-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
PS3 at Chinajoy Expo
- Thread starter GeoramA
- Start date
davepoobond
you can't put a price on sparks
Speevy said:
which would be something like Insomniac Games -- They'd still be considered second party. There's two forms of second parties the way i look at it, the Insomniac Games "exclusive to one console" company (contract or not) or the one or two exclusive game second party which can/might make games for other consoles/companies at the time -- something like Level 5.
so is there any actual (new) info from this thing or nothing?
Speevy said:
MS might not have ownership of SK, but do you see SK making games for the PS3 in the foreseeable future? Because I sure don't, unless MS drops them like a rock. For a developer like Ninja Theory, Insomniac (a developer which has been with Sony for two generations now) and Factor 5, lots of resources were devoted to making a proprietary engine for the PS3 with the intention of pursuing games in the same franchise using the technology developed in-house, it's doubtful they will make a game for any other console, and Sony treats their second-party developers VERY WELL (so much so both Guerilla Games and Zipper Interactive are now happy to be SCEWW subsidiaries), and that's in addition to Ninja Theory having a very close relationship to SCEE Cambridge which some of the founders were from originally, they were JAM when they started their company and were dropped by MS after Kung Fu Chaos, now they're back with Sony.
The Abominable Snowman
Member
Did acousticvan steal over $300 worth in *** ***'s Saturn games?Chiggs said:
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
ELS-01X said:
That seems doable.
Especially considering that, they already shown us the real-time models at GDC.
Real-time wireframe dragon model
Real-time dragon model from his left side
Real-time dragon model from his right side
Doom_Bringer
Banned
kaching said:
The game was early/unfinished. I am just saying how everything has been improved and honestly the Playsatation meeting models were terrible! Too shiny, too plasticy..
With lightning, at GDC exactly the same effect occurs. Hell just from that picture you can see the back of the bottom dragon doesn't look shiny. Its grasping at straws.ELS-01X said:
Oh and theres no way that scene in your .gif is real-time. Watching the 720p trailer and seeing a couple hundred dragons flapping away with astounding detail in the front one especially and the most beautiful lighting gives a different impression than a tiny compressed movie
The GDC demo is from the same trailer, duh. Someone should look at trailer before talking nonsense.Striek said:
Did I claim it was real time? No.Oh and theres no way that scene in your .gif is real-time. Watching the 720p trailer and seeing a couple hundred dragons flapping away with astounding detail in the front one especially and the most beautiful lighting gives a different impression than a tiny compressed movie
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Striek said:With lightning, at GDC exactly the same effect occurs. Hell just from that picture you can see the back of the bottom dragon doesn't look shiny. Its grasping at straws.
Oh and theres no way that scene in your .gif is real-time. Watching the 720p trailer and seeing a couple hundred dragons flapping away with astounding detail in the front one especially and the most beautiful lighting gives a different impression than a tiny compressed movie
The dragon model was real-time see...
You do realise I was not only agreeing with you, I was also giving a further reason why it looks plasticy in that shot? Damned so defensive over nothing.ELS-01X said:
And no, I was talking about the part at GDC where the two dragons have a camera being rotated around whilst in attack, not the trailer from PS Meeting 05.
...calm down sparky. Did I claim you claimed it was realtime? No. Sheesh :lolELS-01X said:
@mckmas, I know it was realtime at GDC, I'm saying in conjunction with everything else going on in that trailer I find it hard to believe (that and the unwillingness of the developers to clarify, because I really doubt Sony wouldn't want that out there).
Doom_Bringer
Banned
Factor 5 sucks, Lair is CG! Don't believe1!!
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Notice that they added some AF.
http://www.gfdata.de/archiv07-2006-gamefront/1981.html for linkGhaleonEB said:I noticed you added a bunch of red x's.
Doom_Bringer
Banned
inthezone said:
Yeah the designers said that Warhawk is a modified World War II era plane. In my opinion it doesnt fit in on one hand you have these massive air battleships that are floating in the sky with futuristic radar equipment and whatnot and on the other hand you have this shitty looking WWII airplane with rocket boosters. What were they thinking? :lol
Totally batshit insane
lunlunqq said:
man... I really can't wait to have that in my entertainment center... I really like the looks of it... I wish they'd release it in White as well...
that white with the chrome strip on it! bling! Oh well, can't win them all...Warhawks water is gorgeous though, and I don't mind the style of fighter in it... I don't see what's so wrong with it... has a primitive WWII style with simplistic 70's (aka PhantomII and a rugged look that reminds me of a A-10)... I like it...
I think it would look better without the silver trim around the CD slot, have just the silver streak down the side. Then, of course, lose the Spider-man font and put "PS3" on the side in the same font as the "PS2" on the side of the PS2 - only in silver as well instead of the blue on PS2. That would be the new hotness.
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
The spiderman font RULEZ!!111one111
Bud said:
It depends, doing the PS3 in the font that it's done on PS2 would accentuate the height (when it's vertical) of the unit rather than accentuate the width of it, which I think tends to make one see it as "stunted" and more pudgy. If it accentuated the height it would at least make the unit have a consistent vertical orientation in the design when it is standing vertically, rather than having this long horizontal component printed arcross the front when it's standing vertically.