shacklesmcgee
Member
You mean, two?
There was only two? I had assumed more, as otherwise good lord that is a very small sample size to claim a problem and make a big deal out of
You mean, two?
I'm confused, am I understanding right that the general sentiment here is that sony should NOT be offering refunds? The fuck? Why not? Because it's digital media? If I buy something, accidently or otherwise, and never use the product, I should be allowed to return it hassle-free within a timely manner, the stories in the OP sound like they were going for the refund same day or the next morning. Fuck that noise from sony, I love them but the anti-consumer bullshit is still messed up.
I'm also confused how multiple people turned their ps4 on, left it on, used the DS4 on their ps3 to play dark souls2, all accidentally bought something and all were refused a refund....I'm calling shenanigans
So Sony is refusing to reimburse people who are intentionally using one of their products for something other than its intended use, and somehow Sony is doing something wrong? Sure.
I'm also confused how multiple people turned their ps4 on, left it on, used the DS4 on their ps3 to play dark souls2, all accidentally bought something and all were refused a refund....I'm calling shenanigans
There was a guy in the titanfall thread who played the game, then got a refund from EA for the reason: Its not fun enough, with screenshots as proof.
There was only two? I had assumed more, as otherwise good lord that is a very small sample size to claim a problem and make a big deal out of
One. The second guy in the OP still had to call customer service.You mean, two?
yeah there will always be outliers but if it was a widespread problem EA would have shut it down. They probably get more sales from people buying the game to "test" then keeping it anyway, than refunds.
The only thing I think needs to happen is that password input is an Opt-Out, instead of an Opt-In. Then again, I bet we would eventually come up with one or two people that go, I accidentally typed in my full password and bought a game... I'm serious.Which is perfectly fine. However this is beyond a Sony issue and needs to be taken up to a higher place. If situations like this can arise, there needs to be extra precautions put in place so that the consumer can have a way around it. If that means companies need to always specifically label what and what their products can and cannot do than so be it. It's ridiculous to be called some type of fanboy for not seeing the situation in tinted glasses.
Does he mean it as a noun or an adjective? I admit, "couple" would be a better usage of words, but he's not wrong, in using "multiple".You mean, two?
Screen shots? Like picture quality or negative KDR?
The only thing I think needs to happen is that password input is an Opt-Out, instead of an Opt-In. Then again, I bet we would eventually come up with one or two people that go, I accidentally typed in my full password and bought a game... I'm serious.
Download something from the PS store, and while you wait play some Dark Souls 2. Doesn't seem like a farfetched situation to me.
The DS4 is compatible with the PS4, bluetooth devices, and devices that accept generic USB input. So people that use it with the PS3 are using it as intended.
And as a consumer I would like to see Sony implement a variety of features and policies that their competitors in the digital space have already enacted that protect against these sort of situations.
They should get a refund. Anti consumer GAF is something I never expected to see, there's always one or two, but this thread is mind blowing.
Sony should offer a refund, since the customer had no intention of buying the game. It's an officially supported feature that's implemented in a crappy way.
Also, fix this crap Sony, it's not that hard.
They should get a refund. Anti consumer GAF is something I never expected to see, there's always one or two, but this thread is mind blowing.
Sony should offer a refund, since the customer had no intention of buying the game. It's an officially supported feature that's implemented in a crappy way.
Also, fix this crap Sony, it's not that hard.
So do you want them to take out the DS4 controller support out of the PS3, or do you want them to take out the charge on any USB port out of the DS4 controller?Also, fix this crap Sony, it's not that hard.
Thanks for not reading the thread. This is not anti-consumer bullshit. Its also not an officially supported feature. Officially recognised as possible, maybe. But not officially supported.
By much less frequent you mean...once?But it's nice of you to grant a point of mine, one which would make this situation much less frequent and less of a hassle for everyone involved.
In the case of them buying things and it's not even close to Sony's fault? Sorry I don't see this as some consumers rights issue, more like consumer ignorance.It would be in Sony's best interests to make these customers happy.
The thread has shown that they do allow refunds for a variety of reasons, including reasons has versatile as the game was ugly and accidentally clicking twice on a subscription. Aside from that, the PlayStation 4 starts downloads automatically.It''s anti-consumer to not allow refunds at all, especially in the content hasn't been downloaded. Sony deserves far more shit than it gets for it's policies.
Read the OP, couldn't help but laugh. Yeah, I don't see Sony offering refunds for this. Especially since they have offer a confirmation screen twice I think asking if you are sure if you want to buy the product. Sucks, but just eat it and move on. This isn't anti-consumer or any other word being thrown around. More like lesson learned.
Read the topic, we have listed our reasons thousands of times.Why are people saying that the DS4 isn't officially supported on the PS3?
For its general policies regarding refunds, definitely. For this problem in particular, probably not imho. If something isn't officially supported (though I guess an argument can be made - still seems tenuous), you're taking some risk in using it.It''s anti-consumer to not allow refunds at all, especially in the content hasn't been downloaded. Sony deserves far more shit than it gets for it's policies.
Yes, and now they're going to take it away because now it's costing them money.Why are people saying that the DS4 isn't officially supported on the PS3?
There's an official support article informing user how to use the DS4 with the PS3...
By much less frequent you mean...once?
You can't connect your DS4 to your PS3 with bluetooth afaik. Its a generic controller in the eyes of the PS3.
Thanks for not reading the thread. This is not anti-consumer bullshit. Its also not an officially supported feature. Officially recognised as possible, maybe. But not officially supported.
I've received more than one refund from Sony on digital content that I chose to buy. So I can't give them shit when they helped me out in a timely manner. I am sure they would refund these things but I can't put blame on Sony either for all this.It''s anti-consumer to not allow refunds at all, especially in the content hasn't been downloaded. Sony deserves far more shit than it gets for it's policies.
For its general policies regarding refunds, definitely. For this problem in particular, probably not imho. If something isn't officially supported (though I guess an argument can be made - still seems tenuous), you're taking some risk in using it.
This is bullshit. You have to verify each PSN purchase twice before it goes though. Its completely the OP and Sony has no blame in this at all.
Anti-consumer my ass.
I read the first two (4) pages, if it is recognized (not maybe, it's recognized, fact), it's supported, and fixing it shouldn't be hard at all.You can't connect your DS4 to your PS3 with bluetooth afaik. Its a generic controller in the eyes of the PS3.
Thanks for not reading the thread. This is not anti-consumer bullshit. Its also not an officially supported feature. Officially recognised as possible, maybe. But not officially supported.
Because it's something so randomly idiotic that it actually took this long for someone to try it.Excuse me if it has been covered.. But why is this happening now? Couldn't this have happened since November?
I read the first two (4) pages, if it is recognized (not maybe, it's recognized, fact), it's supported, and fixing it shouldn't be hard at all. .
.So do you want them to take out the DS4 controller support out of the PS3, or do you want them to take out the charge on any USB port out of the DS4 controller?
You mean you have to hit X twice without moving the cursor at all? Calm it down buddy.
This incident makes me realize multiboxing is now possible with a console game.
No. I mean like there is literally a section where they ask you why you are asking for a refund, and there is a drop down menu with the option 'Its not fun enough' that you can select.
Not surprised to see people defending Sonys awful policy on refunds on PSN.
Why are people saying that the DS4 isn't officially supported on the PS3?
There's an official support article informing user how to use the DS4 with the PS3...
It is possible to connect a DualShock 4 controller to a PlayStation®3 using a USB cable. It cannot be synced to a PS4 via Bluetooth. Only basic functionality is supported and not all games are compatible.