lherre said:Reach is 720p? (I'm honestly asking)
ThanksJAVK said:FTFY
chandoog said:
JRW said:Quick and dirty edit in Paint, I noticed some things missing on PS3 when looking at this shot, I drew an arrow above each area in question.
Teknoman said:Not at all. Everything is cool except for the 360 users having online problems, and everyone having problems getting social club stuff to work because the servers were being hammered (but thats fine now). Other than that, everyones soaking up the atmosphere and going on about how great the game is ( in both SP and MP when working).
bj00rn_ said:In the big picture, the difference doesn't really matter, I'm sure it doesn't take anything from the overall experience.
However, relative to the purpose of this thread especially for those of us with multiple systems, the difference is rather significant.
GreekWolf said:Neither Mazinger nor Quaz have a vested interest in either console.
bj00rn_ said:..Or maybe the 360 team just got better at programming the 360 than the PS3 team got better at the PS3?
Huggy said:The aggressive LOD in the PS3 version might be an indication they ran into fillrate problems.
goonergaz said:If this is true why does he state the engine is no improvement on GTA4 (when clearly it is) and that the frame-rate is a horrible mess (when all other evidence counters this)?
He also mentions this is the worst port ever!?!? LMAO!
Some people like to exagerate to make a small difference massive, if you took his words alone it appears RDR is a graphical and unplayable mess on PS3 when that's simply not true.
These sorts of bias comment lose him credibility (or at least make him look biased) IMHO.
Huggy said:I think RDR is just better suited to the 360. Probably because of the foliage rendering. I'm no expert on it, but I believe you can do some cool tricks when processing alpha in textures with later direct X versions.
The aggressive LOD in the PS3 version might be an indication they ran into fillrate problems.
iNvidious01 said:why are people still denying this :lol
its obvious, the 360 version is sharper, better framerate,
less pop issues, whilst the ps3 has foliage missing,
looks blurry and worse than gta iv on ps3.
this is bullshit, thought rockstar would remember they
owe everything to playstation fans who took em to fame.
bad port
Raide said:Does it make the PS3 version utterly unplayable and not fun to play?
Raide said:Does it make the PS3 version utterly unplayable and not fun to play?
V_Arnold said:Dont think so. Remember though, that we live in this binary world, where everything HAS to be GAME OF THE YEAR or epic flop/bomba/failure - therefore, the ports are either perfect, or are worst ports ever.
So go ahead and buy it on PS3 if you have PS3 friends to play together, and buy on 360, if you have 360 friends to play together with.
schennmu said:MazingerDUDE is a fanboy now, right. That's why he was the first person to report the sub hd resolution of Alan Wake.
manzo said:The shitty PS3 port of Bayonetta didn't make the game unplayable.
Suzzopher said:Really? Before the install patch the game was a chore due to loading times. I played the 360 version after and enjoyed the game laods. On PS3 it was horrible.
manzo said:I meant the framerate problems.
Majine said:Oh, man. I was hoping to the bitter end that all the uproar was caused by fanboys. But now... this is such a shame... I can't afford another xbox !!!
I hear what you are saying, but It kinda feels frustrating having bought the (at the time) most expensive system, and me being a huge Rockstar fan since, well, GTA2.goonergaz said:Well hearing from people that have actually bought and played the PS3 version - I've not heard any complaints. IMHO sure there are differences, but nothing game breaking.
Benson said:Ugh, I ordered the PS3 version under the assumption that R* would've learned something from GTA IV. I don't know what to do now, my order has already been dispatched so I can't cancel it.
Well, if you haven't opened it up yet, you usually can return it, no?Benson said:Ugh, I ordered the PS3 version under the assumption that R* would've learned something from GTA IV. I don't know what to do now, my order has already been dispatched so I can't cancel it.
Benson said:Ugh, I ordered the PS3 version under the assumption that R* would've learned something from GTA IV. I don't know what to do now, my order has already been dispatched so I can't cancel it.
spats said:I'm a bit relieved that it's a shitty port, gives me one more reason to skip this game.
Raide said:What were the other reasons?
spats said:I'm a bit relieved that it's a shitty port, gives me one more reason to skip this game.
960x704 > 1152x640 ?MYE said:It was either this or R&C: Crack in Time.....
....
.....Crack in Time it is
spats said:I find the western setting incredibly drab (don't like western movies either) and can't afford to spend more money on games right now.
One thing's for certain, if I only owned one console, I would steer far away from these comparison threads. When the facts come out, you have a 50/50 shot of validating your purchase.Benson said:Ugh, I ordered the PS3 version under the assumption that R* would've learned something from GTA IV. I don't know what to do now, my order has already been dispatched so I can't cancel it.