Two things:
The Cell isn't a standard CPU. Really, there are barely any CPUs that match it's peak computational performance even today. It's peak performance is rated at 230 GFLOPs. The most powerful Core i7 is rated at 65 GFLOPs. As you might imagine, it's just not comparable to normal CPUs. It's a totally different beast.
The other consoles aren't going to be 10x as powerful as Wii U. That's just crazy. There will barely be an Xbox vs. 360 difference between current consoles and the other next-gen systems.
The online bit is nice to hear.
The 3DS online is getting really, really good. I'm sure this time Nintendo will bring it when it comes to online functionality. If they don't, then well...they haven't learnt anything. But that won't be the case.
You're probably right about that. I wonder how Batman: Arkham City will do since it will be a year old game by the time it's ported to Wii U. There's gonna be a lot of ports this year for Wii U and so how do third-parties expect to deal with that when they've got to compete against Nintendo's own titles in addition to a potential Black Ops 2 port as well. A lot of these games are going to be fighting for sales scraps.
I was just explaining how it can be weaker and also more powerful.
On the second point, that is not crazy. I don't see how you can say that is not possible given it s happen every single time with ms and Sony. I don't know how you can show 10x or whatever. I think it will be a huge jump and you sure won't see threads were people are happy that the next Gen version looks a little better than ps360 version. Like it some big deal....
I was just explaining how it can be weaker and also more powerful.
On the second point, that is not crazy. I don't see how you can say that is not possible given it s happen every single time with ms and Sony. I don't know how you can show 10x or whatever. I think it will be a huge jump and you sure won't see threads were people are happy that the next Gen version looks a little better than ps360 version. Like it some big deal....
The only thing missing for me from Nintendo's online(my standards aren't off the charts with online) is voicechat.
I'm saying that there won't be a generational gap between Wii U and PS4/720.
The only thing missing for me from Nintendo's online(my standards aren't off the charts with online) is voicechat.
Well, that's just diminishing returns. Textures and poly counts have reached a point where it's hard to make that many jaw-dropping improvements. Since lighting has been steadily improving, and modern PCs can push pretty high resolutions with basic AA, there are fewer and fewer basic things to improve on. A lot of resources will go into more subtle things like tessellation, ambient occlusion, more advanced light/shadow effects, various blurs and filters.
Oh you still think the wiiu is a jump not Xbox 360+?
Oh you still think the wiiu is a jump not Xbox 360+?
[u] 360 PS3 Wii U XB3/PS4[/u]
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
The CoD headsets work quite well. It's just that Nintendo doesn't support it themselves.
My PC looks way better than my PS3. Very easy to tell and these are built based on the console. They are really holding back PC. Bf3 is like night and day. Plus the console barely can run online maps, they are tiny...
These console can't even run these games in HD. Diminishing returns lol
No. It's more like somewhere in-between. 2-3x current-gen in terms of raw specs, with modern (DX11-class) effects. It'll be a lot weaker than the PS4/720, but not another Wii. Like Wii U vs PS4/720 will be similar toDreamcastPS2 vs XBox/Wii.
Does anyone here think Nintendo should also offer a premium online service? If so, what could you see "Super NiN" having, and do you think it would be a good venture for them?
Oh, so online is prevalent for the Wii through third parties(whatever third party support there is)???
And will Nintendo ever support it???
I mean, what about just make it useable between friends???
fixed
I'd be down with it, but not for $60 a year. The only reason I pay for XBL at all is because I fucking love Halo. $30 a year at most.Does anyone here think Nintendo should also offer a premium online service? If so, what could you see "Super NiN" having, and do you think it would be a good venture for them?
Does anyone here think Nintendo should also offer a premium online service? If so, what could you see "Super NiN" having, and do you think it would be a good venture for them?
Does anyone here think Nintendo should also offer a premium online service? If so, what could you see "Super NiN" having, and do you think it would be a good venture for them?
We'll see. I'm still skeptical.
To compete in the online space, all they need to do is this:
1. Have an OS that's freely patchable and update friendly, to future-proof the console throughout the generation.
2. Have multiple profiles available on each console. Each one must be linked to a Club Nintendo account along with any content, NOT tied to the console itself.
3. Allow title updates and patches for games.
4. Have a natural evolution of the eShop, with access to DLC, demos for every game and patches.
5. Voice chat and a decent friend list system.
That's it for the ESSENTIAL stuff. Now, the other stuff which would also be nice:
6. Gamecube/VC downloads from launch. A method to transfer your content from your Wii to the Wii-U (a transfer system seems unlikely though...)
7. Hulu/Netflix available at launch in the USA. Netflix/Lovefilm/BBC iplayer/ITV player etc available from launch in the UK. Very likely, and will help cement it's place in the living room for any audience.
8. Decent music/video capabilities. Fine, it can't play Blu Ray or DVD - but what's stopping it from playing MP3/MP4/DIVX? Not online related, but yeah.
Anyone disagree with me on these points?
No. It's more like somewhere in-between. 2-3x current-gen in terms of raw specs, with modern (DX11-class) effects. It'll be a lot weaker than the PS4/720, but not another Wii. Like Wii U vs PS4/720 will be similar to Dreamcast vs XBox/Wii.
Xbox 360 + is from 2 different insiders in the wiiu thread. You are setting yourself up for a huge let down.
Wiiu gpu is dx10.1
Can people stop posting this like it means something? I think we all know the Wii U will be superior to the PS3/360. That's not what anyone is concerned or arguing about.- It's a very powerful system. More so than 360/PS3.
From Edge's preview it sounds like they're taking the Aliens approach of action>horror, where the xenomorths are only threatening in packs. Unfortunately.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=37978475&highlight=indeed#post37978475
Got your edit in just in time.
Xbox 360 + is from 2 different insiders in the wiiu thread. You are setting yourself up for a huge let down.
Wiiu gpu is dx10.1
Wii U early dev kit GPU is DX10.1 equivalent first off. Second the GPU wasn't completed till late Dec./Early Jan. Third you have to understand the context of why Ideaman said "Xbox 360+", while antonz, whom I'm assuming is the other you are referring to, well just look at the link I posted up above.
Can people stop posting this like it means something? I think we all know the Wii U will be superior to the PS3/360. That's not what anyone is concerned or arguing about.
So you they switch to a different design gpu, that doesn't make sense. Both insiders have been saying the same things.
Like I said early in this thread wiiu will be the Xbox to ps2(ps360).
It's not credible if it's not anonymous.
Can people stop posting this like it means something? I think we all know the Wii U will be superior to the PS3/360. That's not what anyone is concerned or arguing about.
So you they switch to a different design gpu, that doesn't make sense. Both insiders have been saying the same things.
Like I said early in this thread wiiu will be the Xbox to ps2(ps360).
So you they switch to a different design gpu, that doesn't make sense. Both insiders have been saying the same things.
Like I said early in this thread wiiu will be the Xbox to ps2(ps360).
I was trying not to put him on the spot.
Click this link in the other quote in this post. My feelings are based on the insider comments. The thing is, you're talking about visually while I'm talking about raw performance. So yeah, it's 360+ visually, but it's a bit more than that in terms of tech. (And, really, if it were only just above 360 in terms of power, any game using the controller would end up looking worse than the 360 version.)
The old devkit used an R700. That doesn't mean anything when the final GPU is custom. A dev here actually said that it has 2011/2012 bells and whistles.
You understand amd design the gpu? Its a old card if they wanted a dx11 card those are out and are old designs too.
I don't know how you get it some power full console based off the comments. I don't see how you can be way more powerful but not produce better looking games. Unless its just a poor design.
You understand amd design the gpu? Its a old card if they wanted a dx11 card those are out and are old designs too.
I don't know how you get it some power full console based off the comments. I don't see how you can be way more powerful but not produce better looking games. Unless its just a poor design.
You understand amd design the gpu? Its a old card if they wanted a dx11 card those are out and are old designs too.
I don't know how you get it some power full console based off the comments. I don't see how you can be way more powerful but not produce better looking games. Unless its just a poor design.
Because you're going to need next-generation hardware that is 8-10 times more powerful than what's currently available to produce an immediately appreciable leap in graphics.
Having a PC as your main gaming go-to is totally justified when you end up getting bargains like Arkham City for £5 and Rayman for £9.99.
The amount of money I've saved is ridiculous - the price of building the damn thing has effectively been written off due to the money I've saved on buying games compared to if I'd got a console..