I wasnt aware of this until mkenyon (credit to Crisium) brought it up in this thread here.
GTX 780Ti
Lead over 290X = +9.7% (Nov 7, 2013)
Lead now = +4.2%
Lead over 290X decreased over 50%.
GTX 780
Lead over 290X = -7% (Oct 23, 2013)
Lead now = -16.3%
290X lead increased over 100%.
GTX 760
Lead over 270X = +12% (Oct 7, 2013
Lead now = +4.6%
Lead over 270X decreased over 60%.
So you can see across the board - big Kepler, performance Kepler and mainstream Kepler all have seen their performance age not too well. Really hoping this is an isolated case and does not repeat with Maxwell. You can also read the comparison by Crisium.
GTX 780Ti
Lead over 290X = +9.7% (Nov 7, 2013)
Lead now = +4.2%
Lead over 290X decreased over 50%.
GTX 780
Lead over 290X = -7% (Oct 23, 2013)
Lead now = -16.3%
290X lead increased over 100%.
GTX 760
Lead over 270X = +12% (Oct 7, 2013
Lead now = +4.6%
Lead over 270X decreased over 60%.
So you can see across the board - big Kepler, performance Kepler and mainstream Kepler all have seen their performance age not too well. Really hoping this is an isolated case and does not repeat with Maxwell. You can also read the comparison by Crisium.
Who keeps their cards over a year anyway, right? RIGHT!!!1