Manmademan
Member
No, windows phone guy is head of all hardware & services.
looks like it's both but we're way off topic.
No, windows phone guy is head of all hardware & services.
No, windows phone guy is head of all hardware & services.
No, windows phone guy is head of all hardware & services.
You do realize a lot of the OS is built around the camera right? If they remove it then they have to make a lot of modifications to OS functionality. It's not that simple. Had they designed the OS with the camera as optional then I would agree with your sentiments. Could it happen? Yes. Will it happen at launch? Probably not.
I see it being like the 3D slider on the 3DS. Most people would prefer it just set to off.
Does that mean you HAVE to use Kinect on the os or will you be ables to just use the controller like with the 360?
I don't think the word insecure means what you think it means. Insecure has to do with self esteem and ones level of confidence.
Does that mean you HAVE to use Kinect on the os or will you be ables to just use the controller like with the 360?
Yea, and there were benefits. Benefits that we no longer have. I don't care what anyone says.
This was bs when it first came up, and it's still bs now. It was full games with no time limit.
Whichever you prefer, or both even.
Now we get to see this daily reputation management BS. Guy works at MS gets all kinds of perks but wants to go rogue on message board and tow company lines.
Whichever you prefer, or both even.
Source?
But does my question about gameplay make sense? I honestly don't know.
Edit: Woops, sorry for the double post, I thought I had posted the previous one in a different thread.
right. but the camera is required for the system to boot up.
for the OS it's optional, though kinect voice commands may be the "ideal" way to navigate- a controller may be cumbersome and really only ideal as a backup solution.
Sony has NEVER had a loud console.if this is true and the ps4 is loud i might just buy a X1, even though i really really don't want to.
Like saying the PS4 is more powerful?
Sony has NEVER had a loud console.
for the OS it's optional, though kinect voice commands may be the "ideal" way to navigate- a controller may be cumbersome and really only ideal as a backup solution.
The actual problem is the games in development, which are ALL assuming kinect is mandatory, and may have functionality that will not work without it. If microsoft flips on this it puts developers in a VERY bad spot, release targets will be missed, and MS will most certainly be sued for breach of contract. edit: imagine the fallout if the PS3 just "removed blu-ray" or made it optional 4 months before launch. it would be a clusterfuck.
no kinect isn't happening.
Sony has NEVER had a loud console.
or the sun rises in the west.
it definitely has a power button somewhere. MS isnt stupid.
There were benefits though, such as physical games being diskless.Just the fact that this guy used the word "benefit" to describe DRM nullifies any point he was trying to make.
Holy sweet heavenly fuck MS has gone bananas.
I see it being like the 3D slider on the 3DS. Most people would prefer it just set to off.
PS3 fat with games like Uncharted 2&3, GOW can be really loud.
At this point that's just stating the obvious, like the sky is blue or the sun rises in the west.
The messaging on this since sony's reveal has been simply to obfuscate (specs? what specs?) deny that specifications matter, or in this case, saying that it's stronger, but "how much" isn't really known.
this is right in line with what MS has been saying for weeks.
i very well may be the biggest sony cheerleader on this board, but even I admit my BC-era 80 gig sounds like a goddamn jet plane and always has.
True, and Xbox One can very well be loud with some more intensive games in a few years.
I am really hoping that MS is holding onto Kinect for reasons of great gameplay they cant show off yet.
This lag is nowhere near enough for you to notice any delays. It won't have any effect on 60fps games.
What makes those developers think just because its in each box that people will buy the software? The people will just still not buy it even if they have to deal with the camera plugged.
please link to a direct statement by MS explicitly stating that the PS4 has better specs.
I do want to remind people – this interview was done six weeks ago, before E3. It’s not like we just decided to talk about it. So it wasn't that I just decided to call up OXM and give the my opinion
I would like to pose this question to the audience. There are several months until the consoles launch, and any student of the industry will remember, specs change.
Given the rumored specs for both systems, can anyone conceive of a circumstance or decision one platform holder could make, where despite the theoretical performance benchmarks of the components, the box that appears “weaker” could actually be more powerful?
I believe the debate on this could give some light to why we don’t want to engage in a specification debate until both boxes are final and shipping.
I am really hoping that MS is holding onto Kinect for reasons of great gameplay they cant show off yet.
and not just OS navigation.....
Cboat is a shady source? How?
Your internet isn't the problem. Its MS's authentication servers. At any point in time they can pull the plug and lose your purchase.Maybe its just dependent on your life style. My internet has gone out for more then 24 hours probably once in the past 9 or so years. And i like owning physical copies.
"Can't comment on the rumor.
The facts are on paper, the PS4 has better specs and the most you can debate is by how much.
What I can tell you is I have played Forza, Killer instinct, and Ryse on the Xbox One. They look as good as the games I play on a high end PC. Ryse reminded me of darksiders II."
"The majority of the masses care only about the console, except that the success of the Kinect carries much more weight to us. The sensor costs almost as much as the console to make."
"As I mentioned earlier, I don't know what price point the Xbox One would be at without the Kinect, but it would be much less than 399.
I see it not as a market that no longer exists, but one that haven't been explored due to technological limitations."
Why not? It's widely agreed upon that MS's PR was absolutely terrible during E3Again with this.
Lots of great game play implementation, like that thing... uh, voice commands~!
Seriously. Most unorganized garbage that millions of people just love.
making me want to cancel my preorder again
If this is true, then why even have it required to be plugged in?
Is this legit? Somehow I can't believe this is real. The mods on reddit also denied astroturfing. I don't believe anything from that site anymore.
Because better specs mean better gameplay. You really think they will max out the spec in the first few years? They really don't mean much till much later down the line.
No, I am hoping for a game MS has under wraps that uses Kinects motion capture extremely well.
Maybe Kinect is just that much better...?
One can only hope..