GoncaloCCastro
Member
Moeeed said:the video is up on japanese store..wooooooooooot
edit 638mb I am 63% done![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thanks for the heads up. Can't wait to see it in HD
Moeeed said:the video is up on japanese store..wooooooooooot
edit 638mb I am 63% done![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Gearharaden said:I pulled the trigger with joy. Ha, Joy, The Boss, MGS humor.
The exact same video is available for download here: http://www.gamersyde.com/leech_4141_en.htmlGearharaden said:Ah caca, you mean on the PSN store? Crap. I gots no PS3 son!
Get one.Gearharaden said:Ah caca, you mean on the PSN store? Crap. I gots no PS3 son!
CSSer said:
BlackGoku03 said:Get one.
![]()
Ey, come on. This kind of inventory is way to old fashion and it add nothing to the gameplay. Limiting the weapons would make an huge impact on the stealth part of the game and would also make sense, now that you are able to pic up the enemies wapons (jesus christ finally you can....). Also this thing with the barrel was just stupid. I mean, I just couldn't help to laugh out when I saw it in the gameplay-trailer.Gearharaden said:Shut up. Shut the **** up. Don't even encourage this sort of thought. ****ing Halo ruined action games by limiting the amount of carried weapons to a realistic amount. If I wanted realism in an action game, I'd go join the army. Carrying 500 weapons is fine.![]()
TheExorzist said:Ey, come on. This kind of inventory is way to old fashion and it add nothing to the gameplay. Limiting the weapons would make an huge impact on the stealth part of the game and would also make sense, now that you are able to pic up the enemies wapons (jesus christ finally you can....). Also this thing with the barrel was just stupid. I mean, I just couldn't help to laugh out when I saw it in the gameplay-trailer.
TheExorzist said:Ey, come on. This kind of inventory is way to old fashion and it add nothing to the gameplay.
TheExorzist said:Also this thing with the barrel was just stupid. I mean, I just couldn't help to laugh out when I saw it in the gameplay-trailer.
It adds nothing to the gameplay? Being able to freely use whatever weapon you choose adds nothing to the gameplay?
Naked Snake said:Is blimblim's MP4 video encoded from the above wmv version? I would rather download the original than a re-encode (the file size is also larger), it should have less artifacts, right?
You bought an iPhone instead of a PS3?Gearharaden said:If I had any money, I'd have one right now. Too bad the iPhone raped my wallet.
Wait a minute. If the limitation of wapons is an unfair shortcut than what the hell is "carrying 1000 weapons with you"? It's kind of a legal cheat. Also, this is not Halo (though I can't understand your critisism here...). You can kill nearly everyone in the game with just one shot. So where is the problem? I mean, in MGS it would be the easiest thing to limit the weapons since nearly all of them lost their sense with the integration of the tranquilizer gun. In MGS2 and 3 the whole bunch of machine guns didn't really had a sense, since you just got spotted when you used them. And so it will be in MGS4. So I don't really see you point. You can play through the whole ****ing game only with the tranquilizer gun. So who would care if the weapons would be limited to a certain degree? Most of them are useless anyway.Gearharaden said:No, man. Just, no. I don't understand why people enjoy that kind of shit. In a game where I shoot things, I wanna shoot with as many weapons as I can, and I want to keep those weapons with me all the time, very simple. Shooting = Guns = Needs lots of guns. Halo started the stupid fad of regenerating health and gimped artillery, and I hate it. It's not a real challenge, it's simulated difficulty, just like having enemies that take luck to beat rather than skill (AHERMNINJAGAIDENAHERM), it's not actually difficult, it's just an unfair shortcut.
Geezer said:You bought an iPhone instead of a PS3?
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol:lol:lol
There should be an 'O' and another 'L' too but the forum messes up the formatting of the smilies.
Wait a minute. If the limitation of wapons is an unfair shortcut than what the hell is "carrying 1000 weapons with you"? It's kind of a legal cheat. Also, this is not Halo (though I can't understand your critisism here...). You can kill nearly everyone in the game with just one shot. So where is the problem? I mean, in MGS it would be the easiest thing to limit the weapons since nearly all of them lost their sense with the integration of the tranquilizer gun. In MGS2 and 3 the whole bunch of machine guns didn't really had a sense, since you just got spotted when you used them. And so it will be in MGS4. So I don't really see you point. You can play through the whole ****ing game only with the tranquilizer gun. So who would care if the weapons would be limited to a certain degree? Most of them are useless anyway.
No, the L is just fine.Geezer said:You bought an iPhone instead of a PS3?
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol:lol:lol
There should be an 'O' and another 'L' too but the forum messes up the formatting of the smilies.
BlackGoku03 said:I'd rather have a choice between a large library of weapons than a choice between two. That's aggravating. That would almost ruin the game for me.
No, the L is just fine.
Now, Gearharaden, all you have to do is take the iPhone back and return it. Then go get a PS3 and Motorstorm or Resistance. Simple fix.![]()
Gearharaden said:There's no way I'm taking the iPhone back. It's a great phone. I can wait until the PS3 is 100 dollars thx :lol
Raist said:No, you can't wait forever![]()
superbank said:If I ever play MGS4 I'm going to set it to the hardest difficulty level. If a solider sees me laying on the floor 2 feet away from him I want him to kick the shit out of me for being so stupid.
Since when was "shooting enemies which constantly spawn" fun? Come on, the goal of MGS was always not to get spotted. If you do, you just have to kill easily a whole bunch of enemies untill magicly no-one else is coming. Is that you definition of having fun? You must be kidding.....Gearharaden said:Just because you stick with the boring tranq gun doesn't mean everybody uses only that gun. Since when was playing a stealth game efficiently = to having fun?
You can turn that around easily. It make more sense to actually choose which wapons you need. Also, like I said before, the sacrifice would be a minimum in MGS cause in the end you would just have to choose if you want a sniper or an rocket launcher, since all the MGs in the game are practicly the same in terms of the damage you can make to the enemies. And THIS would add an great tactical component to the game.Imo it makes more sense to carry all the weapons because it's sorta like a compromise. If you only want one gun, you have it, if you use all of them, you have it.
It's realistic. And since Kojima always goes for realism in terms of the gameplay this would be a logical step forwards.The only thing you sacrifice is the fact that you don't see every single weapon on the character, which is stupid anyways.
Well, I would rather say it's that popular because it's more fun indeed.And the reason I reference Halo all the time is because it's the sole reason stuff like limited weapons carrying is popular now.
superbank said:If I ever play MGS4 I'm going to set it to the hardest difficulty level. If a solider sees me laying on the floor 2 feet away from him I want him to kick the shit out of me for being so stupid.
TheExorzist said:It's realistic. And since Kojima always goes for realism in terms of the gameplay this would be a logical step forwards.
TheExorzist said:Well, I would rather say it's that popular because it's more fun indeed.
joshcryer said:C'mon, as long as, I would think, that you were in his peripheral, you wouldn't be noticed. Of course, no one looks straight ahead as they walk, so I think it could only work if he was rounding a corner. I dunno, I think there could be periods on the hardest level where they wouldn't notice you. But I agree that if it's automagic hiding and they walk straight and past you, you do deserve to be kicked to shit and back.![]()
J2 Cool said:This is MGS4, supposedly the last chapter of the MGS series. Why alienate your well-earned core now?
bud said:so that was an amazing 15 min gameplay demo. it starts out completely stealthy and it ends with bombs exploding, a building collapsing, some tank getting bazooka'd (or whatever you call it) and rebels crying and thanking you for your help.
but the thing that's most awesome about it is that it only showed the humans. they didn't even show the gekko's in this part. *omg* that should be pretty awesome, you know, shooting at them and hiding from them and them trying to find you in some building with 2 other gekko's.
Zen said:Ever since MGS2 Kojima has been pushing harder and harder to remind you that you are in fact playing a videogame, that MGS isn't realistic. Personally I think it's a bold ambition, the reinforce to the player that they are playing a video game but at the same time immerse them and make them believe this totally implausible world that Snake inhabits.
I don't want MGS to strive for realism, I want it to strive to remind m..
Gearharaden said::lol Did you even actually play MGS1 or 2? In the first game you use a ketchup bottle to fool a jail guard into thinking you're dead. That's realism? Oh, how about in every game where Snake pulls a cardboard box out of his asshole? And then deactivating Claymore mines by crawling into them? Maybe the realism you're talking about is when you can use porno mags to distract guards right? Realism in gameplay? Please give me whatever you're smoking.
BenjaminBirdie said:It's kinda like (no, seriously, stay with me) in Die Hard when they dude goes through the rose bush and gets a thorn stuck in his finger. When he gets shot up a few seconds later, it heightens the impact. By spending that much time fighting with and against ragular humans, when something that ****ing huge busts through a building or whatever it's going to have a much more massive impact than if you just started off fighting all these giant robots and shit.
J2 Cool said:And about the 000000 system, I'm curious to what it was/is as well.
That was like... such bad wording and phrasing of your thoughtstest_account said:I dont think a single game is real-life realistic when it comes to it. There are always elements that doesnt make (insert game here) realistic. After all, it is a game. But still we use the word "realistic" for many games due to some elements looks very real compared to how it looks/works in real life.
Darkpen said:That was like... such bad wording and phrasing of your thoughtsI don't think any game should be called realistic unless the game forces ramifications on you for screwing up, just like real life. Sound familiar? It was called Steel Battalion. Reset save file FTL.
Chrono said:It's OOOO... or XXXX. Whatever the hell it is, I read he used Kanji or whatever.
Kojima said it's a system that many games will use, and they're keeping it secret. After he turned it on the team members said now that's next-gen or something like that.
~2 months until TGS, not too long now... Actually it is. Goddammit. :lol