-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[NX Gamer] Assassin's Creed: Valhalla - The Complete Technical Analysis - All Consoles
- Thread starter GribbleGrunger
- Start date
Handy Fake
Member
Cliff notes?
skneogaf
Member
Devil may cry is better as the 3 options that are usable the xbox series x was a little bit better.
Neither hit a good enough 120fps so anyone who thinks ps5 won on that game is being silly.
The 2 consoles are the closest I can remember to rival consoles have ever been I think.
N1tr0sOx1d3
Given another chance
Great analysis. A lot of time must have gone in to this to compare 7 different consoles.
Insane Metal
Member
59,8 fps on XSX and 59.9 on PS5. 52FPS minimum on XSX, 57 on PS5 I think? Don't remember. Resolution is the same as are all assets.
BlueXImpulse
Banned
PS5 was better in some areas, higher resolution shadow maps, bloom was consistently better on PS5 too.
They are close enough though. Third party seems like a wash this generation.
They are close enough though. Third party seems like a wash this generation.
geordiemp
Member
I think
NXGamer
tried to include too many consoles here, tongue twisted between ps4 / ps5 and xb1x and series X.
God all of us would get tongue twisted talking about so many consoles.
I hope he just does ps5 and XSX in future so its easier to follow,a nd do a little side note for Series S at the end maybe.
NXGamer
tried to include too many consoles here, tongue twisted between ps4 / ps5 and xb1x and series X.God all of us would get tongue twisted talking about so many consoles.
I hope he just does ps5 and XSX in future so its easier to follow,a nd do a little side note for Series S at the end maybe.
Last edited:
N1tr0sOx1d3
Given another chance
I was hoping screen tearing would be a thing of the past.
IQ has never been so important.
People can’t be expected to put up with this when they spend so much on new consoles/ 4K TVs with VRR....etc.
IQ has never been so important.
People can’t be expected to put up with this when they spend so much on new consoles/ 4K TVs with VRR....etc.
N1tr0sOx1d3
Given another chance
I agree. MS don’t help with their absurd naming conventions.I think
God all of us would get tongue twisted talking about so mnay consoles.
I hope he just does ps5 and XSX in future so its easier to follow,a nd do a little side note for Series S at the end maybe.
Neko Mimi Mode
Member
Can't watch right now, but how did Series S fair against One X?
assurdum
Banned
The only reason because ps5 win everytime it's because the narrative around the series X been always oriented to "set the world to the fire" in performance, so even when it's not in a clear advantage, ps5 is still in a better position. Whatever multiplat will land on ps5 will be always a victory except if games will start to show dramatic difference (but I doubt it honestly). MS should just blame themselves, because overpromise rarely gives comeback for the companies
Last edited:
INC
Member
dead monkey uk
Member
Was just about to post the same. The XSX and PS5 are quite similar in general except for the tearing on XSX.
Going to be interesting to see how the XSS effects this gen. Early results are not looking encouraging.
Last edited:
GribbleGrunger
Dreams in Digital
If someone else does it, I'll stick it in the OP. I'm not particularly interested in stuff like this but I know other GAFF members are.
Aceofspades
Banned
skneogaf
Member
Do you consider fps average of 0.01 is better?
I'm just going off what digital foundry shown us.
The non 1080p@120fps mode they imply that the series x was a little bit better.
If xbox fixes the screen tearing on its games I can't imagine many players being able to tell if only playing the one version.
Knitted Knight
Banned
Last edited:
alabtrosMyster
Banned
I still find it embarrassing when trying to say something about the og xbox vs the xbox one then the one s/x vs the series S/X... only the 360 doesn't get in the mix, but the problems started when they named the 360, marketing did not know where to go after this.
Imagine the kids that will be disappointed because their parents will not have time to figure out all this and they will buy another ones s/x instead of one of the new toys.
Agnostic2020
Member
Xsx drops to 50
Ps5 drops to 57
Loads more screen tearing on xsx
Some effects like bloom and skin texture are higher on ps5
Xsx drops more often to 1440p vs ps5 1640p but ps5 also does drop to 1440p in some instances
inflation
Member
Why does Ubi target X1X such high resolution? Dipping into 15 FPS is not pleasant for anyone. Just use the same settings as Pro.
N1tr0sOx1d3
Given another chance
I couldn’t agree more. Amazon posted a 2000% increase in Xbox One X sales on preorder day for XBSX.
Theres going to be a lot of disappointment this Xmas.
Last edited:
geordiemp
Member
Time to see how the worlds most powerful console is doing, at the same time lets see what xbox is doing too
You getting worse every day young fishy
Last edited:
sircaw
Banned
You getting worse every day young fishy
DID I SAY SOMETHING INCORRECT< WELL DID I< DAMMIT
And that's one awesome emote!
waquzy
Member
No
geordiemp
Member
DID I SAY SOMETHING INCORRECT< WELL DID I< DAMMIT
And that's one awesome emote!
VFXVeteran
Banned
We need a PC comparison to all of these XSX/PS5.
Last edited:
Vognerful
Member
I
I have no fucking idea what you are talking about because I can't see shit.And yes again, PS5 has the sharper overall image, slightly though:
Open both on separate pages, zoom as much, or download both and investigate. This could be a result of a more lossy compression on XSX via BCPack vs Oodle Kraken.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Want some help? I'll do zooms for you if you want. I'm viewing it on a 55" 4K tv, so it can be unfair to you but zooms make things easier.
skneogaf
Member
Issa wrap.
How does this fix the ps5 being worse in 3 of the 4 modes available? Surely this fix just just allows us to select 60fps.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Oh no I can zoom myself, I don't see any difference. If I have to zoom 5000 times to see the difference then clearly xbox won (less resources to get same result)
Nah, I didn't zoom and can see it on its native form. It should be much easier via direct feed from both consoles though as youtube compression makes it harder.
If you can't see it, don't worry, it's your natural limitation.
Last edited:
This is the result of the image compression and/or a minim angle change.And yes again, PS5 has the sharper overall image, slightly though:
Open both on separate pages, zoom as much, or download both and investigate. This could be a result of a more lossy compression on XSX via BCPack vs Oodle Kraken.
But I really don't see that much differences.
Last edited:
Riky
$MSFT
If you've got VRR then screen tearing is a thing of the past.
Insane Metal
Member
Listen fucking carefully here, if XSX was using V-Sync, the performance would be even worse, and the delta will be larger in favor of PS5: (timestamped)
Overall delta even with Xbox consoles having no V-Sync support and enjoying a festival of tearing:
Just wait for the T O O L S to mature. It'll be 90FPS with VSync on XSX. And no tearing at all.
Last edited:
ChuckeRearmed
Member
So is Ubisoft the king of no-optimizations?
It seems like the first big patch for AC, will make these comparisons completely obsolete.
It seems like the first big patch for AC, will make these comparisons completely obsolete.
Last edited:
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Both are from the very same source, PNG lossless files to keep it as it is without further quality loss like in JPG. Anyway, it would be much better if we compare direct feed screenshots from both systems.
Last edited:
Insane Metal
Member
That to me looks like better Anysotropic FIltering on PS5, same case as WDL.And yes again, PS5 has the sharper overall image, slightly though:
Open both on separate pages, zoom as much, or download both and investigate. This could be a result of a more lossy compression on XSX via BCPack vs Oodle Kraken.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Last edited:
Epic Sax CEO
Banned
And yes again, PS5 has the sharper overall image, slightly though:
Open both on separate pages, zoom as much, or download both and investigate. This could be a result of a more lossy compression on XSX via BCPack vs Oodle Kraken.
For me it looks more like a problem in the video capture or encoding, at least this is the impression I get seeing these images. There's something wrong with the output on the SeX. Everyone is talking now about how the PS5 deliver less bandwidth from it's HDMI, but what about how it's using that bandwidth compared with the SeX? I feel that the SeX is delivering subpar video output.
This is what I'm more interested in.