If the project runs out of money, none of you guys get to complain, okay?
I wonder if Polygon are going to announce how much advertising revenue they make from people clicking on that story which was created because Sony are helping Ys Net fund Sega's game?
Hopefully they'll present it as a pie chart to keep it simple.
So do people find it as big of a problem as others do?
Personally, i'd love more transparency as well.
We were told the 2 million was used to see if there was interest in the project. Sony said they would help fund it. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
The irony in being called Polygon but only having one angle.
People expect much greater transparency from Kickstarter titles, because those people have already taken consumers' money and are expectecd to be responsible with it.
Though, they are very two-dimensionalThe irony in being called Polygon but only having one angle.
Assuming that it would cost $47 mil today because that's what it cost in 1999 is pretty flawed thinking.
Shots firedI would say that both Yu Suzuki and SCE have been far more transparent about the budget of Shenmue III than Polygon is about their own.
Dunno how old or if it been mentioned before, but here:
So do people find it as big of a problem as others do?
Personally, i'd love more transparency as well.
polygon - where potato salad is more important than video gamesWait, he defended that shitty potato salad KS, but is concerned about this one?
Fucking gold.
It's clear the fans are behind the project, and Sony is happy to bring the final product to the PlayStation 4 upon completion; the company is even contributing to the development of the game.
Which is part of my problem with this project: The fans are being asked to "fund" the game, but we have no clue what the actual budget of the game will be, nor where the funds will ultimately come from.
The irony in being called Polygon but only having one angle.
I'm kind of getting tired of this,
Why wasn't there concern about Bloodstained and the mystery company they had to prove demand to ?
Well, it usually seems that the people so worried about a KS game budget are invariably people who don't like KS and haven't put any money on the line at all.
So they're freaking out over a problem that only they perceive and that doesn't directly impact them in the least.
It's a weird "I'm protecting you for your own good from this vague thing I dislike... Mainly because people aren't giving me money like that. I don't get why you think I'm being annoying."
I'm kind of getting tired of this,
Why wasn't there concern about Bloodstained and the mystery company they had to prove demand to ?
I mean if dualshockers was blacklisted why not polygon.
The only time I hear about their bs is on GAF.
Temporary fix while Polygon isn't banned:
Hide Forum Threads - A Tampermonkey script for hiding unwanted GAF threads
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=944860
Keyword to add: "Polygon"
I discovered this today
ShitThe irony in being called Polygon but only having one angle.
This shouldn't be a thread.
That is a trash article from polygon.
The irony in being called Polygon but only having one angle.
If the project runs out of money, none of you guys get to complain, okay?
Thanks.Good point. We need to know this business information.
"Polygon's clickbait advertising revenue is a mystery, and why that's a problem."
Polygon are operating in desperation mode. Their announcement of layoffs last year as well as a complete abandonment of their features-driven editorial philosophy (ie: the great hope the entire fucking site was founded upon) came on the same day that the WSJ revealed PewDiePie just made $4 million dollars last year.
The vidya game news aggregator sites have seen their audience dwindle year-over-year for the past few years, and instead of trying to make pivots towards the new reality, which is that streamers and social media have made them practically obsolete, theyve leaned heavily into manufacturing controversy for the most core, jaded readers in order to try and stop the bleeding. In the case of Kotaku and Polygon, many of their patented news with added snark articles are directly sourced from whatever is the most popular outrage topic on Gaf on any given day.
Like I mentioned before, it really must eat people like Kuchera alive that while gamergaters disgust him, they actually make up a large part of the dwindling core audience they have to increasingly cater to. There is financial incentive for Kuchera to basically repost outrage threads and drum up controversy (real or imagined) using the age-old "Devs and pubs are trying to screw you! We're your public advocate, average gamer!" narratives. That's what their easily-outraged audience wants; enemies, and the idea that there are things happening in secret that are going to destroy gaming, easy pariahs that they can all rally against. That's why they've pushed the "preorders are bad for the industry" slant for the past couple of years, because waiting for metacritic and/or the big traditional press reviews of a game is one of the last real arrows in their quiver. They want to make it seem like they're some kind of video game consumer watchdogs, but really it all comes back to their almighty god, the pageview.
Wait, what? If a Kickstarter doesn't deliver on what they claimed they would, yes it's a problem, and people would have the right to complain. But that would be a reaction when that situation comes up. If there's an editorial heavily implying that will likely happen, with no better evidence than the company didn't give them a detailed breakdown of the behind-the-scenes funding, then that's way out of line. This isn't some either-or thing.
People will look for anything to complain about.
Polygon is looking for clicks.
Can we ban Polygon threads? That would be great. I hate giving their click bait articles clicks.