cheststrongwell
my cake, fuck off
Looks awful. This will be a disaster if it gets funded.
Will the VArse be compatible with the Xbone?
I read that as VArse.
More competition is always good.
expected proper VR headset for gaming......... this is not that.
I read that as VArse.
Actually in essence this is not far away from what the Oculus Rift is: a smartphone screen displaying stereoscopic imagery
It's like saying: "Oh, it's the same as walking, except that you don't have any legs.."
I wouldn't mind proper competition, but let's face it, without tracking sensors, it is not VR, period. They shouldn't call it VR, or have the words "virtual reality" anywhere near this thing. It's more like a 3DTV taped to your face, not a VR headset.
It sounds like it would be terrible, but surprisingly it's not. I got to try out a similar contraption at Gamescom by a company called Dive VR or something, you slide a smartphone in their setup (looked very similar), load up the app and bam, the experience was not very far away from the Oculus Rift at all. (and I've tried the Rift)
I read that as VArse.
this kinda stuff can actually come very close to what the Rift does. And while the Rift does do a lot of custom stuff, it's not doing anything that is lightyears beyond traditional gyroscopes in smartphones, in fact I believe the hardware is derived from just about that.
You know, your "close to what the Rift does" is what made VR fail several times already..
..and not to mention weight...oh my god the thought of having my Galaxy Note 2 on my forehead........... Haha
Really?! We've had affordable VR headsets with 'retina' resolution displays and pretty solid gyroscopes and tracking several times before? Incl easy software support and drivers? Tell me more about this.
Yes. Smartphones these days. So heavy. Those iPhone 5's are like bricks of lead.
Of course the Oculus Rift is way more optimized but I am actually 100% convinced you wouldn't be talking like this if you had tried out the Dive VR or vrAse concept. After having tried it, it's easy to imagine a scenario where VR find its way to mainstream because of these kinds of smartphone-based setups.
Download any content which is “Side by Side” (SBS) ready to your smartphone and you are set. The Smartphone is a machine built for communications, so you can also stream the contents and games from various devices, such as the PC, MAC and TV.
pretty solid
I read that as VArse.
Add me to that list.ITT 129 people read the name as v-arse.
I read this as VR-arse.
And it looks like it too. More in common with a view master than with a proper VR system.
But hopefully this kinda stuff is the spur the Oculus team needs to turn VR into not just a headset, but a platform...
.I read that as VArse.
They've realized that VR was hot and figured out how they can jump on the bandwagon without any of the R&D that Oculus is putting in.
I welcome competition, but this isn't competition. This is a sideshow. If people see "VR" through one of these and the framerate/tracking/pixel refresh/etc aren't very good at all, and they think that it's indicative of where VR currently is, then it's a bad thing.
They're going to need to change that name QUICK.
God, i had to read it many times to finally get "ok, vArse", duh!I read that as VArse.
I don't get it.
Occulus Rifts's shortcomings are:
Now look at this thing:
- not enough resolution (needs at least 960x1080p per eye to be ok, better would be 1280x1440p, best would be 2048x2160)
- need a really powerful PC GPU to drive those resolutions
- slight input lag
- no full positional tracking (yet)
- Smartphone screen res << PC
- Smartphone GPU performance <<<< PC
- to get rid of GPU performance lack -> Smartphone gets streaming data from PC = giant input lag
- no tracking
VrAse is a terrible name even without misreading.No they don't need to. That is the name will get them attention.