Stumpokapow
listen to the mad man
At what point do you just give up on these people, honestly?
"these" people are about 2 in 3 people in the United States and rising. (1 in 3 obese, 1 in 3 overweight)
Also:
At what point do you just give up on these people, honestly?
People probably aren't adding the calories from their big ass soda into the equation.
"these" people are about 2 in 3 people in the United States and rising. (1 in 3 obese, 1 in 3 overweight)
Also:
![]()
"these" people are about 2 in 3 people in the United States and rising. (1 in 3 obese, 1 in 3 overweight)
Also:
![]()
I think it's totally a matter of willpower. With the second biggest factor being ignorance.When you have a trend this large across a population this diverse I think its time some people start admitting that weight gain is not just a matter of "willpower" but that outside influences can have effects on people's behavior
When you have a trend this large across a population this diverse I think its time some people start admitting that weight gain is not just a matter of "willpower" but that outside influences can have effects on people's behavior
Salts and fats. So unhealthy.The problem that the chart clearly shows is that the issue is the way we process our foods now. Everything is loaded with preservatives, which add unhealthy things such as salts and fats. This was not an issue back in the 50-60's. I've also complained that is costs more money to eat healthier, which is counterproductive as well.
I guess signal colors have to work, because the food industry does everything in their power to not have those included.
Something like this:
![]()
UK study here: http://webarchive.nationalarchives....ood.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/pmpexecsummary.pdf
Additional information like "gotta walk 70 minutes" would be great as well, because it gives context. Most people don't know much about calories and such.
When you have a trend this large across a population this diverse I think its time some people start admitting that weight gain is not just a matter of "willpower" but that outside influences can have effects on people's behavior
It's entirely possible, if you're in your 80-100s, female, ~4'10", and very inactive. I'd say that's a pretty small portion of the population though.
When you have a trend this large across a population this diverse I think its time some people start admitting that weight gain is not just a matter of "willpower" but that outside influences can have effects on people's behavior
I think it's totally a matter of willpower. With the second biggest factor being ignorance.
So...what happened in the last thirty years then? What caused almost a hundred million people to lose their willpower?
Definitely. Fitness/diet gaf ignores this. You can't fight that "bootstraps" mentality.
So...what happened in the last thirty years then? What caused almost a hundred million people to lose their willpower?
To a degree I agree with him. For people just starting out I tell them to not even have unhealthy foods in the house to avoid temptation.
Nice generalization
And then that Domino's Pizza commercial comes on and you say "yeah, I'll give that a try." Not having it in the house is one thing, being able to not give in to the never ending stream of ads accompanied by inspirational music, smiling, active, attractive, skinny people EATING THE FUCK out of that food/drinking that beer...that's another story altogether.
It's totally doable to avoid, but it takes willpower, sometimes. Especially if you're working your way out of it, because everyone knows it's harder to quit than it is not to start.
Come on, you did as well. Really easy to point fingers when you have no idea what you are talking about.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=627061
Obesity isn't a local epidemic, it's worldwide. You have to take into account socio-economic factors that are easily dismissed or hard to discern.
Easy to dismiss people as ignorant or lacking willpower when there are forces greater than that involved. You think people want to be obese, have diabetes, heart disease and increased mortality by choice?
The problem that the chart clearly shows is that the issue is the way we process our foods now. Everything is loaded with preservatives, which add unhealthy things such as salts and fats. This was not an issue back in the 50-60's. I've also complained that is costs more money to eat healthier, which is counterproductive as well.
Nice try, bud.
We had this argument and you failed it pretty hard. Still waiting for the hopeless scenario where it's literally impossible to eat healthy for someone.
But instead of bringing up other threads in here to derail, PM me instead.
Mother: Day shift
Father: Night shift
Kids: elementary school+after school.
Poor, most likely a minority living in an area where shit closes at night and markets like Trader Joes, Whole Foods, Fresh & Easy are either out of the way and or prohibitively expensive.
Well we aren't a hunter-gatherer society and won't ever be again unless some kind of disaster happens.
Why wouldn't it? I'd assume they were more prone to overeating to accomodate periods where they didn't have much access to food. Considering the stomachs ability to stretch and shrink based on how much we eat, and 'our' ability to burn fat people seem to be made to be able to eat a lot.
uh, yes it would. Availability was the issue. They would have loved our food availability.
This was studied also by anthropologists studying displaced native peoples in the Pacific Islands from nuclear tests, as they exploded in size and health issues due to poverty and diet.
lol seriously?
There's a Penn and Teller Bullshit episode about fast good that's worth a watch on this topic. People know this stuff can be bad for them but they don't care. It's like smoking , they'll keep doing it no matter what you tell them.
http://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/downloads/State-Indicator-Report-Fruits-Vegetables-2013.pdf
Report on fruits and vegetable availability and consumption.
is this some kind of joke post?
Do you see yourself having to hunt your own food and forage for berries any time soon?
Frozen vegetables are at my Walmart. Are they not at every Walmart with food?
Depends on your specific location and price. Walmart in many places are in out of the way suburban areas not in urban ones due to zoning.
Ghettos, poor farming communities, rural towns.So where exactly is a location with absolutely no access to foods like chicken, frozen vegetables and rice? But plentiful supplies of fries, candy and chips?
In grad school I did an independent study on behavior methods and weight gain.
No surprise, we are surrounded by triggers to eat and constantly over eat
Ghettos, poor farming communities, rural towns.
OMG, PEOPLE AREN'T EATING HEALTHILY AT MCDONALDS?
Next you are going to tell me that people don't go to the Olive Garden for authentic italiano.
And the food stores or stores that have food exclusively sell junk, right?
I mean, come on, man. I'm not denying its harder for some people. I'm not denying people don't eat enough vegetables. But I absolutely refuse to believe people have LITERALLY no access to healthy foods, yet have plenty of access to junk.
2400 calories for men and 2000 for women?! Jesus christ I eat 2200 when I'm bulking and 1700 when I'm cutting, wtf. These recommendations are complete BS and that's the real problem.
Nutrition needs to be redone and overhauled in the way its taught. The "food pyramid" (even the revised one) has been shown to be completely inaccurate and counterproductive. The "2000" magic calorie number is equally as harmful. Stop the madness
"Lazy fat people how dare they eat cheap and filling food! They should cook instead those fat lazy fucks!"