I don't have fulltime job, but my brother and friends have. Also, i have gym and class during the day... So it's basically the same.Gigglepoo said:You're really stubborn. I'm going to out on a limb and guess that you do not have a fulltime job. Am I correct? So tell me, when you're playing Zelda or Paper Mario, are you completely alone?
felipeko said:I don't have fulltime job, but my brother and friends have. Also, i have gym and class during the day... So it's basically the same.
And i don't play Zelda or Paper Mario... The only 2 single players im interested so far are Z&W and SMG, both are simple and people can play together...
HocusPocus said:Let me know when Sony does because they aren't even in the same ballpark yet.
Before surpassing something, you have to at least try to match it, but still, at least Sony has not given up.Kyoufu said:Nintendo isn't trying to match it. Sony is trying to surpass it.
Sorry for that :/Gigglepoo said:So you don't play online multiplayer games, you don't play single player games and you don't own an X360. I would feel like I've wasted so much time, but then again I do post while working.
felipeko said:Sorry for that :/
But in my defense... you don't play much local multiplayer either ;D
Mamesj said:The power of the internet vs. the power of a couple gyros and an accelerometer?
Remember: the Wiimote could easily be ripped off and used on other systems. Then Nintendo would be back to square one with relying on 1st party franchises to keep the system afloat. There's no reason why any system can't have both.
I hope that sounds objective enough-- not trying to start a flame war.
KiticanaX said:I mean a full single player experience. I'm talking about small developers who want to make full games focused on single players game instead of a budget pick up and play game. Basically a game that has enough depth that's worth $40 or $50.
thefro said:![]()
As I always say to anyone who really thinks XBox Live is super-innovative (the only innovation is the standardization).
Not that XBand was the first system, but it's pretty similar to Live.
I think thats the whole freaking point. A unified red that supports all games, so that you are always online and able to interact with friends. Similar motion sensing devices appeared before the Wii, but the whole point of Nintendo's console is that motion sensing controls are standard so that all developers can use them. They both were done before, however no company had ever pushed such features to the point of making them standard.thefro said:![]()
As I always say to anyone who really thinks XBox Live is super-innovative (the only innovation is the standardization).
Not that XBand was the first system, but it's pretty similar to Live.
thefro said:As I always say to anyone who really thinks XBox Live is super-innovative (the only innovation is the standardization).
Not that XBand was the first system, but it's pretty similar to Live.
Core407 said:The Wii's impact on the market is beyond anyones understanding. I think the fact that Sony and MS will be implementing some kind of similar controls into future consoles is further proof of that.
Edit: Let me rephrase. The poster I quoted said that the Wii was a bigger impact because it will probably make Sony and MS implement motion controls in their next consoles. I simply was stating that Live made Nintendo and Sony both create their own online networks, making his argument self-defeating.angelfly said:Nintendo had an online service for downloading original games, maps for games, etc long before Live if your trying to use the "what came first" logic.
MC Safety said:In all fairness, Peter Molyneux could say he wanted a beer with this grilled cheese sandwich and people would rush to the message boards to slam him for it.
MMaRsu said:
Amir0x said:I agree.
Now you know I cant say much. Yes we are working on another title at the moments and it is more of a casual game. Once we start to talk about it you will see some Project Dimitri elements!
thefro said:Not that XBand was the first system, but it's pretty similar to Live.
WHOAguitarninja said:It's not about proving to be a hallmark of the industry...it's about influencing the development of it. Sony has responded with PSN, even Nintendo is online now. Every console developer has certainly taken notice of what MS has done and are trying to come up with something to atleast compare to it. This is what he's talking about. It is still WAY too early to tell what longterm effects the Wii-mote will have on how consoles go forward in the future. Like I said it may become the defacto standard method of control, then you would have an argument for it, but it's simply too early to tell right now.
DeaconKnowledge said:Sony has been online with the PS2 for years and it as a system has proved to be far more popular than XBOX Live.
Fixed2BeBroken said:IT ALL STARTED WITH SEGA....
MEGADRIVE
NEVER FORGET
So when he said that "Without any doubt the biggest revolution we will see in games will be to do with what the player holds and how they control a game", was he lying, or temporarily insane? Or is he only an authority on the creative merit of non-traditional controls when it suits your argument?drohne said:molyneux is a game designer, not an analyst. the creative impact of the wiimote is virtually nil. if michael pachter downplays the significance of the wiimote, feel free to protest -- you have grounds. if peter molyneux isn't bowled over by the creative possibilities of twiddling your arm instead of pressing a button, concede the point and move on.
drohne said:molyneux is a game designer, not an analyst. the creative impact of the wiimote is virtually nil. if michael pachter downplays the significance of the wiimote, feel free to protest -- you have grounds. if peter molyneux isn't bowled over by the creative possibilities of twiddling your arm instead of pressing a button, concede the point and move on.
Just concede the point and move on.drohne said:DAMAGE CONTROL
drohne said:b. if he does still believe that a controller will be the next revolution in games, it doesn't necessarily follow that the wiimote is that controller
All I can say is that Microsoft is an incredibly smart company and I never fail to be impressed by just how clever they are.
That was probably before he had the Wii devkit.Branduil said:So when he said that "Without any doubt the biggest revolution we will see in games will be to do with what the player holds and how they control a game", was he lying, or temporarily insane? Or is he only an authority on the creative merit of non-traditional controls when it suits your argument?
traveler said:Do you really think we'd have something like Home on the way if Xbox Live had never come around?
Why the hell would he have a Wii devkit?Jacobi said:That was probably before he had the Wii devkit.
BTW Project Dimitri is a virtual-life-game, it's supposed to simulate your past and present