Yesyesyes.gifeh I tried.
Yesyesyes.gifeh I tried.
How the fuck a game news website goes from this gem - Street Fighter 2: An oral history to this shit only the person behind running Polygon knows.
And it is not a coincidence. I refuse to believe that the current state of Polygon including sensationalist articles such as
Playing with privilege: the invisible benefits of gaming while male are not intentionally driven to the extend of purposly creating an agenda through propaganda. This shit is disgusting and uncalled it. It is not funny anymore. Any Polygon contributer with any human dignity left should explain to us what the fuck is going on.
And that includes the recent trend of amateur reviews that revolve around the argument(s) of "too much swearing" and other immature, unprofessional breakdowns. That is not normal and I refuse to believe that the journalists behind it do not recognize the shortfallings in those practices. And like others have stated the ratio of good articles are one to three with occasionally one to four and one to five. They can hide all day long behind the "opinion" argument and try to defend mediocre representations of various argumenet through their comment sections; which for the past month has been mainly questionable and negative, but that will eventually run out. Same thing applies to this article as well.
Fact is their quality has been dropping down for a while and they are aware of it. It is not a drop-of-quality that you can go on it right now and see it for your self - it usually comes in small doses with big headlines that beg for controversy - not even asking for it. I am getting increasingly suspicious.
How the fuck a game news website goes from this gem - Street Fighter 2: An oral history to this shit only the person behind running Polygon knows.
I think it's just an effect of running a site with a paid staff. You have to run clickbait articles (or links) alongside legitimate content. Everybody loves GiantBomb, but even there if you scroll down on any story there's still a bunch of clickbait articles "From Around The Web". Polygon just generates their clickbait in house, rather than linking to BuzzFeed lists.
I dunno.. I've been in the press for a looooong time.
During the halcyon days of old, we had people at Game Players actively disparaging handhelds, we had an ESRB that was negligent at best, there was a lot of "system wars" terribleness mixed into the pages and letters. Companies encourage this kind of eye rolling bad though. A quick check of the recent keynote at WWDC shows a lot of "system wars" rhetoric still alive and well. We all used to quote NPD TRSTS stats like they were gospel, a 40 in Famitsu meant a game was beyond criticism, and we got a lot of our foreign news from sites like The Magic Box.. which was on GEOCITIES for crying out loud. >_<
But the media was a lot more close knit back then. I remember bitter arguments with Bill from Game Players over where the market was heading. I said that the Game Boy was going to get a second wind and be huge once Pocket Monsters came out in the USA and that we'd be playing games on our phones in less than a decade. Somewhere, he owes me a soda. Hell, even up into the 2000 era.. it was pretty bad. GameCube was announced and the first thing that Adam Sessler asks Peter Main about it is "How will it compete with the XBOX?" and then follows it up with a question where he proceeds to get the name of the system wrong multiple times. Also, there were people complaining about the lack of 1080p console games back in 2000. Yeah. It doesn't really change too much. Of course, I'm not above that at all. I've made my share of "PoS2" remarks and so forth. I think my favorite terrible move was when I got dragged onto the stage at Nokia's booth to say something nice about the N*Gage. My reply was "It's an interesting phone and mobile games are the future. Maybe not in this shape, but I would certainly say that it's a nice companion system for your Game Boy Color. Mobile games are an emerging market. You're looking at the future. It still needs a little bit of work, but that's why we need to support it."
Yeah. I'm kind of awful. :-/
That isn't the point though....Considering how terrible the Wii U has been selling I don't see how anyone can really jump on them for assuming the Wii U version of MK8 might sell the worse. Shit they were wrong but many of you would be lying your asses off if you were to say would be shocked it did not sell as well as others.
Considering how terrible the Wii U has been selling I don't see how anyone can really jump on them for assuming the Wii U version of MK8 might sell the worse. Shit they were wrong but many of you would be lying your asses off if you were to say would be shocked it did not sell as well as others.
Giant Bomb isn't actively paying people to produce shit articles. Not remotely the same thing.I think it's just an effect of running a site with a paid staff. You have to run clickbait articles (or links) alongside legitimate content. Everybody loves GiantBomb, but even there if you scroll down on any story there's still a bunch of clickbait articles "From Around The Web". Polygon just generates their clickbait in house, rather than linking to BuzzFeed lists.
Considering how terrible the Wii U has been selling I don't see how anyone can really jump on them for assuming the Wii U version of MK8 might sell the worse. Shit they were wrong but many of you would be lying your asses off if you were to say would be shocked it did not sell as well as others.
Considering how terrible the Wii U has been selling I don't see how anyone can really jump on them for assuming the Wii U version of MK8 might sell the worse. Shit they were wrong but many of you would be lying your asses off if you were to say would be shocked it did not sell as well as others.
...so you would have rather they pretended they never put the chart up in the first place? If anything, I have even more respect for them for keeping it up even after being shown they were wrong.
I hope not. They're legitimately one of my favorite sites. I really do fail to see what GAF sees in them. Their long form articles are fantastic, their reviews are really well done, etc. I like them much, much more than Giantbomb and other sites y'all seem to like.
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
Ben Kuchera, what do you expect.
Good job, Ben. You managed to successfully demonstrate a game on 5 platforms sold more than a game on one. I never would have understood that without your ability to articulate it in such a way. Now I am smarter. Yay.I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
It gets a bit more facepalm worthy. An editor of NintendoLife called him out on Twitter about it and he decided to state that he's not arguing with someone who edits a console-specific website.
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
He'll be the prime motivation for banning polygon.com from these forums.Who's this Ben Kuchera?And why should we care???
For the best.
It gets a bit more facepalm worthy. An editor of NintendoLife called him out on Twitter about it and he decided to state that he's not arguing with someone who edits a console-specific website.
Haha wow. "Please comment on the article so we can control and delete your thoughts if we need."
https://twitter.com/DamienMcFerran/status/474241139558858753
Considering how terrible the Wii U has been selling I don't see how anyone can really jump on them for assuming the Wii U version of MK8 might sell the worse. Shit they were wrong but many of you would be lying your asses off if you were to say would be shocked it did not sell as well as others.
I don't think the actual premise ("MK8 will be most likely be the lowest selling in the series") was ever considered controversial or the main absurdity in the article. It was that they used some incredibly suspect and slapdash attempts at projecting lifetime sales for MK8, attempting to blindly slap the average attach rate onto the Wii U without considering what affects attach rate, and producing some laughable graphs like the infamous pie chart in an attempt to look "scientific." Hence, MK8 selling roughly the same amount in a single weekend as Polygon's expert analysis assumed it would sell in nearly a year.
Well, that and "Wii U game will probably sell the worst in the series" isn't that interesting of a premise for an article, all things considered.
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
Haha wow. "Please comment on the article so we can control and delete your thoughts if we need."
https://twitter.com/DamienMcFerran/status/474241139558858753
Ok this is just a disgustingly terrible article.I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/4/5777124/Nintendo-Sony-Microsoft-Mario-cross-platform-dreams
Why are they all so hateful towards their readership? If these people had real jobs there's no way they'd be allowed to act like that. Oh wait I think I just answered my own question.
OUROBOROS!
Is it wrong to ask for bullet points or a summary so I don't give a potentially bad article on another site clicks/views?
Is it wrong to ask for bullet points or a summary so I don't give a potentially bad article on another site clicks/views?
I'm not making a thread for this but it's bad. So so bad.
Ok this is just a disgustingly terrible article.