legacyzero
Banned
Of course I don't mind, glad you like them.
Cool! What do you think?-
Also, I plan on whipping up some avatars, so will probably doing something like that if you're open to it.
Good stuff.
Of course I don't mind, glad you like them.
I am somehow convinced this game will be a massive disappointment (I think procedural generation that generates *interesting* stuff repeatedly is very hard to get, and most planets will look same-y and boring) of Molyneux standards.
Nevertheless, I kind of want to play it at release Stupid hype.
Does anyone know if there are any major expected differences between PC/consoles? Is it console dev first, PC second?
I am tempted to get it on PC because, hell, it's a space sim. But at the same time being so targeted towards consoles might mean the controls will be very optimized for pads.
so from the people who already is playing, are they reporting thsi game is good? whats the consensus?
Love the GAF Gold one.
Cool! What do you think?-
Also, I plan on whipping up some avatars, so will probably doing something like that if you're open to it.
Good stuff.
That's how I spent my time in that game.Yeah over in the Starbound thread some folks aren't even interested in the Main quest, and just want to explore different planets
It's nice, I didn't actually notice it the first time I looked at the image, so it's subtle enough to not get in the way. Maybe it slightly interferes with the rest of the color combinations, but otherwise it would not have the GAF association. I'm thinking maybe I should do a one color version, might be a useful alternative?
EDIT:
Also, regarding the avatars, sure, send me a PM if you need the vector image or anything else.
Should be ok. Just having transparency with it is great.
Sure thing, it's good either way.
Here's a couple more variations, nothing better to do tonight.
Any news about the PC version yet?
Sure thing, it's good either way.
Here's a couple more variations, nothing better to do tonight.
Little to non. Not even recommended specs. Maybe that's why they delayed it a few days, perhaps?
Little to non. Not even recommended specs. Maybe that's why they delayed it a few days, perhaps?
Well that doesn't fill me with confidence.Little to non. Not even recommended specs. Maybe that's why they delayed it a few days, perhaps?
YO, if someone doesn't mind adding the last one to my avatar, it would be greatly appreciated.
Amazing!
Sure thing, it's good either way.
Here's a couple more variations, nothing better to do tonight.
I thought they released the requirements?
Did you mean like alongside your avatar logo, or just a resized version of the emblem? Either way, here are some variations: http://imgur.com/a/eUEpq
Thanks!
On topic, man, I hope the game performs well on an AMD rig, my R9 380X and FX-8350 should be enough, but I just feel there'll be some weird hitching, sound stutter or something with the luck I'm having. Not a shot at the devs, just my rig.
Shweeeet!Standard:
Engage!
I'm getting it tattooed on my forehead.Nobody minds if i use one of these for an Avatar, do they. ?
Meh I doubt it. But now all I see is the potential for people to go "lol denial,spore 2.0 etc etc"Mods on the No Man's Sky reddit just posted this :
We have collected some evidence that the leaked copy may be a stolen demo or non-final developer copy.
YO THE TWIST it's LOST season 2 all over again
Mods on No Man's Sky reddit just posted this :
We have collected some evidence that the leaked copy may be a stolen demo or non-final developer copy.
YO THE TWIST it's LOST season 2 all over again
Mods on the No Man's Sky reddit just posted this :
We have collected some evidence that the leaked copy may be a stolen demo or non-final developer copy.
YO THE TWIST it's LOST season 2 all over again
"Not sean's game!"
While possibly true, the evidence presented by the mods is pretty desperate. Chances are...the game has some bad bugs (crashes) that must be sorted and that the game may not actually be that great.Mods on No Man's Sky reddit just posted this :
We have collected some evidence that the leaked copy may be a stolen demo or non-final developer copy.
YO THE TWIST it's LOST season 2 all over again
If it was a preview or demo copy why would they use a retail box to store it.
For Example:
That wasn't S2, it was S3.
Didn't the leaker buy his copy from someone who had played it briefly?Can be a fake retail box. It wasn't even wrapped up in plastic. And the inner booklet was the same than the one in UC4 boxes (with the old date). Just need a PS4 game box, the UC4 inner booklet of NMS, a good printer to print the cover of NMS, and done.
If it was a preview or demo copy why would they use a retail box to store it.
For Example:
I really doubt it.Mods on the No Man's Sky reddit just posted this :
We have collected some evidence that the leaked copy may be a stolen demo or non-final developer copy.
YO THE TWIST it's LOST season 2 all over again
Mods on the No Man's Sky reddit just posted this :
We have collected some evidence that the leaked copy may be a stolen demo or non-final developer copy.
YO THE TWIST it's LOST season 2 all over again
Ahah yes ! I forgot it was in the S3 and not in the S2 tho', my bad"Not sean's game!"
Man, this thread just got crazy, lol.
Maybe he procedurally generated the game.
Didn't the leaker buy his copy from someone who had played it briefly?
Mods on the No Man's Sky reddit just posted this :
We have collected some evidence that the leaked copy may be a stolen demo or non-final developer copy.
YO THE TWIST it's LOST season 2 all over again
So
the game turned out terrible?