The hype rage is one of the most endearing aspects about this forum.
While I don't mind pulling back the OT release, let's always provide/maintain a safe haven for the bubble gut enthusiasts.
Sample: Super Smash Bros. for Wii U POTD Thread 17
Whats the difference of thread like this from |OT| released a week early ?
sure, but its been going on since like mid 2013 way before the 3DS version's release date even announced.
Smash had up to 15 or 16 discussion threads... The official OT went up a week in advance of release I believe.
This post nailed it. I think a max 48 hours prior policy is the best way to go, with the fewest compromises.I echo the 'release day may be too late' sentiments. Maybe 24 hours (max 48 hours) before hand? A week before is definitely too long given this forum's pace.
IIRC, We also had a seperate thread for those streams.Sounds good. Though I will miss everyone discussing live streams the weekend before a game launches. The GTA V OT with everyone frantically searching for streams before Rockstar's ninjas could take them out was pretty fun.
So guys, this is kinda off topic (but not really). How are we gonna handle Bayonetta?
I think there are a lot of people, like me, who want to play the Digital Foundry anointed definitive edition original on Wii U before jumping into the sequel. So will we have to bump the old Bayo 1 thread or can we have a new one for the Wii U release? I'm just curious.
Also, as someone first suggested on the first page, I do like the idea of day before release. I think it'll work great to get the hype started just before release. I suspect people will be busy playing day of release and the thread will be pretty barebones of actual discussion until much later, once everyone's put the game down to come up for air. I could be wrong though. I'm fine either way.
Great change.
How about similarly defined threads to go along with it? Like |HT| the official hype thread (gets closed when the |OT| opens), |ST| the official spoiler thread (opens along the |OT|, prominently linked there), |LT| the official leaks thread (for everything leaked before release, gets closed when the |OT| opens) etc.
Edit: If there won't be |HT|s I'd like to suggest a more consequential application of "new threads for new news", the closing post of closed old news threads should (ideally always) contain the link to the newer news thread that replaced them. This would allow readers to go along with the news without getting lost in a lot of concurrent threads, and without an overly huge "hub thread".
You will always have more and less vocal participants. I honestly don't think the vocal ones will go away without a central hype thread, they likely just turn all the news threads into hype ones. And those who try to follow news and avoid the hype then possibly are worse off than now where threads with significant news exist but hype concentrates in some hub threads.But if you have hype threads the regulars there will just move over to the OT the second it's made and the same enclosed, hype-centric club attitude will have been fostered for the OT. If a place isn't around in prior days to work everyone up for the OT, it might help the OT contain more actual discussion, and differing viewpoints.
I wonder if it would be possible to somehow (and someplace - Community?) sticky the locked OT so that people can still get information about the game/release before the release date, yet still have it go live on Gaming on the actual day of release.
I would also like to know this.IIRC, We also had a seperate thread for those streams.
I also repeat my other question.
What about off topic OT's?
I also repeat my other question.
What about off topic OT's?
I guess I'll be the outsider who doesn't like the idea.
I want to talk about a game leading up to its release. Discuss trailers, go over early impressions, discuss Twitch streams, find unboxings on YouTube, talk about achievements, stores selling early, pre order bonuses, etc, etc....
I guess... What's the "harm" in having it up for a few days before release? The conversation is already going? Eh, I've never complained, even when jumping into an OT two weeks after release.
Oh, good! Best to stick with the tried-and-true one week before release there.This has nothing to do with off-topic. This is posted exclusively in the gaming forum for that reason.
Yup, it's business as usual over on the Off-Topic side for now, and we'll let you know if anything changes.Oh, good! Best to stick with the tried-and-true one week before release there.
Agreed. I also think this would hurt several indie titles. I hear about most only here on NeoGAF, and it's usually through OTs. I think the launch day rule is only effective for AAA titles, but even that can work against a gaffer who wants up-to-minute updates and info.I understand but I think the day of is too last minute, I think the day before would be best.
Not really. The whole point here, as already said, is to encourage people to discuss about the game they're currently playing, not about the game they're planning to purchase or that they're hyping to uncontrolled levels.This is a completely unnecessary change. Pre-release OTs are a great source of information, a fun way to get in on the hype and usually contains some impressions from people who got it early. Now it's either going to be scattered through several threads and/or we will start making "hype" mega threads that pretty much mirror OTs anyway.
Nothing seemed broken with the current system. This feels like a change for the sake of change, IMO.
Not really. The whole point here, as already said, is to encourage people to discuss about the game they're currently playing, not about the game they're planning to purchase or that they're hyping to uncontrolled levels.
And although I do agree that there wasn't anything wrong in the old approach per se, it doesn't mean that the new one couldn't be even better. It just makes more sense.
"making it difficult for people jumping in on release day to find what they're looking for or to follow the already-rapid pace of conversation"
I would take that you didn't really follow Smash news. There is reason why Smash threads happened because we are getting daily updates from Sakurai, whom posted new information on Miiverse and Smashbros.com. Now Smash 3DS is already out but we almost know nothing about Wii U version (Exclusive modes, etc)
Well, we are still getting new information based on Wii U version daily so that's what POTD thread for. Sometime, new informations that we are getting are not even big deal to warrant a new thread.
He's right. We had 17 Smash threads for Picture of the Day (POTD) so most of times, we actually got new information from Sakurai's post of the day that are not relevant enough to warrant new threads.
From top of my head, I think POTD thread is going to be locked on Dec 6 after the games getting release in all region.
for popular games, a week can produce a gigantic thread, making it difficult for people jumping in on release day to find what they're looking for or to follow the already-rapid pace of conversation.
They're absolutely chat room threads, which we're not particularly fond of. That said, the sheer volume of info coming out on a regular basis for Smash is always far beyond what happens for other games, so that's why we allowed those threads to continue. It's a special case and shouldn't be used as a barometer for anything else, at least in my opinion.How is POTD different from hype thread that we're trying to avoid? You raised a good point that POTD exists because there is a new info daily but it's hard to believe that the discussions in those thread are all about only daily pictures. It meant, POTD 16th reached 20,000 comments in 3 days. Are you saying those 20,000 comments are all about 3 pictures?
Awesome. Thanks.I'm making an OT for the Wii U port of Bayonetta whereas Nemesis_ is making the OT for Bayonetta 2.
That's the absolute minority on a thread like this, if I recall correctly by past OTs.The explaination of...
...isn't an issue because the conversation naturally changes as the game comes out so people can freely and easily jump in at any time to post their impressions.
Now it'll be confusing and forced. Gamers who get the game early won't have an OT to post in so their impressions will be scattered in several threads. Gamers who don't have the game when the OT comes out will still be posting their "plan to purchase" or hype.
How is POTD different from hype thread that we're trying to avoid? You raised a good point that POTD exists because there is a new info daily but it's hard to believe that the discussions in those thread are all about only daily pictures. It meant, POTD 16th reached 20,000 comments in 3 days. Are you saying those 20,000 comments are all about 3 pictures?
It might be kinda messy but the only thing that comes to mind is still have the OT made and up a week(or less) ahead of time, stickied but locked, and unlocked/unstickied at the release time so people can get the information part.
How is POTD different from hype thread that we're trying to avoid? You raised a good point that POTD exists because there is a new info daily but it's hard to believe that the discussions in those thread are all about only daily pictures. It meant, POTD 16th reached 20,000 comments in 3 days. Are you saying those 20,000 comments are all about 3 pictures?
I guess I'll be the outsider who doesn't like the idea.
I want to talk about a game leading up to its release. Discuss trailers, go over early impressions, discuss Twitch streams, find unboxings on YouTube, talk about achievements, stores selling early, pre order bonuses, etc, etc....
I guess... What's the "harm" in having it up for a few days before release? The conversation is already going? Eh, I've never complained, even when jumping into an OT two weeks after release.
Can we kill review threads too? If reviews are available before launch, the information can go in the OP and be discussed there. Otherwise they will surely become surrogate OTs
Can we kill review threads too? If reviews are available before launch, the information can go in the OP and be discussed there. Otherwise they will surely become surrogate OTs