Support NeoGAF

[CuteFaceJay]

RDR 2 will be getting DLSS soon. Some folks on the steam forums speculate June.

Link: https://www.pcgamer.com/uk/red-dead-redemption-2-dlss-support/

 

[Bernd Lauert]

Everything's better than that shitty TAA the game currently has.

 

[Synless]

Can they do that for PlayStation so it’s doesn’t have the dog shit blur filter that Xbox doesn’t have? is that too much to ask?

 

[RoyBatty]

I would have loved that it has DLSS from release

 

[FromDuskTillGameOver]

ok thats it! fiiiine i will double dip just for sightseeing.

 

[ManaByte]

Can they do that for PlayStation so it’s doesn’t have the dog shit blur filter that Xbox doesn’t have? is that too much to ask?

 

[Krappadizzle]

Better late than never. Will make future replays nice. Game is stunning on PC.

 

[ManaByte]

Will start playing RDO on PC when this hits.

 

[Croga]

Be nice if they decided to fix the immersion breaking camp bug where everyone moans about Arthur "freezing to death" every 2 seconds that has been in the game since last December first.

But it's Rockstar, so fuck fixing the single player game.

 

[LiquidMetal14]

Great news to read. The game should be closer to 120fps locked on my rig now.

 

[JohnnyFootball]

I'd rather the console versions get PS5 and XSX support. DLSS support does little for the shortage.

Get those!

 

[KyoZz]

That's so awesome, I guess I'm in for another 100 hours

 

[Real-HipHopGamer]

I would have loved that it has DLSS from release

DLSS is beyond a game changer it will be the next new standard across the board for more gamers to have high level impact at a lesser cost of entry, real talk it's about to be real crazy especially in 2023 stay tuned

 

[Kazza]

This is very good news. I remember when people were worried about DLSS not catching on, so it's great to see even old games like this getting it implemented. If the new Nintendo Switch has some form of DLSS, then it will become even more widespread.

 

[Retinoid]

This is very good news. I remember when people were worried about DLSS not catching on, so it's great to see even old games like this getting it implemented. If the new Nintendo Switch has some form of DLSS, then it will become even more widespread.

DLSS 1.0 wasn't exactly the best, so people were rightly skeptical about the tech at the time. Thankfully Nvidia knocked it out the park with DLSS 2.0 because it really is a game changer - and it's only going to get better with newer implementations. Also, AMD bringing FSR to both AMD and Nvidia cards is great for competition.

 

[Soulblighter31]

DLSS 1.0 wasn't exactly the best, so people were rightly skeptical about the tech at the time. Thankfully Nvidia knocked it out the park with DLSS 2.0 because it really is a game changer - and it's only going to get better with newer implementations. Also, AMD bringing FSR to both AMD and Nvidia cards is great for competition.

I would not exactly say its great what amd is doing. They're not really competing with anyone, they're segregating the market with vastly inferior solutions. An AMD partnered game means poor ray traced solutions, no DLSS, and if we look at Valhalla or previously Dirt 5, severe gimping on any nvidia card.

If amd's super resolution will look in every game like how their Godfall screens look, god help us. You're better of turning down settings and resolution and you'll get a better image that what amd provides. Their solution could just mean locking out games from DLSS and gimping them with their embarassing option. Or if we're lucky, devs will just use their own reconstruction techniques which all of them look better than what amd showed.

What the Metro Exodus devs said recently before they were forced to edit suddenly makes a lot more sense:

We will not be adding specific support for this, as it is not compatible with our rendering techniques. However we have our own Temporal based reconstruction tech implemented that natively provides the same or better image quality benefits for all hardware.

AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution may be finalised but won't be compatible with all games

Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition devs announce that AMD's upcoming DLSS alternative won't be supported due to incompatibility issues.

www.pcgamer.com

 

[Kazza]

DLSS 1.0 wasn't exactly the best, so people were rightly skeptical about the tech at the time. Thankfully Nvidia knocked it out the park with DLSS 2.0 because it really is a game changer - and it's only going to get better with newer implementations. Also, AMD bringing FSR to both AMD and Nvidia cards is great for competition.

Yeah, in retrospect 1.0 almost seems like a proof of concept.

Does anyone here use DLSS for 1080p displays? I've recently bought a laptop with an RTX3060, so can play pretty much anything at max settings for now, but it's life could be extended considerably if DLSS becomes ultra common, and works well with 1080p output. Playing at 540p internal resolution should give a nice performance boost.

 

[JohnnyFootball]

DLSS 1.0 wasn't exactly the best, so people were rightly skeptical about the tech at the time. Thankfully Nvidia knocked it out the park with DLSS 2.0 because it really is a game changer - and it's only going to get better with newer implementations. Also, AMD bringing FSR to both AMD and Nvidia cards is great for competition.

1.0 was absolute trash. 2.0 was one of the most impressive improvements I have ever seen. Specifically looking at the Death Stranding videos.

 

[DeaDPo0L84]

So my purchase of RDR2 on PC that I never played is finally justified.

 

[lefty1117]

That's so awesome, I guess I'm in for another 100 hours

Lennnyyyyy!! Lenny?

 

[KyoZz]

Red Dead Redemption 2 DLSS Patch releases on July 13th​

Rockstar has just announced that the DLSS patch for Red Dead Redemption 2 will release on July 13th.
According to the team, both Red Dead Redemption 2 and Red Dead Online will support DLSS, allowing RTX owners to gain better performance.

Red Dead Redemption 2 DLSS Patch releases on July 13th

Rockstar has just announced that the DLSS patch for Red Dead Redemption 2 will release on July 13th.

www.dsogaming.com

 

[M.W.]

Nice. $36 at Green Man Gaming

 

[M1chl]

Can they do that for PlayStation so it’s doesn’t have the dog shit blur filter that Xbox doesn’t have? is that too much to ask?

Just look at transistor count.

PS5 around 11.5B
RTX3060 around 13.25B (and that's just a GPU)

 

[captainraincoat]

Can they do that for PlayStation so it’s doesn’t have the dog shit blur filter that Xbox doesn’t have? is that too much to ask?

Turn off HDR….makes it look better
Won’t fix the red difference but it gets rid of the bourbon camera you get in some parts

 

[GymWolf]

Yes please, i stopped my second run on pc because performances were all over the place.

 

[MikeM]

Can they do that for PlayStation so it’s doesn’t have the dog shit blur filter that Xbox doesn’t have? is that too much to ask?

That will be the remaster. $70.

 

[Kilau]

Now they just need a patch to make the game not be a boring slog to play.

 

[LiquidMetal14]

I wonder if it's using the new version if not those of us who have it and enjoy the more improved dlss experience.

 

[Max_Po]

Yes please, i stopped my second run on pc because performances were all over the place.

Yes, I can't get 60 fps with everything ULTRA!!!

 

[Max_Po]

Now they just need a patch to make the game not be a boring slog to play.

if you load the game and go in hot weather area.. your Horse's testicles swell up ... try sucking on those...

 

[GymWolf]

Yes, I can't get 60 fps with everything ULTRA!!!

I'm not that type of player but nice try dude.

 

[Kilau]

if you load the game and go in hot weather area.. your Horse's testicles swell up ... try sucking on those...

I mean...if the game was made for ball suckers no wonder you like it so much. Keep on keeping on my dude.

 

[lefty1117]

if you load the game and go in hot weather area.. your Horse's testicles swell up ... try sucking on those...

they actually droop not swell

 

[Dusktildawn48]

People that hate RDR2 ALWAYS have to tell everyone they hate RDR2.

 

[SSfox]

Nobody made a thread about the Blood Money Update or what

PS: On the topic, good news for Nvidia users, still waiting for my PS5 upgrade update, it would too dumb from Rockstar if they won't release an upgrade patch of PS5 and Xbox Serie X tbh. Hopefully this will come and can't wait.

 

[JRW]

Everything's better than that shitty TAA the game currently has.

For sure, I still remember enabling DLSS in Death Stranding for the first time and couldn't believe how much better it looked vs. TAA.

 

[hlm666]

PS: On the topic, good news for Nvidia users, still waiting for my PS5 upgrade update, it would too dumb from Rockstar if they won't release an upgrade patch of PS5 and Xbox Serie X tbh. Hopefully this will come and can't wait.

Probably want to sell some form of upgraded version like they did with gta5 last gen.

 

[vaibhavpisal]

DLSS is beyond a game changer it will be the next new standard across the board for more gamers to have high level impact at a lesser cost of entry, real talk it's about to be real crazy especially in 2023 stay tuned

PS5 die size: 308 sqmm
RTX 2060 die size: 445 sqmm

PS5 has lots more power and a processor built in at 2/3 die size. Even smallest dlss capable cards have more silicon than next gen consoles.

When you are not using RTX or dlss features, you are basically using 1/3 silicon you have on your GPU. That's why graphics chips tend to be expensive.

 

[Buggy Loop]

When you are not using RTX or dlss features, you are basically using 1/3 silicon you have on your GPU. That's why graphics chips tend to be expensive.

If it would be on consoles, it logically would be implemented on the API directly for all games, just like DLSS is creeping up in game engines now and will be much more available. Maybe not RTX (but could also be used for spatial sound, not everything is GI/reflections), but DLSS definitely should always be on.

 

[Mozzarella]

DLSS is one of the great features. Good upgrade for RDR2.

 

[vaibhavpisal]

If it would be on consoles, it logically would be implemented on the API directly for all games, just like DLSS is creeping up in game engines now and will be much more available. Maybe not RTX (but could also be used for spatial sound, not everything is GI/reflections), but DLSS definitely should always be on.

They already have a software based solution that does not require 1/3-1/4 of your precious silicon die.

 

[Buggy Loop]

They already have a software based solution that does not require 1/3-1/4 of your precious silicon die.

I'm sorry, what software solution? Care to be more specific?

 

[Droxcy]

Might be going in for another play through game was brilliant

 

[vaibhavpisal]

I'm sorry, what software solution? Care to be more specific?

Temporal upsampling, checkerboarding etc.

Not as good as dlss.

But dlss needs silicon die space which can be used to increase teraflops, negating need for upscaling in first place.

 

[Virt McPolygon]

Pretty cool. This game needed it!

 

[//DEVIL//]

Temporal upsampling, checkerboarding etc.

Not as good as dlss.

But dlss needs silicon die space which can be used to increase teraflops, negating need for upscaling in first place.

No that is not correct . Not even close.
And FYI, tensor cores are not just for DlSS and doesn’t take much of the die space . That space even if you remove it, won’t gain you the 50% boost in performance seen in DLSS.
In competitive gaming using dlss actually lower your latency too since it renders at lower resolution ( I can even confirm this with Cold War with about 2 ms difference at least )

also it lowers the load on your gpu so less temp and less fan curve.
It will also help in future games if your native can’t hit a desired frames.
DLSS honestly is a win no matter how you look at it. The fact it even enhance the game graphics in some situations is just perfection.

there is nothing comes close to it . Not a software solution is half as good as DLSS.

 

[vaibhavpisal]

No that is not correct . Not even close.
And FYI, tensor cores are not just for DlSS and doesn’t take much of the die space . That space even if you remove it, won’t gain you the 50% boost in performance seen in DLSS.

How much space tensor cores take up?

Why is GTX 2060 die size 50% bigger than ps5 that also includes ryzen processor?

EVGA's GeForce RTX 2060 KO Edition Features the Same Die as the RTX 2080 | Hardware Times

Here’s something interesting. EVGA’s RTX 2060 KO Edition happens to feature the same GPU die as the higher-end RTX 2080. If you’re wondering whether it performs the same too, I’m afraid it’s not quite like that. These are defective dies that couldn’t be used in RTX 2080s or 2070s, and instead of...

www.hardwaretimes.com

 

[MrFunSocks]

Kinda on topic, but kinda not - as a newcomer to the PC Master Race, I have a Ultrawide 3440x1440p monitor and I'm not sure if DLSS can actually be of any use to me? In Doom Eternal when I turn it on, I see the trails on the little meteor bits in that opening scene to indicate that DLSS is working, so what does that mean in terms of the resolution that it's running at? Would it be rendering less than 1440p and DLSS'ing up to 1440p? Or is it going to be DLSS'ing 1440p up to 4K and then supersampling down to the 1440p monitor resolution?

 

[CrustyBritches]

Yeah, in retrospect 1.0 almost seems like a proof of concept.

Does anyone here use DLSS for 1080p displays? I've recently bought a laptop with an RTX3060, so can play pretty much anything at max settings for now, but it's life could be extended considerably if DLSS becomes ultra common, and works well with 1080p output. Playing at 540p internal resolution should give a nice performance boost.

I realize this post is somewhat old and you've probably had a chance to experiment more, but for posterity's sake, here's some shots of DOOM Eternal running 1080p Native vs DLSS(Quality), RT enabled...

1080p Native:

1080p DLSS(Quality):

1080p Native+DRS 144fps target:

1080p DLSS(Qualtiy)+DRS 144fps target:

This is using DLSS 2.1, not the new 2.2 .dll. In gameplay I prefer the look of DLSS(Quality) over native, even disregarding any frame rate target. It looks crisp and clean. Once you get into DRS with high frame rate target for high refresh laptop screen that usually ships with RTX 3xxx laptops, then the non-DLSS, native res with DRS enabled takes a massive hit to image quality.

 

[MrFunSocks]

I realize this post is somewhat old and you've probably had a chance to experiment more, but for posterity's sake, here's some shots of DOOM Eternal running 1080p Native vs DLSS(Quality), RT enabled...

This is using DLSS 2.1, not the new 2.2 .dll. In gameplay I prefer the look of DLSS(Quality) over native, even disregarding any frame rate target. It looks crisp and clean. Once you get into DRS with high frame rate target for high refresh laptop screen that usually ships with RTX 3xxx laptops, then the non-DLSS, native res with DRS enabled takes a massive hit to image quality.

Pretty insane that the DLSS reconstructed 1080p looks better than native 1080p. How does that even make any sense haha.