Inspectah_Deck
Member
I think the difference is quite huge.
Any way to measure framerate in UWP other than presentmon?
Is it confirmed that MSAA x4 is still on when rendering native?
I think the difference is quite huge.
What's the performance like now? Can I get 60fps yet on a 970 on high/ultra?
Does disabling upscaling also disable the auto 4xMSAA?
Is it confirmed that MSAA x4 is still on when rendering native?
no one has reported any perf improvement on nvidia gpus, still runs quite poorly
Unbelievable. I have more than double the hard drive space needed for the update and yet Windows Store tells me that it can't be downloaded and I need to free space....
Just tried it post-patch (GTX 980, 16Gb RAM, SSD) and the wholelevel stutters like CRAZY! I've got almost everything on medium except textures and geometry, and when I'm outside at the start I get 55-60fps, but once I get inside and downstairs I have huge framerate variation depending on where I'm looking (45-60) and 2- to 3-second freezes at regular intervals.swimming pool
I'm feeling like the game's even less playable now that pre-patch.
THat's a shame. I want to buy it but only if I can get 60fps on at least X1 settings. Don't want to buy it if I can't then a month down the line have a patch come out allowing that and missing out on better gameplay.
Heh, on my laptop (Windows 10 PRO) it tells me I need Windows 10 to download the game, option to buy is greyed out.
THat's a shame. I want to buy it but only if I can get 60fps on at least X1 settings. Don't want to buy it if I can't then a month down the line have a patch come out allowing that and missing out on better gameplay.
Heh, on my laptop (Windows 10 PRO) it tells me I need Windows 10 to download the game, option to buy is greyed out.
I can get 60fps most of the time with default medium settings with my 780ti, which is basically X1 settings.
I guess you could adjust come stuff and still get good performance since you have a newish card.
Amd card performance?
That wouldn't be too bad. Anyone know if it supports PS4 controllers through DS4Windows? I know normal games would, not sure on UWA though.
Alot of people saying in the other thread that this game heavily favours amd, but no exact setting or fps which is basically useless to me.Yeah, what gives? Most performance comparisons I've seen given in this thread were for nvidia cards. AMD just released 16.4.2 drivers too with new Crossfire settings, so dunno if there might be some performance improvement there.
I made a screenshot comparison of reproduction on and off:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/171252
(screens by dr_rus and Zywy)
The difference in sharpness is negligible, even though it's there. What an endless disaster.
Nope.I can't see much of a difference honestly - and I'm a stickler for native res. Am I crazy?
What's the performance like now? Can I get 60fps yet on a 970 on high/ultra?
I'm done with it for now. i7 3770K, 16GB RAM, Titan X
I was running it at 1080p, even with upscaling on - turned Global Illumination and Volumetric Lighting to high and it still stutters after a bit. I think this will have to be one game I just play on console until some of this gets sorted. It's nice to have an unlocked framerate, but in and out of cutscenes it just dips all over the place- I don't think it's my rig, I could be wrong. I also don't have it installed on an SSD, post patch it certainly is better but it needs a lot of work.
What is Ultra SR for then? I mean if you can't play it at 1080p who can??
What is Ultra SR for then? I mean if you can't play it at 1080p who can??
The word does not end in 2016. It might be too much for now, but hardware never stagnates.
What? This is so wrong.
While I certainly would not use QB as an example for this since it has major issues that are not even related to this aspect: future proofing.^ I think that SLI doesn't work? Or it works but it does almost nothing. That's what i read somewhere. But i might be wrong.
What? This is so wrong.
What is wrong with giving games settings that will make them look good on future hardware?
I can't tell you how much I wish I could increase Assassin's Creed II's draw distance...
What? This is so wrong.
What? This is so wrong.
They recommended 980 or ti if i am not wrong for Ultra. And clearly it doesn't work well even with that GPU. Not on Ultra but even if you lower some settings, you can't get stable 60fps and stutter free experience. You don't see anything wrong here?
We are not talking about game that uses all the hardware as it should. We are talking about bad, Xbox One port. Ppl need to realise the difference between these two.
How many of you guys went through Crysis as (high end) PC gamers? Haha, I remember that...good times.
We are not talking about game that uses all the hardware as it should. We are talking about bad, Xbox One port. Ppl need to realise the difference between these two.
What is wrong with giving games settings that will make them look good on future hardware?
I can't tell you how much I wish I could increase Assassin's Creed II's draw distance...