I don’t know if Starfield is expensive to make but being made by 400 people doesn’t automatically make it expensive or cheap. You also have to account how long it took them to develop the game of which I don’t know the answer to.How is Starfield, a game made by roughly 400 people, now a "super-expensive AAAA" game?
yep, totally the same!!
I think it's been 7 years now, but for the first 3-4 years there was only a small team working it. Starfield isn't a particularly expensive game. Standard AAA basically.I don’t know if Starfield is expensive to make but being made by 400 people doesn’t automatically make it expensive or cheap. You also have to account how long it took them to develop the game of which I don’t know the answer to.
People where hyping this up to be the second coming, game of the generation material. It may very well end up being those things, but from what alot of people saw can't blame them for being really dissapointed.We have more than a year of these articles to look forward to.
It takes courage to tell truth.
Congrats, PC Gamer.
Christ, that is the most obnoxious popcorn meme gif I have ever seen.PlayStation fanboys right now ...
Easy GOTY 2023 unless Zelda knocks it out of the park.People where hyping this up to be the second coming, game of the generation material. It may very well end up being those things, but from what alot of people saw can't blame them for being really dissapointed.
i agree, i also think starfield will be one of the best games ever but.....I will be that guy but...
NMS has turned into a wonderful game after a rocky start so (for me) if they are roughly the same I will be happy
Plus I don't think Starfield was ugly as in my mind at least most of these other world would probably look like what Starfield envisioned and not the brightly colored palette that NMS uses
Just me though
PC gamer are fanboys? This game will release day one on pc.
This doesn’t add up.
Reality check:Works both ways imo.
Seems people are overhyping and jerking to starfield because it's an Xbox exclusive.
After fallout 4 and 76 and jank that comes with their garbage engine people know what to expect from Bethesda, yet all of a sudden starfield is the second coming. I wonder why?
Uh-huhPC Gamer is just farming clicks. The coping is happening somewhere else.
Yeah, PC GAMER of all places, where the game will also be on.i wonder how different the reception would be if it wasn't xbox exclusive plenty of people enjoyed Skyrim/Fallout 4 but now fuck Bethesda apparently lol
i bet when this launches Bethesda will be hounded for bugs/performance issues. usually they get a pass but Starfield will be compared to Cyberpunk. mark my words.
I don't think sony fans are thinking that much about starfield.
To me it's just a continuation of it, maybe not hype but certainly over exposure. I've had very realistic expectations for this game because Bethesda burned all of it's good will with me more than a decade ago.People where hyping this up to be the second coming, game of the generation material. It may very well end up being those things, but from what alot of people saw can't blame them for being really dissapointed.
Yeah I have little faith the game comes out polished and just fantastic to play right away because of who is making iti agree, i also think starfield will be one of the best games ever but.....
It is going to take years and years to reach its full potential, it will be the pc modder community that will make this game great.
By the time the 10th year anniversary edition comes out, i would imagine this game will be absolutely pinnacle of space exploration/rpg games.
Until then, well
Am I saying any lies here? Is PC Gamer a Sony fanboy site?Aren't you the person who keeps whinging about concern in every other Sony thread?
I had no idea PC gamer was in Sony's back pocket. This is a big story.Yeah, PC GAMER of all places, where the game will also be on.
You staying on topic but calling people fanboys. The one person you called a fanboy is a ps gamer! GtfoThe same way you constantly go to ps threads to troll ps games.
At least I’m not bashing the game but Bethesda for making a bad reveal. Stay on topic and Stop derailing the thread.
I played Fallout 4 on launch, the experience was not great.Reality check:
- Fallout 4 launched at 88 MC (84 on PS4);
- It shipped 12M copies in 24 hours and beat the concurrent players record of GTA5 with 470k concurrents;
- It sits on Steam at 88% positive recent reviews and 81% lifetime.
A big open world game is always going to have bugs, deal with it or play linear games.
76 is the only game with poor reception and as of now it’s actually quite good (on PC).
Uhh xbox console exclusive. EVERY Xbox game is on pc. They're not on PlayStation though, which is what triggered Swift_StarUm this is a PC game - and the comments came from PC gamer….
It delivered quite well, in my opinion. No doubt it'll be a game that defines Xbox for some time once its released. Some flaws? Sure. But the demo was incredible.I think this is a really poor take, the presentation of the said reveal was pretty mediocre at best. There are some genuine concerns about the game and a lot of it is coming from even PC users.
There is a reason the game has been delayed.
This game is/has been hyped to the heavens by some people on this forum, if you're going to put said game on a pedestal, it needs to deliver.
Because it's fun!Why are you comparing Starfield with Fortnite ?
The demo was "incredible".. Who are you Colteastwood/dealer gaming or something?It delivered quite well, in my opinion. No doubt it'll be a game that defines Xbox for some time once its released. Some flaws? Sure. But the demo was incredible.
They didn't say they were delaying because they thought the game didnt look good. If that were the case, they wouldnt have shown the demo. They delayed because they dont want another Cyberpunk incident and won't take a chance of that happening with SF. Trying to frame the delay due to Bethesda thinking their game doesn't deliver is BS.
But it was a good showing. Great showing! And it still has at least a year of polish to go. And Halo won numerous Game of the Year awards after years of being shitted on. If SF was at least multiplatform, the response would be much, much different. Thats my only point. It is what it is......but it wasn't a good showing....
That's the point some of you are dismissing. It reminds me of Halo Infinite's first game play showing.
Which was also a game ppl hyped up to hell n back...before any actual gameplay was shown...
Am I saying any lies here? Is PC Gamer a Sony fanboy site?
Now stop trolling and derailing the thread.
The reception really wasn’t good, huh? There are too many articles trying to turn the tide around this game. Wow.
you must be fun at parties. I don’t understand your point, though, you don’t care about this game, why the concern?
Like I said, it was a bad showing, but the game might come out good and will be heavily modded which seems to be one of the biggest advantages of these games.Yeah I have little faith the game comes out polished and just fantastic to play right away because of who is making it
But I have hopes it has massive potential
Oh I can't wait to play this on PC with modsLike I said, it was a bad showing, but the game might come out good and will be heavily modded which seems to be one of the biggest advantages of these games.
People surely love to mod Bethesda games.
They really need to make a new reveal and get it right this time.
Do you honestly think you convince anyone with this shit talk?Am I saying any lies here? Is PC Gamer a Sony fanboy site?
Now stop trolling and derailing the thread.
These people are trying to derail the discussion, just ignore them, it’s not worth it.Ps fans getting the blame for a shitty pcgamer article
It is what it is. PC GAMER wrote this, not Sony fans.Do you honestly think you convince anyone with this shit talk?
Your opinion is simply that. Yours. I give zero fucks what you thought of it. No offense. It doesnt affect mine. Changes nothing. I dont have "expectations". Lol. Its a video game. A luxury. My standards are raised where it matters most.The demo was "incredible".. Who are you Colteastwood/dealer gaming or something?
It was miles from incredible.
I gave it a 7 and it was lucky to get that,
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but jeez dude raise your expectations abit.
PC or console? Matter of perspective of course but I find it way better than Fallout 3 for example. Even without mods and once you factor in the mods it’s almost underrated.I played Fallout 4 on launch, the experience was not great.
I even finished a playthrough about 3 months ago, i love the fallout experience but 88%, there is no way that game deserves that.
i cant wait for some pc modder to make a thunder fighter as a ship.Oh I can't wait to play this on PC with mods
Honestly this far out the showing didn't bother me on this scale of a game as to me it showed its potential
And totally not cherry picked.yep, totally the same!!
ps4 i am afraid.PC or console? Matter of perspective of course but I find it way better than Fallout 3 for example. Even without mods and once you factor in the mods it’s almost underrated.
I was just pointing out the dishonesty of painting Bethesda as a jank studio when that really only applies to FO76 (a game which should simply have been delayed a year or so like Starfield is now).
Well since both of them are procedural liers , it's not surprise both games look like clones
Being 55 now I always "loved" Colonel Deering as welli cant wait for some pc modder to make a thunder fighter as a ship.
Always loved Colonel Deering, probably too old for most users to remember on this thread.
Grandad molyneux?Well since both of them are procedural liers , it's not surprise both games look like clones