• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Official NFL Week 7 Topic - Tame those Colts, Texans!

Status
Not open for further replies.
tmdorsey said:
WEEK 7

Sunday, Oct. 23
Detroit at Cleveland, 1:00 p.m.
Green Bay at Minnesota, 1:00 p.m.
Indianapolis at Houston, 1:00 p.m.
Kansas City at Miami, 1:00 p.m.
New Orleans at St. Louis, 1:00 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1:00 p.m.
San Diego at Philadelphia, 1:00 p.m.
San Francisco at Washington, 1:00 p.m.
Dallas at Seattle, 4:05 p.m.
Baltimore at Chicago, 4:15 p.m.
Buffalo at Oakland, 4:15 p.m.
Denver at N.Y. Giants, 4:15 p.m.
Tennessee at Arizona, 4:15 p.m.

Monday, Oct. 24
N.Y. Jets at Atlanta, 9:00 p.m.


EDIT: For the record I never said Vick was the best QB in the league, just that he's not as bad as people on GAF make him out to be

Well he's currently ranked #23 in the league in passing. Sounds about right. :)

Don't take it personally I'm messin with you. Although you did pick Dallas over Seattle. GRR
 
The Vick to Bettis comparison isn't very good. Bettis is like the 10th highest rusher ever, and Vick is never going to top any statistical category, or even the top 25. Sure he's a dual threat at the QB, and that's good for an offense which can utilize that, but he's not very good at passing and he's only 'pretty good' at running.
 
zesty said:
I'll take all the home teams, save for the Colts, of course.

And anyone who suggests that Peyton Manning is in cahoots with Tom Brady... well, there's a special ring of hell for blasphemy like that.

sooner or later, you will come to the painful conclusion. im sorry zesty, but peyton is the mastermind behind al-quaeda...
 
whytemyke said:
The Vick to Bettis comparison isn't very good. Bettis is like the 10th highest rusher ever, and Vick is never going to top any statistical category, or even the top 25. Sure he's a dual threat at the QB, and that's good for an offense which can utilize that, but he's not very good at passing and he's only 'pretty good' at running.

Man, I've never came across anyone that hates Vick as much as you do. Did he sleep with your sister or something?

Set an NFL playoff record for a quarterback with 119 rushing yards in the 2004 NFC Divisional Playoff Game against the Rams.
Became the first quarterback in NFL history to tally five career 100-yard rushing games by posting three in 2004.
Rushed for 902 yards with a 7.52 average per carry in 2004 to rank third in NFL annals for quarterbacks in both categories.
Became the first quarterback to ever throw for more than 250 yards and rush for over 100 yards in the same game in a performance against the Broncos (10/31/04).

Also, check to see who is first in Rushing average in the NFL this year so far.
 
siege said:
Man, I've never came across anyone that hates Vick as much as you do. Did he sleep with your sister or something?

Set an NFL playoff record for a quarterback with 119 rushing yards in the 2004 NFC Divisional Playoff Game against the Rams.
Became the first quarterback in NFL history to tally five career 100-yard rushing games by posting three in 2004.
Rushed for 902 yards with a 7.52 average per carry in 2004 to rank third in NFL annals for quarterbacks in both categories.
Became the first quarterback to ever throw for more than 250 yards and rush for over 100 yards in the same game in a performance against the Broncos (10/31/04).

Also, check to see who is first in Rushing average in the NFL this year so far.

I dunno...call me crazy but I thought a quarterback is supposed to throw the ball not run it.
 
maynerd said:
I dunno...call me crazy but I thought a quarterback is supposed to throw the ball not run it.

Actually, the rules of the game dictate that they can either run or pass the ball. It's just rare for an athlete to be able to do both as well as Vick.

I bet all you people who bitch about Vick and are fans of sub par teams wouldn't be talking shit if he were winning games for you. Just how it goes I guess.
 
siege said:
Actually, the rules of the game dictate that they can either run or pass the ball. It's just rare for an athlete to be able to do both as well as Vick.

There are at least half a dozen running backs who can run the ball as well as Vick, and I'm pretty damned sure they can't be much worse than he is at throwing the ball.

edit: Also, Bettis is the 5th highest gaining running back ever. I still don't get the comparison at all, by the way. Just saying that calling him the 10th leading rusher is a bit of a disservice to him.
 
Archaix said:
There are at least half a dozen running backs who can run the ball as well as Vick, and I'm pretty damned sure they can't be much worse than he is at throwing the ball.

Do you watch every game he plays in or just look at the stats afterwards? His completion rate isn't what it is because he isn't a good passer.
 
siege said:
Do you watch every game he plays in or just look at the stats afterwards? His completion rate isn't what it is because he isn't a good passer.

Exactly, and I'm pretty sure one of the things a QB needs to be considered a great QB is...dare I say it? Passing skills.

edit: Nevermind, I thought you admitted that his completion rate IS what it is because he isn't a good passer...which means you think he's a good passer?
 
siege said:
Do you watch every game he plays in or just look at the stats afterwards? His completion rate isn't what it is because he isn't a good passer.

No, he's really not a good passer. His completion percentage, quarterback rating, TD:INT ratio, yards per attempt, and overall yards are all near the league's worst. He's not a good passer. He changes the running game a great deal and allows for Dunn and Duckett to be far more productive than they otherwise would(And gives the Falcons the best chance to win), but he is a horrible passer. You can't argue this and claim to be at all objective.
 
siege said:
Actually, the rules of the game dictate that they can either run or pass the ball. It's just rare for an athlete to be able to do both as well as Vick.

I bet all you people who bitch about Vick and are fans of sub par teams wouldn't be talking shit if he were winning games for you. Just how it goes I guess.

Hmm...Do BOTH as well?

He may be better than average as a running quarterback but his passing stats STINK!

Career #s
55% Completion rating (67.6 completion rating for Manning last year)
76.9 QB rating (121.1 QB rating for Manning last year)
41 touchdowns - 5th year in the NFL (49 TDs for Manning LAST year alone)

But that's unfair to compare him to the #1 QB last year right? Ok well I agree maybe it is.

Let's look at total production last year.

2313 Passing yards + 902 Rushing yards = 3215 Yds this put him at 15th in the league in total yard production for QBs and I didn't even count rushing yards for other QBs.

14 Passing TDs + 3 Rushing TDs = 17 TDs this puts him at tied for 20th in the league in TD production by a QB and I didn't even bother checking rushing TDs for other QBs so he could be lower.

I don't get why anyone thinks he's that good.
 
maynerd said:
Hmm...Do BOTH as well?

He may be better than average as a running quarterback but his passing stats STINK!

Career #s
55% Completion rating (67.6 completion rating for Manning last year)
76.9 QB rating (121.1 QB rating for Manning last year)
41 touchdowns - 5th year in the NFL (49 TDs for Manning LAST year alone)

But that's unfair to compare him to the #1 QB last year right? Ok well I agree maybe it is.

Let's look at total production last year.

2313 Passing yards + 902 Rushing yards = 3215 Yds this put him at 15th in the league in total yard production for QBs and I didn't even count rushing yards for other QBs.

14 Passing TDs + 3 Rushing TDs = 17 TDs this puts him at tied for 20th in the league in TD production by a QB and I didn't even bother checking rushing TDs for other QBs so he could be lower.

I don't get why anyone thinks he's that good.

vick.jpg
 
siege said:
Actually, the rules of the game dictate that they can either run or pass the ball. It's just rare for an athlete to be able to do both as well as Vick.

I bet all you people who bitch about Vick and are fans of sub par teams wouldn't be talking shit if he were winning games for you. Just how it goes I guess.
... but he doesn't do both well. He only does one of them well.

Did you know that Schaub put up better numbers as a QB in one game than Vick has done all season? Schaub played about 1 and a half games and has completed nearly half as many passes and has half as many attempts for half as many yards... with 3 TDs and 0 turnovers to Vicks 5 TDs, 3 INTs and who knows how many fumbles. That is not a good quarterback. That's a good runningback playing QB.
 
Vick is an average passer, which, in the NFL where teams don't run the option and there is no Nebraska to play at, makes you an average QB, and all the hype and endorsements and Sportscenter highlights in the world aren't gonna change that.
 
maynerd said:
I don't get why anyone thinks he's that good.


Last season he was running under a new offensive scheme. It was also only his 2nd full season. The guy is only 25 years old, so he's got a lot of room to improve. I'm not saying he's one of the best quarterbacks of all time, nor will he ever be. However, he's a lot better than people give him credit for on this forum. It doesn't necessarily show in his stats each week, but he's one QB defenses around the league hate to face.

If every team had a recieving corp of Harrison, Wayne, and Stokely - it's likely they'd throw 30+ TD's a year as well. If you watch every Falcons game like I do, you'd know their wide outs are pretty damn horrible. Jenkins has potential and Finneran is pretty reliable when they actually involve him, but there are a ton of dropped balls every game. Crumpler has the best hands on the team and is Vicks main target, but he's no replacement for a top end WR like Harrison, Owens, Holt, etc.
 
siege said:
If every team had a recieving corp of Harrison, Wayne, and Stokely

1999 BAL 28 yards
2000 BAL 184 yards
2001 BAL 344 yards
2002 BAL 357 yards
2003 IND 211 yards*
2004 IND 1077 yards


*6 games
 
whytemyke said:
... but he doesn't do both well. He only does one of them well.

Did you know that Schaub put up better numbers as a QB in one game than Vick has done all season? Schaub played about 1 and a half games and has completed nearly half as many passes and has half as many attempts for half as many yards... with 3 TDs and 0 turnovers to Vicks 5 TDs, 3 INTs and who knows how many fumbles. That is not a good quarterback. That's a good runningback playing QB.

Schaub can't run, that's why he had 300 yards on 34 attempts. Vick usually doesn't even have 20 attempts a game. Keep in mind he didn't even play in that game, so his low TD total thus far isn't an accurate indication of him being unable to score. Brady who leads the league in passing only has 8 TD's/4 ints. So Vick has 2 less total TD's than the leading QB despite playing one less game.
 
seriously, we'll see what happens to Wayne when he (probably) leaves next year. I predict his production drops bigtime. Peyton has as much to do with his recievers success, if not more, than they do to his. You can't plug any QB, especially not Vick, into Indy and expect it to run the same.
 
siege said:
Last season he was running under a new offensive scheme. It was also only his 2nd full season. The guy is only 25 years old, so he's got a lot of room to improve. I'm not saying he's one of the best quarterbacks of all time, nor will he ever be. However, he's a lot better than people give him credit for on this forum. It doesn't necessarily show in his stats each week, but he's one QB defenses around the league hate to face.

If every team had a recieving corp of Harrison, Wayne, and Stokely - it's likely they'd throw 30+ TD's a year as well. If you watch every Falcons game like I do, you'd know their wide outs are pretty damn horrible. Jenkins has potential and Finneran is pretty reliable when they actually involve him, but there are a ton of dropped balls every game. Crumpler has the best hands on the team and is Vicks main target, but he's no replacement for a top end WR like Harrison, Owens, Holt, etc.

Ok he's 25 years old I give you that he needs some time to mature. But right now he's putting his entire game in his legs. He is going to slow down as he gets older. He is not showing any quality passing ability.

Yes defenses hate to play him because he runs better than he passes so it makes him a little less predictable. I really am surprised he doesn't pass better than he does. Most defenses will allow him to beat them with the pass than the run.

Not everyone has the colts WRs this is true. But when you are below the middle of the pack in just about every passing stat it, well...I think you get the picture. He is averaging about 120 yds passing a game man, that is HORRIBLE. He is averaging 1 TD per game started over his carrer that's pretty bad as well. You don't need superstar receivers to be a quality QB. You just need to be able to read defenses and find the open man.

Seahawks lead the league for the last 2 years in dropped passes. So, don't give me that lame dropped passes excuse.
 
siege said:
Schaub can't run, that's why he had 300 yards on 34 attempts. Vick usually doesn't even have 20 attempts a game. Keep in mind he didn't even play in that game, so his low TD total thus far isn't an accurate indication of him being unable to score. Brady who leads the league in passing only has 8 TD's/4 ints. So Vick has 2 less total TD's than the leading QB despite playing one less game.

Brady leads the league in Passing YARDS. Then you compare TDs?

Lets compare Yards

Brady - 1821 Yards
Vick - 607 Yards

Now if you want to compare TDs and TD leaders.

Carson Palmer - 13 TDs/2 Ints
Vick - 5 TDs/3 Ints

Very sad numbers.
 
Ash Housewares said:
blah Vick, I'm happy with Brees & LT instead of him

I'd be happier with LT as well. He's the best player in the league. I'm not sold on Brees yet. He was horrible until he got McCardell and Gates to throw to.
 
maynerd said:
Brady leads the league in Passing YARDS. Then you compare TDs?

Lets compare Yards

Brady - 1821 Yards
Vick - 607 Yards

Now if you want to compare TDs and TD leaders.

Carson Palmer - 13 TDs/2 Ints
Vick - 5 TDs/3 Ints

Very sad numbers.


:lol :lol :lol I was done arguing about vick in here, but GOD those numbers Blow! Imagine if the Falcons had a QB who could actually throw the ball. They might be undefeated
 
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6276565.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP

After the NFL moved the Miami Dolphins-Kansas City Chiefs NFL game to Friday night due to Hurricane Wilma, CBS said it will show the game in five selected local markets.

The game, which will kick off at 7 p.m. ET in Miami, will air on CBS affiliates in Miami (WFOR), West Palm Beach (WPEC), Fort Myers (WINK), Kansas City (KCTV) and Topeka (WIBW) – which combine to make up 3.47% of the country’s viewership.


The rest of the nation will see CBS’s regularly-scheduled Friday-night lineup of Ghost Whisperer, Threshold and Numb3rs, in conjunction with the NFL's long-standing policy of not wanting to conflict with high school and college games.

However, fans outside of these markets will be unable to see the game live at all, even for subscribers of the DirecTV “Sunday Ticket” NFL package, which does not have the rights outside of its Sunday window.

The NFL will, however, air the game via delay on its NFL Network Sunday night at a time to be determined.
 
I'd be happier with LT as well. He's the best player in the league. I'm not sold on Brees yet. He was horrible until he got McCardell and Gates to throw to.

:lol Trying to plant those seeds huh? Aikman was bad until he got Irvin and Moose. Montana? Nothing without Rice.

Fact of the matter is this. The Eagles made it to 3 NFC championships with Todd Stinkston as their #1. McNabb didn't suddenly become amazing with the addition of Owens. I find it amazing that Tom Brady is doing what he is doing in this league in the way he is doing it. He passes to everyone, and not a single player is even an above average receiver, save maybe Branch.
 
However, fans outside of these markets will be unable to see the game live at all, even for subscribers of the DirecTV “Sunday Ticket” NFL package, which does not have the rights outside of its Sunday window.

man that is bullcrap. WHAT DO I PAY YOU FOR DIRECTV!
 
The game, which will kick off at 7 p.m. ET in Miami, will air on CBS affiliates in Miami (WFOR), West Palm Beach (WPEC), Fort Myers (WINK), Kansas City (KCTV) and Topeka (WIBW) – which combine to make up 3.47% of the country’s viewership.


The rest of the nation will see CBS’s regularly-scheduled Friday-night lineup of Ghost Whisperer, Threshold and Numb3rs, in conjunction with the NFL's long-standing policy of not wanting to conflict with high school and college games.

However, fans outside of these markets will be unable to see the game live at all, even for subscribers of the DirecTV “Sunday Ticket” NFL package, which does not have the rights outside of its Sunday window.

You have to be fucking kidding me. Why the fuck does the NFL pull shit like this. Its like they go out of their way to piss off fans every chance they can.
 
TheDuce22 said:
You have to be fucking kidding me. Why the fuck does the NFL pull shit like this. Its like they go out of their way to piss off fans every chance they can.

I'm pretty sure it's more to do with the contracts with CBS than the NFL not wanting to show a game. The advertisers for all the pre-empted programs would have to be reimbursed and it would just get quite sticky.

Don't forget to make your Yahoo picks all, have to be done by tomorrow at 3 or so!
 
Poor Maddox.

http://kdka.com/topstories/local_story_293220117.html

Fan Support Lacking For Maddox

Oct 20, 2005 9:58 pm US/Eastern
Pittsburgh (KDKA) Some Steelers fans have crossed the line in their treatment of quarterback Tommy Maddox.

The backlash of last Sunday’s loss to the Jaguars has been way beyond anything that Maddox has experienced during his NFL career.

“Obviously you want to play better,” Maddox said. “I want all that to kind of die and go away.”

KDKA's John Shumway reports that Maddox’s Steelers teammates came to his defense, including starting quarterback Ben Roethlisberger.

“People take things way too far,” Roethlisberger said. “If you want to get on someone when they’re on the field, that’s one thing. But to take it outside to their personal life their family life, that’s totally different.”

According to reports, Maddox's agent says fans have been lashing out against the quarterback's family, upset over his performance Sunday.

Maddox threw three interceptions, including one returned for a touchdown in overtime.

Fans have apparently thrown debris into his yard.

Agent Vann McElroy says Maddox's wife has had to drive their children to school to shield them from abuse.

McElroy says fans need to take a step back and realize what's best for Maddox and his family.

Maddox politely refused an interview for a story on the abuse in today's Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, saying only that he wants the abuse to just go away.

“You start taking it outside the field to the house, to the kids - to me you’ve crossed the line,” said head coach Bill Cowher. “It’s a classless thing to do.”

He played like shit and acted like an asshole, but damn, keep it on the field people. Bringing his kids into it is ridiculous.
 
I'm pretty sure it's more to do with the contracts with CBS than the NFL not wanting to show a game. The advertisers for all the pre-empted programs would have to be reimbursed and it would just get quite sticky.

That doesnt make any sense. Why not just pick up the local broadcast and air it on Sunday Ticket.
 
Oh come on, I doubt anybody threw anything into his yard. I'm sure it was just the famous Pittsburgh inconsistant winds.
 
TheDuce22 said:
That doesnt make any sense. Why not just pick up the local broadcast and air it on Sunday Ticket.

The whole NFL TV thing is all about contracts, The Sunday Ticket one only means they can show Sunday games on Direct TV, probably had to be agreed on so CBS/FOX/ESPN wouldn't be pushed out for other games.
 
Archaix said:
Oh come on, I doubt anybody threw anything into his yard. I'm sure it was just the famous Pittsburgh inconsistant winds.

:lol

His wife said no one threw anything in their yard and that she didn't know of anyone harassing her kids so the report is pretty inconsistent.

Tommy could have avoided all of this if he took that defeat like a man instead of blaming everything else around him.
 
The whole NFL TV thing is all about contracts, The Sunday Ticket one only means they can show Sunday games on Direct TV, probably had to be agreed on so CBS/FOX/ESPN wouldn't be pushed out for other games.

Sunday ticket is only brodcasting fox and cbs games. Why dont fox and cbs fall under that same "sunday window" rule. Apparently this game shouldnt be viewed by anyone, anywhere because its on friday.
 
its bullshit dude. why can't we see the game? they pulled this same crap with the steelers-dolphins game last year for the same reason. why would it hurt to let people in other parts of the country see the game?? what advertisers would they have to reimburse? i'm not saying they should abandon my local CBS programming, im saying direct should have the game on for sunday ticket subscribers. how is this any different than what they do now?
 
Season record: 49-39
Last week: 11-3

WEEK 7

Sunday, Oct. 23
Detroit at Cleveland, 1:00 p.m.
Green Bay at Minnesota, 1:00 p.m.
Indianapolis at Houston, 1:00 p.m.
Kansas City at Miami, now on Friday night
New Orleans at St. Louis, 1:00 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1:00 p.m.
San Diego at Philadelphia, 1:00 p.m.
San Francisco at Washington, 1:00 p.m.
Dallas at Seattle, 4:05 p.m.
Baltimore at Chicago, 4:15 p.m.
Buffalo at Oakland, 4:15 p.m.
Denver at N.Y. Giants, 4:15 p.m.
Tennessee at Arizona, 4:15 p.m.

Monday, Oct. 24
N.Y. Jets at Atlanta, 9:00 p.m.

Open date: Carolina, Jacksonville, New England, Tampa Bay
 
siege said:
I'd be happier with LT as well. He's the best player in the league. I'm not sold on Brees yet. He was horrible until he got McCardell and Gates to throw to.

and Vick is still horrible, point?

not like we don't have Rivers too :)
 
fuck...could use some fantasy help.

someone offered me Jamal Lewis for Shockey.
My other RBs are Dillon, Mike Anderson, and Mewelde Moore....not exactly a great line-up.

Now while Lewis hasn't exactly torn it up this year, I'm leaning toward accepting it. What do you guys think?
 
Eminem said:
fuck...could use some fantasy help.

someone offered me Jamal Lewis for Shockey.
My other RBs are Dillon, Mike Anderson, and Mewelde Moore....not exactly a great line-up.

Now while Lewis hasn't exactly torn it up this year, I'm leaning toward accepting it. What do you guys think?
well, you've only got about 5 awesome TEs in the league, so besides that everyone else is pretty much on par with each other. However, Jamal Lewis isn't going to get his running game going until the passing game starts up in Baltimore, so really you'd have to see whether you can afford to miss points until Boller comes back. If he is back in a couple weeks, I'd go for the trade. If he's gone for awhile longer though, I don't think I'd accept it. I mean, shockey right now is a guaranteed TD a game, while Lewis isn't.

Edit: Speaking of Trades, I wish the people whom I offered trades to were at least timely in responding, even if they shoot them down. It'd be nice to know the reaction I get on my trades... but nobody even looks at them in my one league, I think.
 
Eminem said:
fuck...could use some fantasy help.

someone offered me Jamal Lewis for Shockey.
My other RBs are Dillon, Mike Anderson, and Mewelde Moore....not exactly a great line-up.

Now while Lewis hasn't exactly torn it up this year, I'm leaning toward accepting it. What do you guys think?

Lewis stinks this year. I'd keep Shockey.
 
siege said:
I'd be happier with LT as well. He's the best player in the league. I'm not sold on Brees yet. He was horrible until he got McCardell and Gates to throw to.

Hey the Steelers shut LT down in San Diego. The guy isn't unstoppable.
 
bionic77 said:
Hey the Steelers shut LT down in San Diego. The guy isn't unstoppable.

Actually Dallas, Devner, and Pittsburg have held him under 100 yds rushing. But it's interesting to note all of those games he was given the ball less than 20 times and the chargers lost all three games. It's clear that the only way to stop LT is to not give him the ball. :)
 
Well, Em, everyone here on GAF says that Shockey is overrated. Using that logic I think you are getting the deal of a century.

Being of sane mind, however, Shockey is realistically the #2 receiver on the Giants, and they will look for him in the redzone. I think you'd have to be a f00l to get rid of him. Take into consideration that Eli is getting better, not worse.
 
Every Yahoo NFL analyst is picking Chicago over Baltimore.... I THINK that's funny... I'm not sure if I'll be laughing come Sunday though....
 
Wellington said:
Well, Em, everyone here on GAF says that Shockey is overrated. Using that logic I think you are getting the deal of a century.

Being of sane mind, however, Shockey is realistically the #2 receiver on the Giants, and they will look for him in the redzone. I think you'd have to be a f00l to get rid of him. Take into consideration that Eli is getting better, not worse.

Not me! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom