• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Pachter thinks Xbox One will now sell as many units as PS4

Except you can play all those games on the PS4 which is $100 cheaper.

COD, BF4 have exclusive content for the Xbox One, plus the 360 versions of COD and BF sold better and had a bigger community. That is huge; why are they going to jump to Sony when the online infrastructure they enjoy is in place and now there is no DRM?
 
brick-lol.gif
 
That's what I've been seeing a lot of since yesterday. I'm personally of the belief that the PS4's current software lineup is pretty pathetic, and that without the DRM advantage all they have going for them is the price. That being said, I still (and always will) absolutely despise Microsoft as a company, so I'm stuck with PS4 by default.

I was just really hoping this gen would be an open and shut case so we could be done with this moneyhat bullshit for good. These "I can bribe more publishers than you!" spite fights don't benefit anybody.

Bud... i think you should wait for TGS and Gamescom lol
 
Holiday 2014 will tell the story. The hardcore gamer will sell out both consoles for a while. If MS can getting going in Japan they are in good position.



I highly doubt that is going to happen, especially since PS4 will most likely offer most of the same games, more powerful specifications and will be cheaper.
 
I think they've still lost a good chunk of the early adopter set ( read us) with the price point and backlash over policies.

Hardcore is hardcore though and anyone expecting to get both at launch probably will do so. Long term it's anyone's rodeo but for me it comes down to price, 1st part exclusives, and streaming to Vita
 
I don't think it will sell more units anywhere. The rumors are pretty consistent that there are simply more PS4's being made for launch.

I do know one thing - the big winner in an xbox 180 shortage is gonna be the scalpers. Demand went up sharply yesterday with the reversal.
 
MS has Ryse the QTE fest, there was hardly anything to get excited about on the gameplay side... Yay, new shooters.

90 % of the games are the same, they're multi and the best version will be on PS4.

A less powerful machine with a less valuable online subscription at a 100$ higher price point ? Count me in !
 
Wii U has a year long head start and no supply constraints, what planet are you living on?


It's not selling too well now, why would it start selling well when the PS4 and XBox One materialize unless they significantly drop the price and release some high profile games on it at that time.
 
Not a chance worldwide, but a possibility for NA. I'm flipping back and forth on the implications of $399 vs $499. On one hand, in this market the $399 should really help drive sales. Another line of thinking suggests that people are fools and always believe a more expensive piece of hardware is better and justifies the purchase.
 
COD, BF4 have exclusive content for the Xbox One, plus the 360 versions of COD and BF sold better and had a bigger community. That is huge; why are they going to jump to Sony when the online infrastructure they enjoy is in place and now there is no DRM?

Because it's $100 cheaper, and no amount of timed exclusive DLC will make up for that.

The Wii and PS2 were the successes they were because they had perceived value, and the same was true of the 360 for a long time when it was measured against the PS3.

I genuinely believe a lot if people are seriously underestimating just how much of an advantage the $100 difference is.
 
The planet where Wii U isn't selling at all besides having a head start and doesn't look like it'll change anytime soon?

It's not selling too well now, why would it start selling well when the PS4 and XBox One materialize unless they significantly drop the price and release some high profile games on it at that time.

I guess you missed the fact that the Wii U has a 3.5 million lead already and that the XBO is going to have supply constraints. But lets ignore that becase "lol Nintendo" right? Xbox 360 sold ~5 million units in its first six months, and that was without DRM backlash, always on Kinect or a $500 price point. Even if MS matched last gens initial output, do you really think Nintendo isn't going to sell more than 1.5 million Wii U's in a year?
 
Fair enough. I guess we just look for different things in games then.

Well, I owned a PSX, Dreamcast and PS2 but while I owned them all I did most of my gaming on PC. When 360 came out, for various reasons (like going away to uni and having less time money and patience for PC gaming) I swapped to doing most of my gaming on consoles.

So I don't really look at the PS2 as a 'golden age' (full disclosure, I also do not enjoy Japanese games very much).

This gen has seen a lot of incorrigible bullshit. Because no one console curbstomped. the Console Warz have been generally horrible. The fact that multiplatforms have been virtually identical gave us pixel counting and all that kind of miserable horseshit. I ended up buying two consoles, so over the same length it has cost me slightly more
 
COD, BF4 have exclusive content for the Xbox One, plus the 360 versions of COD and BF sold better and had a bigger community. That is huge; why are they going to jump to Sony when the online infrastructure they enjoy is in place and now there is no DRM?
how much more does those games sell on 360 compared to ps3? i always saw the online numbers being similar, and big enough to not really matter which has more.
 
If PS4 and 360 go toe-to-toe in the US in the first year, that's good progress for Sony, as it was 2:1 last gen. I don't believe that Microsoft could lose that advantage too easily - they were already catching up on Sony in the US before the 360 came out, and Sony was already much more dominating in Europe by the end of the last-gen lifecycle. The trend for both of these positions carried over into next gen, helped by Sony's pricing problems and Xbox online service domination (no doubt helped by giving Gold accounts to the press for free).

The price difference is going to help Sony a lot in Europe, but on the other hand, if Kinect turns out really good, and works in small livingrooms, then that could be a big plus in Europe as well (who seem more receptive to such things).
 
With or without DRM, historically whenever console maker tried to make it more than a game machine, the reaction was bad. I think that aspect of XBone is as much trouble for MS as the DRM debacle.
 
Not a chance worldwide, but a possibility for NA. I'm flipping back and forth on the implications of $399 vs $499. On one hand, in this market the $399 should really help drive sales. Another line of thinking suggests that people are fools and always believe a more expensive piece of hardware is better and justifies the purchase.

This post just made me look up Kinect sales thinking they were only around the 8m mark and fuck me, I didn't realise it had sold 24m units. Leads me to believe that maybe a lot of the more casual, family oriented market might actually see the additional Kinect 2 worth the extra $100.
 
If PS4 and 360 go toe-to-toe in the US in the first year, that's good progress for Sony, as it was 2:1 last gen. I don't believe that Microsoft could lose that advantage too easily - they were already catching up on Sony in the US before the 360 came out, and Sony was already much more dominating in Europe by the end of the last-gen lifecycle. The trend for both of these positions carried over into next gen, helped by Sony's pricing problems and Xbox online service domination (no doubt helped by giving Gold accounts to the press for free).

The price difference is going to help Sony a lot in Europe, but on the other hand, if Kinect turns out really good, and works in small livingrooms, then that could be a big plus in Europe as well (who seem more receptive to such things).

Not in any dimension was the OG Xbox closing in on PS2. Like anywhere
 
There now exists the possibility that the XBone can go toe to toe with the PS4.

But without further drastic changes, it continues to be an improbable outcome.
 
As far as I know, MS isn't launching in Japan. That alone should give an edge in gobal sales to Sony.

Then I'm pretty sure that PS4 will dominate in Europe. Maybe he's talking about US sales in which he may be right.
 
As far as I know, MS isn't launching in Japan. That alone should give an edge in gobal sales to Sony.

Then I'm pretty sure that PS4 will dominate in Europe. Maybe he's talking about US sales in which he may be right.

Adding to that however they are attending TGS
 
PS4 will definitely sell more individual units this holiday if the yield issues are correct, but after that it's anyone's game. Nothing's going to change from this gen. And if things stay the same as they were this gen, Microsoft wins. Sony can't survive another generation-long battle of attrition like this against Microsoft's vastly larger cash reserves - they basically had to capture a commanding, overwhelming lead from minute one or Microsoft will just brute force their way to success like they always do.

Microsoft was cheaper and had the earlier install base advantage. Sony will have that this time...so I'm not seeing where Microsoft just randomly catches up despite being behind on supply and price.
 
COD, BF4 have exclusive content for the Xbox One, plus the 360 versions of COD and BF sold better and had a bigger community. That is huge; why are they going to jump to Sony when the online infrastructure they enjoy is in place and now there is no DRM?


Wow, Microsoft ponied up for exclusive content! Do we know what it is yet? Is it exclusive missions,? multiplayer maps? or exclusive skins?
 
360 sold roughly as much as the PS3 in Europe.

He said main land EU and he is right. The UK carried the 360 in Europe. This time around that is not going to happen. The thing is pretty much the price of the PS3 in the UK. MS is going to get trounced in Europe this time around. Even worse many over there are pissed that a lot of the reason for the high price TV stuff won't even work for them.

Best case for MS they eek out a win in the US but lose in the rest of the world 3 to 1. Getting rid of the DRM was great but the thing still is way over priced outside the US. If they want to price cut to same level as PS4 they would have a fighting chance.
 
Well, I owned a PSX, Dreamcast and PS2 but while I owned them all I did most of my gaming on PC. When 360 came out, for various reasons (like going away to uni and having less time money and patience for PC gaming) I swapped to doing most of my gaming on consoles.

So I don't really look at the PS2 as a 'golden age' (full disclosure, I also do not enjoy Japanese games very much).

This gen has seen a lot of incorrigible bullshit. Because no one console curbstomped. the Console Warz have been generally horrible. The fact that multiplatforms have been virtually identical gave us pixel counting and all that kind of miserable horseshit. I ended up buying two consoles, so over the same length it has cost me slightly more

This is pretty much exactly why I hate this gen so much. The industry is split so many ways that nobody can focus on just making good games anymore - they have to focus on appealing to so many different demographics and userbases that every game just feels the same.

When I say a "resurgence of the PS2 gen", I mean a generation where there's one leading console that everyone develops for, not necessarily just a console infested with Japanese games (though I would love it if consoles DID have more JP games, to be honest). Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like if we had a clear winner, some of the anti-consumer bullshit (moneyhats, timed exclusives, exclusive DLC, lowest-common-denominator multiplatform development) that has infested this generation so horribly would be a little less prominent.

Bud... i think you should wait for TGS and Gamescom lol

I'm not holding my breath. A bunch of new IP announcements probably won't do much for me after a game with a title as interesting as The Order: 1886 ended up being a shooter.
 
360 sold roughly as much as the PS3 in Europe.

It had a 14 month head start and a £150 price difference and it beat the PS3 in one market, incidentally the one with closest ties to the US.

If the PS4 isn't the best selling console across Europe with a lower price then Sony are really going to have done something incredibly bad. It would be pathetic.
 
COD, BF4 have exclusive content for the Xbox One, plus the 360 versions of COD and BF sold better and had a bigger community. That is huge; why are they going to jump to Sony when the online infrastructure they enjoy is in place and now there is no DRM?

Well guess who will have bigger COD and BF communities to start this generation? It won't be MS because of major supply issues. By the time it is fixed those games will be old news or anyone who wanted to play them will have done them else where.
 
MS has Ryse the QTE fest, there was hardly anything to get excited about on the gameplay side... Yay, new shooters.

90 % of the games are the same, they're multi and the best version will be on PS4.

A less powerful machine with a less valuable online subscription at a 100$ higher price point ? Count me in !

The Xbox One is going to be a major bottleneck for the PS4 so I wouldn't expect many games to look drastically better on the PS4.

Plus, isn't the version with the most content the "best version"?
 
The Xbox One is going to be a major bottleneck for the PS4 so I wouldn't expect many games to look drastically better on the PS4.

Plus, isn't the version with the most content the "best version"?
They have essentially the same CPU, the GPU advantage isn't a bottleneck at all. It's only capable of basically the same games looking better anyway.
 
MS has Ryse the QTE fest, there was hardly anything to get excited about on the gameplay side... Yay, new shooters.

90 % of the games are the same, they're multi and the best version will be on PS4.

A less powerful machine with a less valuable online subscription at a 100$ higher price point ? Count me in !

THIS!
People are only looking at the quantity. Exclusives dont mean anything when they are filled with kinect games and ryse.
 
THIS!
People are only looking at the quantity. Exclusives dont mean anything when they are filled with kinect games and ryse.

neither have exclusives that interest me massively though kz is a bit of a bore so xb probably beats it. The strongest stuff all looks stuff I can get on pc though so I've decided to get neither and wait a year, see what happens.
 
WHAT?? The Order is not a shooter. It's 3rd person action adventure

Which means "shooter, with occasional non-shooting elements". And the Order teaser definitely made it look co-op focused as well, which means I'm even less interested than I would've been if it was SP-only. This isn't the thread to talk about that though.
 
"We are confident that with six months of focused messaging"



Ok, this comment bothers me. When are they going to start their focused messaging? Think of everything they have talked about up to this point, that has all changed. Their focus has changed, what they have tried to convince us about, has changed.



When they revealed the Xbox One, they had to defend the TV, TV, TV, but nothing like they had to defend their DRM and Used Game Schemes. Then, they finally released their official DRM and Used Game Policies at E3, and had to defend them like crazy. Think of all the time since the Xbox Reveal and during E3, that they had to use to convince us why we needed an always online console, why we shouldn't be able to trade our games, why Family Sharing is going to be so awesome.


Then they had to further explain Family Sharing, how it works, they spent days on that. Now, here we are, a week later, and all of the original messages are wadded up in the trash can.


Everything they have tried to convince us we needed, Online System, Non Consumer DRM, Family Sharing, has been changed and tossed out. All the time they have had to communicate with us, persuade us to buy an Xbox One, was spent on all these other policies and features that no longer exist.


I have zero confidence in Microsoft getting a focused message out, not with them scrambling the way they appear to be. Changing things in reaction to Sony (Now Xbox Live has 2 free games a month, almost exactly like PS+, now Xbox One has the same DRM and Used Game policies as PS4) is taking up way too much of their time.


Microsoft has missed so much time to sell the Xbox One. They were spending their man hours on features and restrictions that they changed under pressure. I don't believe they have a main focus anymore and their lack of focus is going to kill them, in my opinion , during launch.
 
COD, BF4 have exclusive content for the Xbox One, plus the 360 versions of COD and BF sold better and had a bigger community. That is huge; why are they going to jump to Sony when the online infrastructure they enjoy is in place and now there is no DRM?

Exclusive content for BF4 isn't huge. Any of it that isn't a timed exclusive will also be a throw away. I don't know the CoD fanbase, can't speak for that. I do know the BF fanbase. :P

I think the one-eighty has a good chance for parity in the US, now. Brand loyalty alone should manage that in spite of the price/power difference. I don't see it doing near as well in the rest of the world, where their brand isn't near as strong.
 
COD, BF4 have exclusive content for the Xbox One, plus the 360 versions of COD and BF sold better and had a bigger community. That is huge; why are they going to jump to Sony when the online infrastructure they enjoy is in place and now there is no DRM?

Sony has exclusive content for Ubisoft games as well. Also I don#t think it matters. here in Germany PS3 versions of both those games outsell the 360 one. Most people don#t give a shit about timed exclusive DLC.

PS: The BF4 deal ist just the first DLC pack for some time first on Xbone. So it's nothing like the COD deal.
 
Top Bottom