• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Pachter thinks Xbox One will now sell as many units as PS4

they weren't buying $500 consoles. If xbox one does poorly through 2014, the mainstream will ignore it when it gets to their pricepoint.

I wouldn't say this. Exclusive major games will help.

A lower priced SKU with say less hard drive space alongside the launch of Halo 5 would get a lot of attention I think.
 
they weren't buying $500 consoles. If xbox one does poorly through 2014, the mainstream will ignore it when it gets to their pricepoint.

The 4gb 360/kinect bundle is currently 300. The 250gb bundle is currently 400. Not sure of the current sales breakdown but the Xbox one bundle at 500 seems like a steal compared to those.
 
Money, money, and more money

Microsoft has a deal with Activision wherein they pay for Call of Duty's massive advertising budget in exchange for 30-day DLC. It has nothing to do with a 2 million sales difference.

I get the money part, but it definitely seems that COD is played more by 360 gamers than PS3 according to sales numbers,etc.
 
I think there are enough "fanboys" on each side that this is probably true.

By the way, if any GIF makers want to take this idea and run...

The idea:
Take the scene from The Dark Knight Rises when the bat signal shows up in fire on the Brooklyn Bridge. Replace Batman's face with that guy from Xbox as he walks out of the shadows. Replace the fire/symbol on the bridge with the Xbox 180 logo. When Bane says "Impossible" replace his face with someone from Sony.
 
I can see the Xbox One's momentum building up between now and launch in the US. I don't think it will sell ad much as the PS4 though. That $100 difference is a game changer.
Not really, not if the customer sees the value in it.

All of you talking about $100 price differences meaning anything should look back on the Gamecube.
 
Patcher must be wrong. I men launch aligned the PS3 (terrible awful start and all) outsold the Xbox 360 WW. Now they're launch aligned for real and the PS4 is 100 dollars less expensive with moderately better hardware and their first party is only getting stronger (4 mainstream impact teams between Naughty Dog and Santa Monica with Sucker Punch really starting to shine). The price difference alone will ensure that Microsoft's advantages in the US and UK are blunted, and it will stop Microsoft from making any significant headway (if any)in traditional Sony strongholds in the rest of Europe.

This

Kinect sold for 150 yet sold a lot and pushed Microsoft further into the lead in America. I think many people will feel the $100 is justifiable for a better kinect. If I recall, the more expensive 360/kinect bundles sold quite well.

Ehhh that was during the Kinect hype phase that has seemingly died off, as there are few games that support the thing.
 
Ehhh that was during the Kinect hype phase that has seemingly died off, as there are few games that support the thing.
You don't think Microsoft's shiny new TV integration and multitasking OS nonsense is going to get that same hype? If the new Kinect is as functional as the demos show, you don't think that will cause some word-of-mouth buzz?
$100 more weaker and without the First party studios Sony has.
Okay, this is really starting to sound like the Gamecube defense.
 
It'll make a difference in Microsoft's main territories, it already has in the UK.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Best-Seller...m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_r=112QWW8F8BFR9JMBZKK0

Before the DRM policies change, XO games were nearly non existent in this list. Now they're prominent.

Worldwide? PS4 will dominate the XO.

Those Amazon best-sellers are for the past x units of time only. A better picture can be obtained by looking at the 2013 year:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/bestsellers/2013/videogames/ref=zg_bs_tab_t_bsar
 
It doesn't seem like Microsoft is even making as many Xbox One units as PS4 units for launch. Could they possibly delay the EU launch by a month or so to allocate their units to the US? Not like it would really matter in Europe to them.
 
Why is that sad? Do you really find it so inconceivable that people could be interested in a DRM-less Xbone that you think it's 'sad' that now that the DRM is gone people are willing to buy it?

Yeah, I think it's pretty weak, at the least. Giddily jumping back on ship because Microsoft decided to whisper sweet nothings in your ear is terribly reactionary and emotional, in my opinion. Their intent was clear, and they only changed because they felt like they had to, and I wouldn't be surprised if they start changing things back to the way they were originally planned bit by bit if the Xbone becomes successful.

It's as "sad" as it would be if people had jumped (despite their loathing of the DRM stuff) because MS announced a game that they liked at E3. "Well, I hate what they're trying to do to me as a gamer, but oh man, I just love me some Halo!"
 
Ehhh that was during the Kinect hype phase that has seemingly died off, as there are few games that support the thing.

Microsoft is including kinect for a reason and I agree with them. The best way to ensure developers create games with kinect in mind is by including it with every system. I think you'll see basically every game support it in some fashion.

Also I don't think the hype is dead, not when this one is supposedly a giant improvement that delivers on the promises of the original.
 
Kinect is barely 3 years old. 24 mil people aren't just going to fork down $500. But going by their ridiculous new 360 slim pricing. They feel like they have gamers by the balls and they would buy the system at any price. Which is true for the most part.
 
Like previously mentioned, he must mean US which I can definitely see. WW Sony will eat up a lot of what MS gained in Europe, dominate asia again. That combined with regained market share in US will probably result in a comfortable but not dominant sales lead.
 
Yeah, I think it's pretty weak, at the least. Giddily jumping back on ship because Microsoft decided to whisper sweet nothings in your ear is terribly reactionary and emotional, in my opinion. Their intent was clear, and they only changed because they felt like they had to, and I wouldn't be surprised if they start changing things back to the way they were originally planned bit by bit if the Xbone becomes successful.

It's as "sad" as it would be if people had jumped (despite their loathing of the DRM stuff) because MS announced a game that they liked at E3. "Well, I hate what they're trying to do to me as a gamer, but oh man, I just love me some Halo!"


I would say pathetic and sad.


And I'm sure many of these same people were the ones that absolutely refused to believe all the Always Online/no used games "rumors" before the Xbone reveal. And then proceeded to do mental gymnastics to somehow justify this out right attack on their rights as a consumer.


But hey! Now everything is all right! but they can't understand why people aren't so eager to run back into Microsoft's loving embrace.
 
Worldwide Microsoft is going to be beaten hard.
PS3 won with so many handicaps it's ridiculous, PS4 not only won't have those but it's actually going to have many advantages.
UK will probably be reconquered by Sony as well.
In the US, I expect them to be close, Microsoft definetly won't lead them by 14m units. The gap will be less than 5m in the long run, whoever comes on top.
Also there's this issue of yields and manufacturing capacity pending on Microsoft's head which could have a strong impact on launch figures if MS can't fix the situation in time.
 
I keep hearing this, but it's the cost of less than two new games, spread out over 6-7 years. Do people really not think things through more than that?

I have a PS4 preordered with no plans to get an Xbone, but I really don't see $100 at launch as a major factor in the long run. That could easily be made up by a subsidized SKU or any other number of factors.

That $100 was a pretty big factor with the PS3 and 360.
 
So long as all platforms sell well, everyone benefits in the end.

I do not understand why everyone does not come to this conclusion

Any one platform taking dominance in a generation is horrible for the consumer

PSN/PS+ is where it is because of competition from LIVE
XB1 is no longer using online DRM because of the the PS4
Kinect/Move was born because of the Wii
.
.
.
 
Why? The hardcore who played strictly 360 for sports/COD/BF will be right in line for it, especially now. The extra 100 is for the Kinect, which some obviously don't want, but it is cheaper than buying the first Kinect.

All indications right now are that PS4 will have more units available.
 
I keep hearing this, but it's the cost of less than two new games, spread out over 6-7 years. Do people really not think things through more than that?

I have a PS4 preordered with no plans to get an Xbone, but I really don't see $100 at launch as a major factor in the long run. That could easily be made up by a subsidized SKU or any other number of factors.
A bugatti only costs two dollars per hour for ten years. Easy as pie, right? You can stretch anything out like that, yet it doesn't make it anymore viable for everyone because they need to drop those $500 + tax that very moment.
 
It will. The PS3 sold fairly well during the first year despite a high price and worse 3rd party support. The US and UK will continue to carry Microsoft's platforms to the clouds.

It sold to the die hard fans how do you think ms got the lead it has here, it was down to price. Price is king in the uk and £429 is too much it will sell to die hards but after that it will be an all out war with sony having a box way cheaper.
 
Top Bottom