buizel
Banned
Sorry its just the tone of the title/post kinda only works if it links to RONGOBONGO's sick thread
oh yeh, ive got an outlet for shitting on era, its called google chrome
Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Off-site Community Discussion (Reset, etc.) -- READ OP. Stay civil. Don't make it personal. Keep it in here.
- Status
Sorry its just the tone of the title/post kinda only works if it links to RONGOBONGO's sick thread
oh yeh, ive got an outlet for shitting on era, its called google chrome
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Yeah its not VIP treatment. The team will remove anyone's account if requested. You just have to directly contact one of the Mod Captains and make a formal request.
Last edited:
Stilton Disco
Member
Well that sucks, hopefully he makes a full recovery.
Fake
Member
I requested a permaban, nickname remove, avatar remove and all info like my email/twitter acc from my profile to be deleted.
As you can see, I get perma, but all my information including my old avatar and nick is still there.
funfact: Thats why one of the 'The Verge' jornalist had blocked me on twitter. I don't follow him, never retweet, never answer him or even click on 'like' button, but somehow he block me. I guess is because my twitter account is still attached on my deleted profile.
Last edited:
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
That's not how it should work. Do you know specifically which Mod you were in contact with?
Caffeine
Member
just ask jawmuncher on twitter to do it. jawmuncher is a nice mod.
Barnabot
Member
Dude, just try clicking in the Contact Us link
identify yourself as your Era username and email related to your account and ask them to delete your account and everything related to that account according to their Terms and Rules.
EDIT:
It's located in the lower part of the main page
Last edited:
TrainedRage
Banned
We get it you're a pussy. Some of us aren't.
You don't hug and shake the hand of the thief who tried to steal your property.
Honk Honk
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
TrainedRage
Banned
You think every kid that does 'something bad' is going to straight up stab or shoot someone when confronted? You live entirely too much online.
Its called fight or flight we know you use your little wings. Some people don't.
If some little shit took my stuff you better believe im not just gonna go, "oh no, oh well they may have a gun, I will just keep walking to whole foods."
Fake
Member
Already did that... Are you not listening?Dude, just try clicking in the Contact Us link
identify yourself as your Era username and email related to your account and ask them to delete your account and everything related to that account according to their Terms and Rules.
EDIT:
It's located in the lower part of the main page
Barnabot
Member
You didn't say that you previously tried doing that by clicking on Contact Us link before. That's how I got mine deleted and it should work the same way for you.
Fake
Member
Both 'contact us' and even shinobi/ZhugeEx twitter profile. Maybe they know I create a account here, but I make all those options.
How do you think my perma was accept?
I asked all in the same time I contact the staff.
Last edited:
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Whatever you say Rambo.
C
Contica
Unconfirmed Member
Yeah, I've had a knife waved in my face, so this is pretty shit advice.
No possession is worth risking your life.
Barnabot
Member
I never used the "permaban" word when I requested an account deletion there. That's why we may have got different mileage from the same subject.
Last edited:
Fake
Member
I using just for talk to you silly... I get a one week ban from pointing the serebii guy is a toxic member as well those who complain of him.
From that I request a permanent ban, formally requested without using any vulgar or agressive word. Was two contacts: One from remove all while ban and the second was asking why my info was not deleted was I requested.
My next move was contact shinobi and ZhugeEX via private mensage, explaining the resetera staffing are ignoring my request of complete account clear.
Of course, both ignored as well.
Thats bring to the point: Why Phantom Thief request was so quick? They even remove his nickname from the site. I sense somethink very similar with that 'resetera pedo' case. Staff was so fast for cleaning and name changing I almost don't even notice.
Last edited:
Barnabot
Member
What are you talking about? You can still see his username in his posts if they were quoted.
Alec Holowka (Night in the Woods, TowerFall) accused of sexual assault [Update: Alec Holowka has reportedly passed away] [See staff posts/threadmarks]
Just seeing this on the first page made me feels sick. People of Resetera have played their part in this tragedy. Whether the allegations were real or not, this mob culture has to stop. Anyone could be accused of wrongdoing and find their life destroyed, regardless of truth. That could easily be...
www.resetera.com
That loser will never be able to swept under the rug all the bullshit he said in that forum.
Last edited:
Fake
Member
The site can't remove his nickname from quote mind you (site limits), but I've talking about his account nickname on his profile. Just look from the original post.What are you talking about? You can still see his username in his posts if they were quoted.
Alec Holowka (Night in the Woods, TowerFall) accused of sexual assault [Update: Alec Holowka has reportedly passed away] [See staff posts/threadmarks]
Just seeing this on the first page made me feels sick. People of Resetera have played their part in this tragedy. Whether the allegations were real or not, this mob culture has to stop. Anyone could be accused of wrongdoing and find their life destroyed, regardless of truth. That could easily be...
That loser will never be able to swept under the rug all the bullshit he said in that forum.
edit:
The last picture.
vs
Bad audio in Game Mode (Samsung 4KTV)
Thats a problem I trying to solve for years. This is my TV: Samsung Ultra High Definition UN40JU6000G - https://www.samsung.com/br/support/model/UN40JU6000GXZD Problem: When I turn game mode on, the audio from the TV looks really crap. I tryed to solve in many ways, but my direct problem was...
www.resetera.com
Last edited:
Helios
Member
My childWhat are you talking about? You can still see his username in his posts if they were quoted.
Alec Holowka (Night in the Woods, TowerFall) accused of sexual assault [Update: Alec Holowka has reportedly passed away] [See staff posts/threadmarks]
Just seeing this on the first page made me feels sick. People of Resetera have played their part in this tragedy. Whether the allegations were real or not, this mob culture has to stop. Anyone could be accused of wrongdoing and find their life destroyed, regardless of truth. That could easily be...
That loser will never be able to swept under the rug all the bullshit he said in that forum.
I watched with pride as you grew into a weapon of righteousness.
But the truest victory, my son, is stirring the nest of the purple-headed.
I tell you this, for when my days have come to an end,
You shall be King.
Last edited:
Hecaton117
Member
Reading through the current Dragon's Crown thread that started up today and I came across this comment (and another on the previous page)
www.resetera.com
I've noticed this tendency in the last couple years to take words that have strong meaning behind them (Nazi, incel, misogyny, etc) and completely misuse them for innocuous things or things that the user simply dislikes that have nothing to do with the word itself.
How is it that one can reasonably argue that creating imagery that one could find sexually attractive or pleasing is an act of misogny? If I create an image of a man with the same intent am I committing misandry (even if arguing that it has "less effect")? Most works that have these sorts of elements mostly cater to one demographic because that's what the creators like and/or are trying to sell to. The argument doesn't hold water imo since if works that target heterosexual men are sexist and thus bad because they don't target anyone else then that means works that target other groups are also sexist for not targeting other groups as well.
That would mean that Dream Daddy for example is sexist because it wasn't created to cater to straight men or women.
Otome games are sexist and thus bad because they don't cater to straight or homosexual men and homosexual women.
Calling works that cater to a single group sexist and bad (but not applying the same logic to works that appeal to you) does nothing but further the pointless demonization of people who are doing nothing wrong other than existing and expressing their sexuality.
Straight people are always going to be the majority. Straight people, just like any other group of people, are going to express their sexuality whether personally or through creative works. That's just always going to be a thing. So this trend of people acting like someone creating works that appeal to them (that are straight men in this instance) is committing some mortal sin is completely pointless.
Also I noticed that in this thread people are claiming that they are merely criticizing Dragon's Crown, but I would suggest that there's a difference between criticizing something, in that it attempts to do something and could do better and arguing that something should just not exist or change to be fundamentally different from what the creator is attempting to accomplish.
If I said that I dislike the fact that Call of Duty is a first person shooter and instead should be a third person melee combat game, I don't think saying "I'm just critiquing this" is a reasonable response to someone telling me that I should play something else. In this case I am arguing against something that is a core part of the experience that the game and its creators are trying to provide. Another example would be saying that a comedy movie would be much more enjoyable if it was an action movie instead. At that point you're not really giving points for how the movie can improve on what it's trying to accomplish, but instead saying that it should just be something entirely different that suits your tastes.
At the end of this, I think it would be really cool if people could just stop hating other people for having an attraction and expressing that through creative works, and instead spend that energy creating whatever it is they personally want including things they think there aren't enough of but given what I've seen on the internet these past number of years I think that desire is a bit too optimistic.
Revisiting the controversy surrounding Dragon's Crown's art direction and character designs
Yeah there is clearly no balance here. To say otherwise is to be lying.
www.resetera.com
I've noticed this tendency in the last couple years to take words that have strong meaning behind them (Nazi, incel, misogyny, etc) and completely misuse them for innocuous things or things that the user simply dislikes that have nothing to do with the word itself.
How is it that one can reasonably argue that creating imagery that one could find sexually attractive or pleasing is an act of misogny? If I create an image of a man with the same intent am I committing misandry (even if arguing that it has "less effect")? Most works that have these sorts of elements mostly cater to one demographic because that's what the creators like and/or are trying to sell to. The argument doesn't hold water imo since if works that target heterosexual men are sexist and thus bad because they don't target anyone else then that means works that target other groups are also sexist for not targeting other groups as well.
That would mean that Dream Daddy for example is sexist because it wasn't created to cater to straight men or women.
Otome games are sexist and thus bad because they don't cater to straight or homosexual men and homosexual women.
Calling works that cater to a single group sexist and bad (but not applying the same logic to works that appeal to you) does nothing but further the pointless demonization of people who are doing nothing wrong other than existing and expressing their sexuality.
Straight people are always going to be the majority. Straight people, just like any other group of people, are going to express their sexuality whether personally or through creative works. That's just always going to be a thing. So this trend of people acting like someone creating works that appeal to them (that are straight men in this instance) is committing some mortal sin is completely pointless.
Also I noticed that in this thread people are claiming that they are merely criticizing Dragon's Crown, but I would suggest that there's a difference between criticizing something, in that it attempts to do something and could do better and arguing that something should just not exist or change to be fundamentally different from what the creator is attempting to accomplish.
If I said that I dislike the fact that Call of Duty is a first person shooter and instead should be a third person melee combat game, I don't think saying "I'm just critiquing this" is a reasonable response to someone telling me that I should play something else. In this case I am arguing against something that is a core part of the experience that the game and its creators are trying to provide. Another example would be saying that a comedy movie would be much more enjoyable if it was an action movie instead. At that point you're not really giving points for how the movie can improve on what it's trying to accomplish, but instead saying that it should just be something entirely different that suits your tastes.
At the end of this, I think it would be really cool if people could just stop hating other people for having an attraction and expressing that through creative works, and instead spend that energy creating whatever it is they personally want including things they think there aren't enough of but given what I've seen on the internet these past number of years I think that desire is a bit too optimistic.
nush
Member
Caffeine
Member
and the guy he was responding to got banned to for alt account they are so angry all the time they are infighting now.
#Phonepunk#
Banned
It is so weird to consider. A video game forum full of game journalists that also hates gamers and in many cases the games themselves
Last edited:
bucyou
Member
youre a pussy because you are an era CSR in here
nush
Member
They crave credibility, it might have been cool to be a games reviwer and writer in your late teens but when you grow up and have repsonibilities you basically become pussy kryptonite. There's fucking no (academic) talent Youtubers out there with more fame and money they have.
Ribi
Member
Adult Swim just posting straight up transphobia now [possibly misinterpreted, see additional comics in OP]
Some other comics by the artist:
www.resetera.com
Aw shit, here we go again
Fake
Member
Politics...
brap
Banned
>mad grossAdult Swim just posting straight up transphobia now [possibly misinterpreted, see additional comics in OP]
Some other comics by the artist:
Aw shit, here we go again
Stop speaking in ebonics, whitey. Also currently loling @ all the retards in the twitter feed (or whatever it's called) bitching about boomers.
BOOMER AND PROUD
FUCK RETARDERA
FUCK MILLENIALS
FUCK ZOOMERS
crybaby ass little bitches
Last edited:
ULTROS!
People seem to like me because I am polite and I am rarely late. I like to eat ice cream and I really enjoy a nice pair of slacks.
They should go into politics than video games, maybe their interest on video games has faded already and they're just trying to scavenge whatever interest is left by smearing politics in it.
#Phonepunk#
Banned
The boomer hate is really funny since everything they worship from Marvel and Star Wars to their own leisure filled pop consumerist lives was created by boomers
Last edited:
DragoonKain
Neighbours from Hell
Oh, we're in the Twilight Zone, alright.
Reading through the current Dragon's Crown thread that started up today and I came across this comment (and another on the previous page)
Revisiting the controversy surrounding Dragon's Crown's art direction and character designs
Yeah there is clearly no balance here. To say otherwise is to be lying.
I've noticed this tendency in the last couple years to take words that have strong meaning behind them (Nazi, incel, misogyny, etc) and completely misuse them for innocuous things or things that the user simply dislikes that have nothing to do with the word itself.
How is it that one can reasonably argue that creating imagery that one could find sexually attractive or pleasing is an act of misogny? If I create an image of a man with the same intent am I committing misandry (even if arguing that it has "less effect")? Most works that have these sorts of elements mostly cater to one demographic because that's what the creators like and/or are trying to sell to. The argument doesn't hold water imo since if works that target heterosexual men are sexist and thus bad because they don't target anyone else then that means works that target other groups are also sexist for not targeting other groups as well.
That would mean that Dream Daddy for example is sexist because it wasn't created to cater to straight men or women.
Otome games are sexist and thus bad because they don't cater to straight or homosexual men and homosexual women.
Calling works that cater to a single group sexist and bad (but not applying the same logic to works that appeal to you) does nothing but further the pointless demonization of people who are doing nothing wrong other than existing and expressing their sexuality.
Straight people are always going to be the majority. Straight people, just like any other group of people, are going to express their sexuality whether personally or through creative works. That's just always going to be a thing. So this trend of people acting like someone creating works that appeal to them (that are straight men in this instance) is committing some mortal sin is completely pointless.
Also I noticed that in this thread people are claiming that they are merely criticizing Dragon's Crown, but I would suggest that there's a difference between criticizing something, in that it attempts to do something and could do better and arguing that something should just not exist or change to be fundamentally different from what the creator is attempting to accomplish.
If I said that I dislike the fact that Call of Duty is a first person shooter and instead should be a third person melee combat game, I don't think saying "I'm just critiquing this" is a reasonable response to someone telling me that I should play something else. In this case I am arguing against something that is a core part of the experience that the game and its creators are trying to provide. Another example would be saying that a comedy movie would be much more enjoyable if it was an action movie instead. At that point you're not really giving points for how the movie can improve on what it's trying to accomplish, but instead saying that it should just be something entirely different that suits your tastes.
At the end of this, I think it would be really cool if people could just stop hating other people for having an attraction and expressing that through creative works, and instead spend that energy creating whatever it is they personally want including things they think there aren't enough of but given what I've seen on the internet these past number of years I think that desire is a bit too optimistic.
Labeling people nazis, transphobes, sexist, racists, etc is far more destructive than anything the people they label are doing. In terms of cultural and personal/emotional impact. No one was ever harmed from a character design in a video game or all the weird bullshit they bitch about in video games nowadays. But labeling people awful stuff that isn't true can cause real life major damage to both that person and in society. They don't understand, nor do they care. Because doing so gets them the attention and social media approval they crave, and damn anyone they hurt.
Xaero Gravity
NEXT LEVEL lame™
Pretty sure that's a parody account, but funny nonetheless.
SirKicksalot
Member
Segaman fighting shower beer fans in a thread brought to you by David Lynch:
www.resetera.com
what's up with food brands promoting a lot of *really* unhealthy habits lately?
So I'm watching football, and they have this Dr. Pepper Fansville commercial, and it has a bunch of people drinking 2 liter bottles of Dr pepper like they were 20 oz bottle. It made me think of a tweet from Oreos a little while back where they were encouraging people to dip their Oreo cookies...
www.resetera.com
nush
Member
People here need to learn to click through to the main twitter account.
nush
Member
Are we witnessing the final time he goes mental at people for disagreeing with him and getting a perma? I hope so.Segaman fighting shower beer fans in a thread brought to you by David Lynch:
what's up with food brands promoting a lot of *really* unhealthy habits lately?
So I'm watching football, and they have this Dr. Pepper Fansville commercial, and it has a bunch of people drinking 2 liter bottles of Dr pepper like they were 20 oz bottle. It made me think of a tweet from Oreos a little while back where they were encouraging people to dip their Oreo cookies...
He made it one month before showing his ass again
Krejlooc comes back from a ban and does the classic Era "oh so sorry, I'll do better forgive me" topic.I contributed to toxic webculture when I was younger
This has been on my mind since there was a topic a few weeks ago where a bunch of posters wondered why people never appologize for bad previous online behavior until it blows up in their face, and has made me want to take my own lumps. As I begin to reach into later adulthood, with fresher eyes...
1. It's been done many times before
2. It won't save you from your next ban
3. He's not a "used to be" asshole, but a "still is" asshole who's substituted all his personality for facts about Sega.
Last edited:
Reading through the current Dragon's Crown thread that started up today and I came across this comment (and another on the previous page)
Revisiting the controversy surrounding Dragon's Crown's art direction and character designs
Yeah there is clearly no balance here. To say otherwise is to be lying.
I've noticed this tendency in the last couple years to take words that have strong meaning behind them (Nazi, incel, misogyny, etc) and completely misuse them for innocuous things or things that the user simply dislikes that have nothing to do with the word itself.
How is it that one can reasonably argue that creating imagery that one could find sexually attractive or pleasing is an act of misogny? If I create an image of a man with the same intent am I committing misandry (even if arguing that it has "less effect")? Most works that have these sorts of elements mostly cater to one demographic because that's what the creators like and/or are trying to sell to. The argument doesn't hold water imo since if works that target heterosexual men are sexist and thus bad because they don't target anyone else then that means works that target other groups are also sexist for not targeting other groups as well.
That would mean that Dream Daddy for example is sexist because it wasn't created to cater to straight men or women.
Otome games are sexist and thus bad because they don't cater to straight or homosexual men and homosexual women.
Calling works that cater to a single group sexist and bad (but not applying the same logic to works that appeal to you) does nothing but further the pointless demonization of people who are doing nothing wrong other than existing and expressing their sexuality.
Straight people are always going to be the majority. Straight people, just like any other group of people, are going to express their sexuality whether personally or through creative works. That's just always going to be a thing. So this trend of people acting like someone creating works that appeal to them (that are straight men in this instance) is committing some mortal sin is completely pointless.
Also I noticed that in this thread people are claiming that they are merely criticizing Dragon's Crown, but I would suggest that there's a difference between criticizing something, in that it attempts to do something and could do better and arguing that something should just not exist or change to be fundamentally different from what the creator is attempting to accomplish.
If I said that I dislike the fact that Call of Duty is a first person shooter and instead should be a third person melee combat game, I don't think saying "I'm just critiquing this" is a reasonable response to someone telling me that I should play something else. In this case I am arguing against something that is a core part of the experience that the game and its creators are trying to provide. Another example would be saying that a comedy movie would be much more enjoyable if it was an action movie instead. At that point you're not really giving points for how the movie can improve on what it's trying to accomplish, but instead saying that it should just be something entirely different that suits your tastes.
At the end of this, I think it would be really cool if people could just stop hating other people for having an attraction and expressing that through creative works, and instead spend that energy creating whatever it is they personally want including things they think there aren't enough of but given what I've seen on the internet these past number of years I think that desire is a bit too optimistic.
I completely do not understand the panty wetting over something like this.
Surely you can just look at the art and say "nah, it's not for me"?
It's not like they have drawn something illegal here so I don't even get why there has to be ANY level of outrage?
They are just so convinced that the right thing for the videogame industry right now is to be constantly policed by these moral busybodies.
You look at the art and you say "that doesn't appeal to me" and then you vote with your wallet basically.
There doesn't have to be anything more than that.
It just seems like the height of entitlement to say "I don't like what you are doing with this game but I want to play the game so I am going to moan and complain until the game changes into something I feel comfortable playing".
Can't they just play something else?
S
slugbahr
Unconfirmed Member
No. No they cannot.
In all of human history to date, there are only 11 books, 4 video games, 7 movies, 16 musical recordings, 2 TV shows and 3 sporting activities to choose from.
That's not a lot of choice or variety. Not for them, at least. Perhaps for you.
But then, you are just a piece of trash, racist homophobic, misogynist Nazi for not having any empathy for their lack of alternatives.
nush
Member
The outrage bans were for the most part contained in rees Off Topic section. But they have burned through most of the normies that posted there. Since the E3 Pokemon topic they have realized that there is far more fresh blood and better ban hunting on the gaming side so they have migrated there to get the dopamine hit of getting someone banned for wrongthink.
GHG
Member
It feels like it's getting harder to discuss thing calmly in the gaming community
It really is. This week has proven this point once again, sadly.
www.resetera.com
Banned for speaking the truth.
#Phonepunk#
Banned
Is it stupid if your reasons to get by in life is pretty much only entertainment?
Like the TV Show that you liked, upcoming games, season of your favorite sport and etc.. I'm not talking about empathy in general, I still cares about news, injustice and peoples but for self serving reason I feel those above is pretty much the only reason I working and looking forward. Its...
www.resetera.com
Should I be surprised that a board full of people who see no value in life beyond consuming fantasy entertainment is also full of self styled “rational atheists” lol but that kind of oblivious hypocrisy is par for the course
Birth of a writer! When you find no joy in life and have to express that. Wonder if there is a connection between people whose jobs are just posting their own thoughts all day long and people who don’t feel life has anything to value? Maybe get a job helping other people? Writer is like the most self centered job you can have.
Board is full of self loathing narcissist consumerists no wonder the concept of God offends them.
Last edited:
Rien
Jelly Belly
Is it wrong to think and expect that the Alt Right will co-opt the Joker film?
No, but be aware of potential issue gives you time to figure out ways to prevent it happening like here, this is a movie that has the serious potential of being co-opted, this is our chance to show them that we won't let our fiction be taken over by them. We may not be able to fully able stop...
www.resetera.com
You cant make this shit up.
Bitmap Frogs
Mr. Community
It feels like it's getting harder to discuss thing calmly in the gaming community
It really is. This week has proven this point once again, sadly.
Banned for speaking the truth.
Thread shut down.
Thabass
Member
Imagine breaking up with your girlfriend over when Fall starts. Incredible.
It feels like it's getting harder to discuss thing calmly in the gaming community
It really is. This week has proven this point once again, sadly.
Banned for speaking the truth.
Kind of poetic really. They did the exact thing that person said they do. Irony is delicious.
Last edited:
GHG
Member
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll