Nintendo wouldn't make the same mistake again, and the game is also mostly complete. They've been working on Skyward Sword for around 5 years now.BlackNMild2k1 said:But how do you know Skyward Sword doesn't pull a Twilight Princess?
Nintendo wouldn't make the same mistake again, and the game is also mostly complete. They've been working on Skyward Sword for around 5 years now.BlackNMild2k1 said:But how do you know Skyward Sword doesn't pull a Twilight Princess?
The numbers are from their quarterly earnings release.carlo6529 said:What's the source of that chart?
Pachinko said:CPU/GPU somewhere around 90-125% of what the ps3/360 can currently do in practice, on paper it may look a bit weaker.
It would be tactical for Nintendo to release the Wii 2 near the US/EU release of the NGP march/spring. Announcement at E3 2011, little to no leaks because of how similar the tech and engine requirements do the new console will be so that Nintendo doesn't hand out kits until before then. Publishers have leaned from the Wii not to not support it from the start, but we won't hear from them until nintendos fall conference. Firmware update to unite 3DS and Wii 2 online ecosystem!ThoseDeafMutes said:The meme about the SWii being "a generation behind the curve technologically" is kind of strange considering there is no rational reason why this is necessarily the case. It's like people think that you can only progress a generation at a time, and by falling back with the Wii they can't catch up anymore. The reality is that they will design a system using the technology available to them, and designing a modern one is no more difficult than designing one that is 360/PS3 level of power, especially when they can just use COST technology in their box, or just pay money to ATi and say "like, I want a next gen GPU, focusing on power draw minimization".
To crush their enemies?miksar said:They don't care. They are happy enough with PS360 crowd and it is unlikely to change in the near future. Previously Nintendo designed their systems around their own needs. 3DS was the first case they made it more powerful than usual and they stated during E3 presentation last year that it was specifically for 3rd party. The same can happen with Wii's successor but it won't make Activision/EA and other big guns think differently. The best we can hope is early PS3 level of support, meaning that most of the core multiplatform games will be noticeably worse than on PS360 due to the lack of good online and almost the same graphics. That's why typical CoD crowd won't really care, so why should Nintendo care if they are happy with the market they dominate right now?
Alienshogun said:Nintendo has been dead since N64 anyway.
AceBandage said:Dead all the way to the bank.
So 5 million to go?JoshuaJSlone said:If they care at all about multiplatform games, it's best to remove as many barriers as possible. Is DVD plenty for Nintendo? Maybe, but so was 1.5 GB plenty for them GameCube generation. It would be a Bad Thing if their next home console were to use DVD and even 3DS started getting cards that could hold more.
Shipped as of the end of last year:
:lolAlienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
o...................kAlienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
you'd be surprised what twists of logic gaf is capable ofVic said:Joke post. Has to be.
Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
GAF. GAF never changes.Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
They need to go 3rd party, amirite?Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
Aren't you the dude that took away smileys from us?Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
BURN THE WITCHBoney said:Aren't you the dude that took away smileys from us?
Boney said:Aren't you the dude that took away smileys from us?
Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
DoomXploder7 said:yes and now we can't even use it in commenting on his post
oh the ironyDoomXploder7 said:yes and now we can't even use it in commenting on his post
Well, placing the blame entirely on him is certainly unfair, but he was the last to use 'em in uh December's NPD against an Evilore post, the dude had been thinking for a few weeks/months/years that smileys were unconstructive towards discussion exactly because of laughing at posts instead of answering.ThoseDeafMutes said:Explain? I understand smileys aren't here anymore, but what did he have to do with them?
Or are you just joking around.
Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
ThoseDeafMutes said:Explain? I understand smileys aren't here anymore, but what did he have to do with them?
Or are you just joking around.
Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
JoshuaJSlone said:Shipped as of the end of last year:
You make ninjas look bad out in the open like that.Alienshogun said:
Nintendo didn't make a mistake last time with Twilight Princess's positioning on Wii. It was the perfect catch all to get the hardcore to the next system.Big One said:Nintendo wouldn't make the same mistake again, and the game is also mostly complete. They've been working on Skyward Sword for around 5 years now.
GregLombardi said:Nintendo didn't make a mistake last time with Twilight Princess's positioning on Wii. It was the perfect catch all to get the hardcore to the next system.
They made a mistake with the oversight of the actual gameplay. THIS is the mistake they won't make this time. Their positioning of it will be as perfect as ever, I'd predict.
Snakeyes said:I can sure picture Iwata, Shiggy and Miyamoto sitting at a Nextendo hardware meeting and going "Careful, don't want to make it too powerful! Can't make it seem like we are getting with the times now!"
How was it a mistake?Big One said:Nintendo wouldn't make the same mistake again, and the game is also mostly complete. They've been working on Skyward Sword for around 5 years now.
People on the internet did not like the first hour.Lonely1 said:How was it a mistake?
they stepped aside a long time ago and created a new marketAlienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.
at the same time the game is the second biggest zelda game saleswise after ocarina and features the best dungeons in a 3d zelda game everShockingAlberto said:People on the internet did not like the first hour.
ShockingAlberto said:People on the internet did not like the first hour.
I think he meant the GAFfer.Khrno said:Mirrors indeed.
it took me bout 20 mins to get to the first dungeonEmmanuelMunoz said:Was it even an hour? People just need to wait a bit longer
Stephen Colbert said:As far as consoles are concerned, the Nintendo approach didn't work out for them with either the n64 or the Gamecube.
Stephen Colbert said:They lucked out with the Wii
Stephen Colbert said:but even here they failed at getting third party support and their overall software sales haven't been too hot.
Stephen Colbert said:I wouldn't say their approach always works out for them with consoles.
Stephen Colbert said:Matching the specs of upcoming consoles (ps4/720) is the easiest way to ensure they get multiplatform games released for their system as well. I hope they are looking at the AMD Bulldozer.
Celine said:GAF. GAF never changes.
BMF said:To crush their enemies?
Seriously, your theory is that if Nintendo put out a new console next year that was a bit more capable than the PS360 (1.5-2x) that 3rd parties wouldn't put the same games on it that already are being made for the other two?
Alienshogun said:Just because they are making money doesn't mean they are relevant to the gaming world anymore, the "meat" of the gaming world anyway. Their main contribution will be motion gaming which may change how FPS are played, that's it.
Nintendo needs to step it up, or step aside.