Souldriver said:
Awesome! Can't wait.J2 Cool said:
Wow, you could knock me over with a breath of air. Looks like the perfect blend of story, heart, and comedy coupled with Pixar's AAA animation.J2 Cool said:
Interesting.J2 Cool said:Well, considering worldwide sales, Pixar films put 300 to shame. It's just GAF that has limited interest. I think if I would have put "Pixar's 'Ratatouille'" the thread would be better off. Not many people even know the film yet.
Brad Bird is indeed a hero of our times; I sure would love ot see him get a nomination, if not an award. I sure do hope Disney can find some of their magic again --I'm still on the fence with Meet the Robinsons, but at least the animation looks ace.J2 Cool said:Yeah, I suppose your right, but this was pretty much predicted by the Pixar staff years back. Saying watch out for shitty animated tales trying to follow up our success. They think CG is money. Now the times come when all their stuff is being pushed out and it's junk. The good thing for the future of the animation industry is Disney being pushed back on track - with films of both CG and hand drawn.
Then you have the short film which always has talent from the industry working on them. And Disney itself will start creating short films again. At least Goofy shorts announced as of now. I mean, consider the possibility of 2 great animated films a year and I don't think there's been that kind of production ever. That is if Disney can be great again. I'm also a fan of Andrew Stanton and expecting big things from Wall-E. The future looks alright imo. Just gotta let the shit fly by.
Btw, I wouldn't be the least bit suprised if Brad Bird gets an oscar nom for best original screenplay for this again. He works with an ease - creating original, thoughtful, funny, creative films. He's far more in control of his craft than most manipulative writers in Hollywood. I think the academy recognizes it as well. The guys still has passion and energy meanwhile to put his hand over the animation team as a whole and inspire original, well acted stuff. And then direct the film.
GAF responds to easily repeatable catch phrases and memes, not story or heart.Mr. Spinnington said:It's a shame that this thread has only two pages, whereas the 300 thread had like a million responses on the first trailer alone.
jett said:This movie looks so ****ing great. Without Brad Bird Pixar is nothing(to me).
really? I've laughed at all the trailers, and laughed hard at the most recent (before terebithia iirc). Ever since reading about Lassetter and how much time he has personally put into overseeing the movie.. I just have a feeling WDFA (or at least Lassetter and Catmull through WDFA) is trying to make a statement with it. That the general crapiness that we've endured since Pocahontas is done with.. hopefully I'm right.SteveMeister said:Ugh, Meet the Robinsons looks like complete & utter crap. But if you are willing to take one for the team, let us know how it is![]()
Teh Hamburglar said:The trailer LOOKED nice. But the movie looks like a snorefest.
Have a synopsis of the old story?Dan said:^ June 29
Brad Bird rewrote the entire script using the same characters () and locations.except for changing the old chef to a figment of Remy's imagination
I don't think one's public, at least one detailed enough to reveal what changed with Bird's revision. The only change I know that's confirmed istemp said:Have a synopsis of the old story?
Milhouse31 said:Could someone post a direct link ?
Disney is forbidding me to watch that trailer since I'm not in the US. I'm redirected to the international website each times.
GOD I HATE THAT.
Thanks
Steve Meister said:Ugh, Meet the Robinsons looks like complete & utter crap. But if you are willing to take one for the team, let us know how it is.![]()
This isnt a review or critique of Meet The Robinsons, but I saw the film today at a screening at the El Capitan, in 3-D.
In a nutshell, its a very likeable film with eye-popping visuals, gorgeous art direction and pleasing character designs. The 3-D is great. The Streamline Moderne future is pretty cool, though the architecture reminded me more of Music Land (the 1935 Silly Symphony) than Tomorrowland. The story is a bit disjointedshifting from heartwarming reality one moment to off-the-wall zaniness the next. In Disney terms, think if Pollyanna were grafted into Babes In Toyland. But it does hang together pretty well.
The film ends with a great quotefrom Walt Disney himself:
Around here, however, we dont look backwards for very long. We keep moving forward, opening up new doors and doing new things and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.
Walt Disney
This quote perfectly caps the theme of the movie, but even moreso, it sends a subtle message about Lasseters commitment to Disney heritageand possibly states a new direction for the beleaguered animation studio. Or at least Id like to think so.
Am I reading too much into this? All I know is the quote was a nice touch, and I left the theater feeling pretty optimistic about the futureof Disney.
J2 Cool said:Well, considering worldwide sales, Pixar films put 300 to shame. It's just GAF that has limited interest. I think if I would have put "Pixar's 'Ratatouille'" the thread would be better off. Not many people even know the film yet.