konami, Square-Enix, Take-Two are all stringing people along in similar manner.

very significant points in this post and GAF should read them again.
 
TheRipDizz said:
Not third party wise. Not even anywhere near close to being actually.

Does that even matter? It just shows that third parties have not made the right decisions on the Wii. But they didn't have the time to forsee all this ofcourse. I think that big Wii games are just recently getting out of preproduction.
 
Tristam said:
I thought you avoided 3D platformers. :-P

Yep, but Galaxy transcends that. Asked my wife to get it for me for my birthday a few days ago because I didn't want to feel directly responsible for burning myself on yet another 3d platformer whose camera made me sick or whose gameplay put me to sleep. Now I'm about 55 stars in and it's certainly among my Top 3 GOTY and probably my favorite 3d platformer ever. Hell, I couldn't even get into Mario 64 but Galaxy is just wow. Really made me want more good Wii games, though obviously Galaxy is a once-or-twice-a-gen kind of thing.
 
Exceptions =/ Rule
Also, it looks like jrpgs are not selling no matter what system they are released for nowadays. Go figure.
:lol Can we keep this arguments in the MPD/Media Creat threads. It's so obvious who reads those and who doesn't.
 
Jokeropia said:
Wii's software sales are NOT subpar. In fact, they're actually greater than 360 software sales in it's first year.


As expected counting Wii sports and Wii play, now lets focus on 3rd parties which is what were supposed to be talking about. Subpar is a fitting word for the topic at hand. Here comes the defense force...
 
I think it's mostly because the bigger third party games like Mass Effect and Assassin's Creed will sell really well on 360. They're traditional, easier for developers to make, tried-and-true formulas, they already invested in the resources for these kinds of games, and they're making a lot of money. But with Wii's growing userbase and newer examples from Nintendo on how to make Wii software (like Galaxy), we'll probably start seeing more new things on Wii.

I'm starting to wonder if it'll be like NES, where it starts out mostly supported by Nintendo, but ends up getting very innovative games from third parties. At least, I hope for my Wii's sake that that happens.
 
unomas said:
As expected counting Wii sports and Wii play, now lets focus on 3rd parties which is what were supposed to be talking about. Subpar is a fitting word for the topic at hand. Here comes the defense force...

And that is the blame of the third parties, not because 7 million Americans decided they hated third parties.
 
unomas said:
As expected counting Wii sports and Wii play, now lets focus on 3rd parties which is what were supposed to be talking about. Subpar is a fitting word for the topic at hand. Here comes the defense force...

*facepalms*
 
unomas said:
As expected counting Wii sports and Wii play, now lets focus on 3rd parties which is what were supposed to be talking about. Subpar is a fitting word for the topic at hand. Here comes the defense force...
Actually it's true even if you remove both Wii Sports and Play. That most of the sales have gone to first party games is a result of subpar third party support out of the gates compared to 360/PS3. (Even so, Wii third party sales > PS3 third party sales.)
 
jman2050 said:
*facepalms*

I've gotten laughed out of these threads before by team Ninty for saying long ago 3rd parties wouldn't flock to Wii because of the install base. That software sales and the combined PS3/360 userbase would overcome it. I'll be back in 6 months when you guys are still asking why the big 3rd party games aren't coming to Wii.

1) Many 3rd party devs don't like Ninty or the direction they want to take gaming

2) Downporting from 360/PS3 probably isn't high on the priority list

3) 360 software sales are amazing
 
Jokeropia said:
Uh, the DS has become the #1 platform for almost every Japanese developer, and while the Western support has been weaker in comparison there's still a pretty large example in EA who even explicitly announced the shift in their financial reports.

You mean #1 as in earns them loads of cash? Well, if you take a look at the third party games on the DS, you'll soon realize that the games are profitable because they were dirt cheap to make. No resources needed to be shifted to make them.
 
ksamedi said:
What about it? The Wii version is crap and is best played on next gen consoles.


The easiest excuse for a 3rd party game not selling on Wii is that it's crap. Well Mario and Sonic seems to be doing just fine...
 
Anyway... how about rounding up the notable 3rd party series that have seen core sequels migrate to Wii over PCS360? I'll go first with some JP stuff!

Capcom
-Monster Hunter
-Devil Kings

SEGA
-Super Monkey Ball
-Puyo Puyo
-NiGHTS

Chunsoft
-Fushigi no Dungeon

MMV/Natsume
-Harvest Moon
-River King

Tecmo
-Fatal Frame

...what else?
 
schuelma said:
Ok, I agree that in terms of bread and butter support Wii is improving. Lots of sports games coming (finally!). But what about original, high budget Wii games? Red Steel 2?
To be fair: High budget games on 360 often have success. It's not like third parties really need to release this kind of games on Wii, at least at the moment. The Wii's strength now are low to mid budget games, with a few exceptions (Monster Hunter 3?) and Nintendo's own big guns.
Then again, the situation won't stay this way. The userbase is growing hugely, the third parties can't ignore this fact. I expect some big titles coming in the third year of the Wii, maybe there are already some in the second half this year.
 
Another thing to keep in mind, is that most devs/publishers just didn't expected the success of the Wii, so they put a lot of money and teams working on the other 2 consoles...

You can't expect them to just waste those millions and restart from scratch in a year. Most studios/devs/publishers started taking the Wii "seriously" by Spring-Summer 2007...6 months is not enough time to make a good Wii game (or any game for that matter, a port usually can be done in 1-3 months depending on the quality though), and that's just the port of the engine, so what they have been releasing right now is mostly just the shovelware and ports they already had in the pipeline, while they make the "good games"... (hopefully :p )
 
jarrod said:
Anyway... how about rounding up the notable 3rd party series that have seen core sequels migrate to Wii over PCS360? I'll go first with some JP stuff!

Capcom
-Monster Hunter
-Devil Kings

SEGA
-Super Monkey Ball
-Puyo Puyo
-NiGHTS

Chunsoft
-Fushigi no Dungeon

MMV/Natsume
-Harvest Moon
-River King

Tecmo
-Fatal Frame

...what else?

King Story, Final Fantasy CC, and uhhh...

:(
 
ksamedi said:
What about it? The Wii version is crap and is best played on next gen consoles.

Some people swear by the Wii version of Madden due to the motion controls. However, don't expect it to look like the HD versions of Madden.


Perhaps this thread should be called "Why can't developers make games on an SDTV machine with a processor a little better than last gen look just as good as HDTV machines with multi-core processors?"
 
There is lot's third party support for the Wii, it's just that it's not aimed at the hardcore. I would say that there are two reasons for this:

First, Nintendo is ignoring the hardcore, the Ninthings can say what they want, but when half of the big N's E3 conference consisted of youtube movies that might be a hint. Oh sure, there are the usual games and SSBB will be huge, but Nintendo isn't spotlighting these games. Third parties see this behaviour and follow in their footsteps. Wii won't see a significant increase in hardcore (abbreviated hc from now on) games until Nintendo takes the first steps.

The second is that it seems many 3rd parties don't know how to create a hc game for the Wii. They don't know where to start and how to impress gamers. Graphics? Impossible. Clever online implementation? Impossible.
And face it, the wiimote just isn't ideal for many genres and for some it's downright impossible (like fighters). On the other hand, it's ideal for minigames.

Add the simplicity of ps2 ports and a userbase which consists of Nintendo fans who buy primarly Nintendo games and Soccer Moms who want to play with their kids, it seems little no surprise that 3rd parties will go down the path of least resistance and quick money.

That being said, I think the situation will improve, but it's gonna take a long time.
 
unomas said:
I've gotten laughed out of these threads before by team Ninty for saying long ago 3rd parties wouldn't flock to Wii because of the install base. That software sales and the combined PS3/360 userbase would overcome it. I'll be back in 6 months when you guys are still asking why the big 3rd party games aren't coming to Wii.

1) Many 3rd party devs don't like Ninty or the direction they want to take gaming

2) Downporting from 360/PS3 probably isn't high on the priority list

3) 360 software sales are amazing

7ycgi1u.jpg
 
unomas said:
1) Many 3rd party devs don't like Ninty or the direction they want to take gaming
They they are screwed
unomas said:
2) Downporting from 360/PS3 probably isn't high on the priority list
Then don't. Wii owners don't want splinter cell. They want good original games

unomas said:
3) 360 software sales are amazing
For some genres. For others they are terrible.
 
TheRipDizz said:
Exceptions =/ Rule
Also, it looks like jrpgs are not selling no matter what system they are released for nowadays. Go figure.

I was under the impression that they were doing fine on the DS. We've had a pair of fair disappointments on the 360 (Blue Dragon, and I don't expect too much out of Lost Odyssey for NA/EU, although it's realistic style may appeal more to 360 users), with 1 release for PS3 (can't remember the title) and Wii (Opoona in Japan) each also.

And remember that although many "core" gamers love the 360, there are still those that don't care for it at all.

That being said, I may eventually pick up an arcade when it hits $150, since i have no use for the differences between the arcade and premium. :)

Sadly though, at this point, the only "hope" for a solid FPS (story, single player, same console multiplayer, online multiplayer) on Wii is Red Steel 2. And we know Ubisoft's track record. >.<
 
unomas said:
The easiest excuse for a 3rd party game not selling on Wii is that it's crap. Well Mario and Sonic seems to be doing just fine...

Maybe because people like it? Its basically Wiisports 2. The point is that some games have a better chance of selling on the Wii than others. Almost all multiplatform Wii games sell like crap because they are made for other platforms first and ported later on with replacements of buttons with motion. Many Wii owners probably also have a PS2 or a 360 so most of the time people have other choices for there multiplatform games. Most of the time those choices are the better ones as well. Like the Need for Speed games for example. A Wii game should be exlusive or the better/equal version of a multiplatform release to sell well. Look at Resident evil Wii edition or Guitar Hero 3.
 
JJConrad said:
The biggest problem is that GAF has crap tastes and lables any PS3/360 title as "major" support. Case in point:Previous releases of these series weren't most unnoticed. None of these games would have been considered major titles on the Wii, and I'd bet people would just be complaining that it wasn't getting some other series instead. (Mafia 2 was first announced in August, and when did Tomb Raider get unbanned?)

There is still a lot of talk about games that were announced years ago. When people talk about major support they still think of MGS4, FFXIII, GTA4 and RE5 first. We're still waiting, with no firm release dates for any. Barring being cancelled and sent over, these games just won't be released on the Wii. Other games in the series will, but they proabably "won't count" when they do.

How many people believe that Capcom has been supporting the 360 and PS3 well? How many people realize that Capcom has yet to release a PS3 game to retail and hasn't released a 360 game like that since Lost Planet? Everything has been small download games. DMC4 will be their first Ps3 game and their first 360 game in a year. That is not good support.

Konami, Square-Enix, Take-Two are all stringing people along in similar manner.

Funny thing is that most gaffers will read that and totally ignore it.

In my opinion most companies put their eggs in the PS360 basket and didnt count on Wii. Anyone that know how bussines are run knows that you just dont press a button that says "lets make wii games" and after that you have plenty of games. It takes time for many reasons.

Eventually at this rate, Wii will be considered the number 1 console for hardcore gamers, and companies will love making games for them since there are cheaper to make. By then 360 and ps3 will be at PSP position, at best

Anyone find it funny that the Wii's best games barely use waggle?

thats not true, the thing is that sucky games overuse it just for the novelty.

The good games have a balanced use of waggle. Thats how it is supposed to be
 
Zerodoppler said:
You mean #1 as in earns them loads of cash?
#1 as in it gets the most (even big franchise) support.
Zerodoppler said:
Well, if you take a look at the third party games on the DS, you'll soon realize that the games are profitable because they were dirt cheap to make.
And you know, because they sell like gangbusters.
Zerodoppler said:
No resources needed to be shifted to make them.
Whether or not it was necessary, PSP resources was shifted into DS resources.
speculawyer said:
Some people swear by the Wii version of Madden due to the motion controls
Primarily the 07 version, though. By most accounts 08 was a step down.
Xapati said:
First, Nintendo is ignoring the hardcore, the Ninthings can say what they want
*rolleyes*
 
Starchasing said:
Eventually at this rate, Wii will be considered the number 1 console for hardcore gamers, and companies will love making games for them since there are cheaper to make. By then 360 and ps3 will be at PSP position, at best

PS3 would be lucky to be in PSP's position.
 
Eteric Rice said:
King Story, Final Fantasy CC, and uhhh...

:(
No, I meant core series sequels... not spinoffs (FFCC) or new games (King Story). Actually, Wii's getting quite a few interesting original efforts from JP 3rd parties (Zack & Wiki, Fragile, Oboro Muramasa Youtouden, Elebits, Dewey, etc).
 
speculawyer said:
It is a stupid question. There is a ton of 3rd party Wii support.

The latest Medal of Honor is supposed to be a good FPS.

ATVI has Guitar Hero 3. You just know Rock Band is coming.
Pretty much all the main sports are there: Madden, NBA Live, MLB 2K8, (maybe NBA 2K8?) . . . maybe hockey next season too.

Don King Prizefighter even snubbed the PS3 but will be on the Wii.
That's a ton to you?
 
AstroLad said:
Yep, but Galaxy transcends that. Asked my wife to get it for me for my birthday a few days ago because I didn't want to feel directly responsible for burning myself on yet another 3d platformer whose camera made me sick or whose gameplay put me to sleep. Now I'm about 55 stars in and it's certainly among my Top 3 GOTY and probably my favorite 3d platformer ever. Hell, I couldn't even get into Mario 64 but Galaxy is just wow. Really made me want more good Wii games, though obviously Galaxy is a once-or-twice-a-gen kind of thing.

Yep, unfortunately. Maybe next gen!
 
avatar299 said:
Then don't. Wii owners don't want splinter cell. They want good original games
Like M&L, which is tearing up the charts. Or mono, DLC-less GH3, although that one is tearing up the charts even moreso on the PS2 and 360.

For some genres. For others they are terrible.
Name them.
 
Tristam said:
Yep, unfortunately. Maybe next gen!

Well, I was definitely going to get Smash Bros. anyway, but now I'm actually quite looking forward to it. Such is the halo effect of Galaxy.
 
Starchasing said:
Eventually at this rate, Wii will be considered the number 1 console for hardcore gamers, and companies will love making games for them since there are cheaper to make. By then 360 and ps3 will be at PSP position, at best

At what rate? :lol

The hardcore market will only become more solidified in the PS3/360 stratum as time goes on.
 
jman2050 said:
PS3 would be lucky to be in PSP's position.

my guess is

360 will sell a little above XBOX and PS3 will get gamecubed, and 360 will be its PS2.

Wii will end being what it is supposed to be , an everyman console.... not counting graphics whores of course

The hardcore market will only become more solidified in the PS3/360 stratum as time goes on

The graohic whore market will only become more solidified in the PS3/360 stratum as time goes on. And they both will reach the saturation point sooner
 
Starchasing said:
Funny thing is that most gaffers will read that and totally ignore it.
Or we'll read it and think back to all the threads where games like Dewy, Nights, and Z&W were considered major 3rd party support. Nfans are easily just as guilty of listwar idiocy.

Eventually at this rate, Wii will be considered the number 1 console for hardcore gamers, and companies will love making games for them since there are cheaper to make. By then 360 and ps3 will be at PSP position, at best
For the 360 to be at PSP position software would actually have to start selling negative numbers.
 
No6 said:
Like M&L, which is tearing up the charts. Or mono, DLC-less GH3, although that one is tearing up the charts even moreso on the PS2 and 360.


Name them.

I was under the impression that GH3 for Wii in North America was nearing the 360's frontsided numbers?
 
speculawyer said:
Some people swear by the Wii version of Madden due to the motion controls. However, don't expect it to look like the HD versions of Madden.


Perhaps this thread should be called "Why can't developers make games on an SDTV machine with a processor a little better than last gen look just as good as HDTV machines with multi-core processors?"
Madden 07 was great. 08... not so much.
 
Tristam said:
Yep, unfortunately. Maybe next gen!
I dunno, EAD was pretty good at pumping out the hits way back... just replace arcade racers with non-games and their Wii lineup looks just like N64. :lol


Confidence Man said:
At what rate? :lol

The hardcore market will only become more solidified in the PS3/360 stratum as time goes on.
What about the hardcore who like JP stuff? Handheld ghetto?
 
avatar299 said:
Platformers, J-rpgs,puzzle games, party/casual games aside from the guitar segment of that market
Well, we know about the jrpg problem, but I'm at a loss as to which platformers, puzzle games, and party games failed.
 
vanguardian1 said:
I was under the impression that GH3 for Wii in North America was nearing the 360's frontsided numbers?
You are correct, although the Wii version shortages in December may reverse that trend (and Rockband may counteract that reversal, we'll know in a week or so).
 
No6 said:
Well, we know about the jrpg problem, but I'm at a loss as to which platformers, puzzle games, and party games failed.
It's sort of like asking which major Wii FPS, racing sims, sandbox actioners and WRPGs failed. :lol


In the puzzle column though, Lumines Live has been a pretty huge success. Actually it's basically the only successful Lumines release after the PSP original.
 
No6 said:
Or we'll read it and think back to all the threads where games like Dewy, Nights, and Z&W were considered major 3rd party support. Nfans are easily just as guilty of listwar idiocy.
So you will read it and the point will go right over your head.

No6 said:
Well, we know about the jrpg problem, but I'm at a loss as to which platformers, puzzle games, and party games failed.
Better yet, tell me which of those games were successful. Kameo got mixed reviews and relatively low sale, puzzle and niche games are almost non-existent on the 360 and Scene it...well I'm sure in your world Scene It will be better received than wiisports.
 
Top Bottom