down 2 orth
Member
Jebus, I thought Microsoft wanted us to come together in one big loving cross-play family? I'm confused by their motives now.
Jebus, I thought Microsoft wanted us to come together in one big loving cross-play family? I'm confused by their motives now.
Jebus, I thought Microsoft wanted us to come together in one big loving cross-play family? I'm confused by their motives now.
That is entirely untrue. All the reporting is that Sony (at least partially) funded SFV from the beginning -- they did not hop in with $$$ at the last minute to lock down the platforms. Even a Capcom producer said they weren't going to invest in SFV -- before Sony hopped in.
MS has a team helping them with the port? Bluehole is racking in the money, they don't need MS's help. They could buy an entire porting company if they wanted at this point.
"hey can we develop a port of your game for our platform"
"sure"
Such evil intent
See capcom and sf. Or some indies , MS paying for the port, when the team is 100% focusec on getting the pc version out.Bluehole has already made millions off PUBG. I'm pretty sure they could afford to hire as many people as needed to start porting the game without outside financial/technical help.
More like 'can we cockblock our competitor's customers'?
Gotcha. It doesn't sound like the Xbox porting process is very hard, or that Microsoft needs to put that many resources into it. Mr. Greene says the Anticto team that was tasked to help do the job is pretty much three people.After E3
http://gamingbolt.com/playerunknown...e-game-wont-compromise-pc-version-due-to-xbox
Also, I keep writing Anticto wrong.
Where do you get that from?
Bluehole is barely managing to keep the PC version on track.
They don't have the time or resources to develop the game for a platform they've never touched. But hey whatever fits your narrative.
Well for one, there are. As somebody has already pointed out to you in this thread.
Its going to be a yr exclusive, you guy know it, its not confusing, they had a 4 man/women porting it to xbox, now, supposedly a Xbox team is porting it. It'll be a good port. Its a great get for MS
Is there a thread devoted to just the exclusivity of crash collection? How many pages is it?
Except there are no threads about how the 'exclusivity' of the crash collection is confusing, and that's even more so than this. So yeah, he has a point.
You know there is a search feature right?
Any way, here are some:
Speculation: Crash Bandicoot N-Sane Trilogy is 1yr Console Exclusive (PS4) - 473 replies
UI artist of Crash Bandicoot Trilogy posts video with Xbox prompts - mildshock.gif - 411 replies
[Rumor] Crash Bandicoot N.Sane Trilogy releasing December 8th on XB1? - 316 replies
crash bandicoot trilogy pretty much confirmed on pc ? - 260 replies
Hey, I agree.
Those threads aren't made of the premise of Sony and their Crash exclusivity being confusing, so you're wrong. I MADE one of those threads. The premise of them are for new news, new thread, and X retailer or Y website shows Xbox version or some other. And that in fact proves his point; so much back and forth and backtracking mixed with silence and this and that, so many threads, yet there are no threads made with the premise of calling out Sony and their bullshit regarding it. Instead these very threads are filled with posters saying it should be exclusive because Crash is synonymous with PlayStation, that people are port begging just because they know it isn't going to be exclusive and want to know when it will be available for them, and defending Sony saying they shouldn't have to talk about the nature of their timed deal because of business reasons (but in this thread, the exact, very opposite, especially from you).
Those threads aren't made of the premise of Sony and their Crash exclusivity being confusing, so you're wrong. I MADE one of those threads. The premise of them are for new news, new thread, and X retailer or Y website shows Xbox version or some other. And that in fact proves his point; so much back and forth and backtracking mixed with silence and this and that, so many threads, yet there are no threads made with the premise of calling out Sony and their bullshit regarding it. Instead these very threads are filled with posters saying it should be exclusive because Crash is synonymous with PlayStation, that people are port begging just because they know it isn't going to be exclusive and want to know when it will be available for them, and defending Sony saying they shouldn't have to talk about the nature of their timed deal because of business reasons (but in this thread, the exact, very opposite, especially from you).
I thought Philly wasnt a fan of these types of deals? lol
More like 'can we cockblock our competitor's customers'?
wow, for somebody who's pretty much always whining about Sony 'fanboys' and tag-teaming in with that Jeff Freecs character, you sure are the fucking worst kind of fanboy, seeing bias everywhere when you're as bad as The Last Word.
Only thing I'll say is this.
Didn't Phil specifically say he didn't want to do deals like this after the whole TR situation?
I dont know what deals get written. Ive been pretty open about, Im not a fan of doing deals that hold back specific pieces of content from other platforms. You dont see that in the deals weve done with Assassins and Shadow. Well have a marketing deal on those, but I dont say, hey, I need some kind of Strike or skin somebody else cant play.
Only thing I'll say is this.
Didn't Phil specifically say he didn't want to do deals like this after the whole TR situation?
More like 'can we cockblock our competitor's customers'?
Only thing I'll say is this.
Didn't Phil specifically say he didn't want to do deals like this after the whole TR situation?
Obscure!
Xbox.com said:Coming to Xbox One as a console launch exclusive in Xbox Game Preview later this year.
From the other thread.
Doesn't sound liked the situation as changed at all from E3, outside of MS stepping in to speed it along.
Are you fucking kidding me? I directly responded to you hours ago!
Notice how none of those thread titles are upset about Sony not being forthright about it? They're just reporting basically the latest bits discovered, but there is no thread of outrage calling Sony to task for being so confusing or misleading like there is whenever it goes the other way.
Which can only be a good thing.
Sorry, I guess I missed your first post.
Notice how none of those thread titles are upset about Sony not being forthright about it? They're just reporting basically the latest bits discovered, but there is no thread of outrage calling Sony to task for being so confusing or misleading like there is whenever it goes the other way.
Its not me who's putting the spin out there. I mean, you're the one who brought up Bluehole and their lack of resources. Lmao, you say it like their game hasn't been a huge financial success.
Just admit it, Microsoft is cockblocking.
Yep, be fantastic if they haven't slapped on any extra exclusivity, which they'd have every right to. MS would deserve major props even.
More like 'can we cockblock our competitor's customers'?