QuantumBro
Banned
Lol, maybe you guys shouldn't have raised the price if you were looking to spur growth.
They did increase the number of sub... that's not what this arti...you know what? Never mind.Lol, maybe you guys shouldn't have raised the price if you were looking to spur growth.
Here, found the full thing where they are basing this. Its from Kaz Hirai speech for investors in the latest Sony Corporate Strategy Meeting
Lol, maybe you guys shouldn't have raised the price if you were looking to spur growth.
Haha what a non-article. Extrapolating one innocuous statement into a slew of baseless speculation and half-baked theorising.
Says the same thing four times. Classic wordcount pad.
EDIT: Just seen that this has just passed 1000 upvotes on /r/PS4 as well. Express rolling around in that ad-revenue.
How about this: Add all PS1 & PS2 classics to PlayStation Now.
PS+ will be worth $60 at that point.
How about PlayStation Plus offers all of their 1st party games past/present/future for FREE.
Same, finally let my subscription expire earlier this month for the first time. Games haven't appealed to me for a while, only take advantage of the sales once in a great while, and I hardly do multiplayer.I'll keep my eyes open for this then because I let mine expire and have no plans to come back.
Sony make the multiplayer free .. once again ... and u'll win e3 ..
To make it even more appealing.
They just need to make it appealing again for a lot of people. This is a service I used to want to subscribe to because of the games it offered. Now I subscribe to it because I have to if I want to play online. The appeal is gone for the most part. Far worse content, with a pretty substantial price increase. Yeah, that's appealing.
Sony make the multiplayer free .. once again ... and u'll win e3 ..
To make it even more appealing.
They just need to make it appealing again for a lot of people. This is a service I used to want to subscribe to because of the games it offered. Now I subscribe to it because I have to if I want to play online. The appeal is gone for the most part. Far worse content, with a pretty substantial price increase. Yeah, that's appealing.
There is no way Knack doesn't come to PS+ between now and the Knack 2 launch.
Starting July PS+ will be the following :
3 PS4 games
2 PS Vita games
PS Now subscription included (making PS3 games playable in PS4)
Can i only hope....
Knack incoming
Starting July PS+ will be the following :
3 PS4 games
2 PS Vita games
PS Now subscription included (making PS3 games playable in PS4)
Can i only hope....
I remember similar being said about Gravity Rush Remastered before Gravity Rush 2 and that never happened.
You mean that thing they're charging $100 annually for? And they would include that as part of their $60 PS+ program? Oh. Yeah. Plausible.
The statement is very vague, but taking something out of PS Plus seems contrary to what's being suggested.I'm worried that if they add PSVR games they might decide drop the Vita games.
You mean that thing they're charging $100 annually for? And they would include that as part of their $60 PS+ program? Oh. Yeah. Plausible.
'No. You picked a stupid name when you were young, now live with it.'Just give me a username change please
Stomping? Newish indie games vs old backwards compatible aaa games? Depends on taste. I agree backwards compatibility has given ms an unique advantage. They can get away by giving mediocre Xbox one games but big name aaa x360 gamesMicrosoft has been stomping sony's plus offerings with games with gold, though the backward compatibility is
A big help. In order to match this sony should offer two free ps now games as well as the standard plus games
Here, found the full thing where they are basing this. Its from Kaz Hirai speech for investors in the latest Sony Corporate Strategy Meeting
Here, found the full thing where they are basing this. Its from Kaz Hirai speech for investors in the latest Sony Corporate Strategy Meeting