So, you're okay with what ever they do because they created Xbox Live?
Nah, that's every month, and somehow he's still around.
Lol these predictions aren't his actual job...
Actually, they are.
You've got to be joking. There are plenty of people who are rooting for the XB1 to fail. All because they tried to sell people a product they found unacceptable.
It's like rooting for Coke to go out of business because you hated the New Coke they introduced in the 80's. Only New Coke never actually came out.
Eh its not really like that; New Coke was just a product that people didnt like. They could buy a can/bottle, decide they hate it and move on without much fuss.
If Microsoft had their way with the XBO people would have been stuck with a device that took some of their rights away, restricted their gaming abilities through mandatory daily online checks, taken peoples ability away to sell/lend a physical game etc.
And remember the only reason this didnt come out was because Microsoft saw their pre-order numbers and panicked because demand was nowhere near what they arrogantly assumed it would be.
I say arrogantly because we had rumours of their plans at least 6-9 months before announcement and 99% of people hated what they read. Some insisted that it wouldnt happen or that MS would see the threads and realise people wouldnt want it but what happened? They went along with their plans anyway and then wondered why no one wanted it, especially in comparison to the PS4.
I have owned an Xbox, 2 Xbox 360s and I honestly wouldnt feel a thing if MS left the console space. They did help usher along online gaming (After the Dreamcast and PS2 of course) and they have had some great games (Voodoo Vince was a favourite of mine) but they have probably done a lot more bad for the industry than good and I fear for the day they become dominant and shape the market how they want it because that is the day of no return.
My god...
I can't believe people actually think this way.
They're not perfect, I agree, but Xbox Live changed the way I play video games ever since it's conception (I'm not a PC gamer, or BIG into it at least).
Actually they are not.
Yup, we got a $599 console precisely because there *was* competition, not because of the lack of it. Sony felt pressured to overspend and overachieve to meet their competition on as many fronts as possible. Not unlike what MS tried to do with the intro of the XBO this time around. Seems it's difficult in the console market to resist the allure of overextending the product as a means to face competition.
Well, Microsoft did introduce the bullshit idea that it's acceptable to charge for P2P online. And now Sony has jumped on this, obviously. It's quite sad that I've seen people actively defend this in the past.
At least now Microsoft is using dedicated servers.
A couple games versus the entire system requiring always online is quite the difference. It was a fucked up, idiotic idea. MS got the slap in the face they deserved. I'd still love to see them come back and compete. I'll probs pick a One up next fall.This.
Ask anyone here why hate the X1 today and many of those reasons will be stuff that is not even featured on a X1 you can buy today at the store.
Funny tho that Destiny and 2K15 (e.g.) require you to be always online just like MS envisioned and many guys I know went all-digital anyways because the US store is so much cheaper than the EU one and preloading rewards.
today is the day which will define Patchers prediction career.
This.
Ask anyone here why hate the X1 today and many of those reasons will be stuff that is not even featured on a X1 you can buy today at the store.
Funny tho that Destiny and 2K15 (e.g.) require you to be always online just like MS envisioned and many guys I know went all-digital anyways because the US store is so much cheaper than the EU one and preloading rewards.
Oh dont get me wrong, im not saying that Sony is doing any of this out of the goodness of their heart, far from it. Im just saying that while they did have a vested interest in getting Blu-Ray going, it did also help give developers more space to work with without the hassle of multiple DVD discs. It also gave people a very affordable Blu Ray player that was upgradable through firmware updates.The ps3 was expensive because they shoehorned in the blu-ray player expecting another ps2 whitewash, and the quick recuperation of the investment. It wasnt a gift from sony, and it was also there to help establish the format.... Which they have a big stake in.
We all saw what they wrote on their financials this year regarding blu-ray.
It shocks me reading some of the things that people write in regards to sony. Like they are an overgenerous uncle. Giving us 800 dollars worth of kit at a cutdown price...
I think that the ps3 is a prime example of a company that believes that it can do as it pleases. They found out the hardway, just like microsoft doing now with the xbone
This is total bullshit and a very popular urban legend. But yeah... if it makes you feel good, please continue...
My god...
I can't believe people actually think this way.
They're not perfect, I agree, but Xbox Live changed the way I play video games ever since it's conception (I'm not a PC gamer, or BIG into it at least).
Pretty much. There's a lot of this that goes on and these types just love to use how MS "almost killed gaming" as a reason to fuel said hate lol.So it has nothing to do with XB1 and their initial always online strategy. You just hate the company if you feel that way.
You said this:
Which is wrong. MS was getting bad reactions independent of Sony's good reactions around the time of DRMgate. Sony simply rode the wave that communities like GAF had created, and then after a while the anti-MS opinion merged with a pro-Sony one as Sony continued to build up a snowball of customer goodwill.
Eh it’s not really like that; New Coke was just a product that people didn’t like. They could buy a can/bottle, decide they hate it and move on without much fuss.
If Microsoft had their way with the XBO people would have been stuck with a device that took some of their rights away, restricted their gaming abilities through mandatory daily online checks, taken people’s ability away to sell/lend a physical game etc.
And remember the only reason this didn’t come out was because Microsoft saw their pre-order numbers and panicked because demand was nowhere near what they arrogantly assumed it would be.
I say arrogantly because we had rumours of their plans at least 6-9 months before announcement and 99% of people hated what they read. Some insisted that it wouldn’t happen or that MS would see the threads and realise people wouldn’t want it but what happened? They went along with their plans anyway and then wondered why no one wanted it, especially in comparison to the PS4.
I have owned an Xbox, 2 Xbox 360’s and I honestly wouldn’t feel a thing if MS left the console space. They did help usher along online gaming (After the Dreamcast and PS2 of course) and they have had some great games (Voodoo Vince was a favourite of mine) but they have probably done a lot more bad for the industry than good and I fear for the day they become dominant and shape the market how they want it because that is the day of no return.
No, it's a lot more like hoping New Coke crashes and burns so they'll go back to making Coke Classic. Which is, thankfully, exactly what happened. I'm sure there are some who wish Microsoft ill but there are many more who yearn for a return to the days when there was J Allard-like vision for how to improve gaming.
Buying exclusivity from third parties doesn't improve gaming. Features that let me watch TV at the same time as my game don't improve gaming. Kinect, sadly, didn't improve gaming beyond enabling Dance Central. Your analogy fails on several levels.
The fact that you add a beta to your argument says it all.
Well, they did introduce online multiplayer fee, started the DLC timed exclusive deals (feel free to correct me on that), ... The original vision of the Xbox One was pretty scary too. Their tendency to contract external studios or buy out exclusivity deals rather than building up their own studio portfolio could also be considered as a bad thing...
There are plenty of acceptable reasons to think that way. I don't necessarily agree with those, but it's not that stupid.
He's an analyst. His industry "predictions", obviously not just NPD, often form the basis of investment decisions for his clients.
What? I don't think you guys know what he does for a living.
Say what? The ONLY reason they're not featured on the Xbone is because people kicked up a fuss about the shit they were trying to pull and MS were forced to backtrack on pretty much everything they said.This.
Ask anyone here why hate the X1 today and many of those reasons will be stuff that is not even featured on a X1 you can buy today at the store.
These predictions are as he said more or less "just for fun" and don´t reflect what he takes into account to give advice to his clients.
Sony and MS also to accounts he does not follow AFAIK.
So Bruce what's your take? Think Pachter is way off base then?
Pretty much. There's a lot of this that goes on and these types just love to use how MS "almost killed gaming" as a reason to fuel said hate lol.
Some of the things you listed didn't even start with Microsoft, why do people still think Microsoft started things that Sony did way earlier.
Anyways, I don't feel like arguing with people who are pretty set in stone in anti-MS sentiment.
Think what you want, you're entitled to an opinion.
OT:
Pachter is a fool, always has been. We'll have proof of this later today. Been saying this for a long time.
Say what? The ONLY reason they're not featured on the Xbone is because people kicked up a fuss about the shit they were trying to pull and MS were forced to backtrack on pretty much everything they said.
Some of the things you listed didn't even start with Microsoft, why do people still think Microsoft started things that Sony did way earlier.
Anyways, I don't feel like arguing with people who are pretty set in stone in anti-MS sentiment.
Think what you want, you're entitled to an opinion.
OT:
Pachter is a fool, always has been. We'll have proof of this later today. Been saying this for a long time.
#WeAreAllHypocrites
Call me when the first single player game does this.
The fact that you add a beta to your argument says it all.
Pachter isn't a fool. Do you really think he would be where he is if he knew nothing? You're the fool if you believe that.
You can't go past the welcome screen in Destiny if you are not online.
So no story missions are playable offline too.
I'd say that MyCareer on 2K is an offline mode too (its like Career mode in FIFA if you don't know 2K so much) and you can only fully enjoy it if you are connected to the 2K servers.
(they have an offline version of the mode, but there you can't buy shoes, swag and tattoos etc. for your player).
Can I call you now?
what could be the possible reason If this is true.
I don't see why they couldn't. If their next system is a gimmick-free* gaming system and is on par (similar power/architecture)with the ps5, then why not? Whenever the question of xbone losing third party support due to low sales pops up, it is met with near unanimous answers stating that the xbone is so similar in architecture that it would be crazy to write off support. If Nintendo gets the finger out and works on network infrastructure, third party relations, such as good dev tools and documentation, then I don't see why they couldn't compete with Sony.
I was a little harsh, edited my post.Pachter isn't a fool. Do you really think he would be where he is if he knew nothing? You're the fool if you believe that.
Will patcher get banned from here if hes wrong again?
Will patcher get banned from here if hes wrong again?
Also completely forgetting retail games which released earlier in the year (I:SS, TLoUR, TF) and also digital titles.
Will patcher get banned from here if hes wrong again?