• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Reuters: Entire Senate to Attend Briefing on North Korea at White House

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zolo

Member
This is what I thought of at first. My guess, and this is gonna sound super conspirational, is that he is gonna try to build support for a full on assault of NK, but wants to do it with legislative approval.

I have to imagine even Trump knows what could happen considering how Bush's reputation tanked, so I imagine he wants to be able to blame Congress if things go awry. I don't see them taking the bait this close to the Iraq war though.
 

Guy.brush

Member
I don't understand Trump's desire to make the Russia issue go away in the eyes of the public.

It's not doing shit in terms of the digging that the FBI and the CIA are doing, so why bother?

He is playing 1D poker and trying to prep his shitty cards:

"The dem infested deep state IC is unpatriotic and trying to sabotage this war. NK nuke imminent!"
"the fake news are trying to derail our greatest win"

He is still trying to create a counter-weight to critical media + IC with the frenetic base he is breeding. His end game is probably "do you want a civil war, then go ahead and arrest me".
And yes it is 1D.
The ugly part in all of this is that this is still a pure win for Putin's Russia. An extremely divided nation torn apart at the exploited fault lines is precisely what is written in their geopolitical playbook.
 

PixlNinja

Banned
It's possible Trump doesn't give a hoot about Bush's approval numbers. Part of me thinks he wants this to be his legacy.

If he can get the approval to launch an attack with the intent of toppling the regime and pulls it off, with a low civilian death toll AND the unification of Korea...holy shit. I know that's really far out thinking and likely not going to happen but this is the closest I can think of in my lifetime to the NK situation actually being dealt with and all kinds of shit is running through my head :/

The thought of Trump being elevated to the status that he would have if that all happened is just nuts. It would be Ronald Reagan X1000.

I'm also kind of high.
 

Guy.brush

Member
It's possible Trump doesn't give a hoot about Bush's approval numbers. Part of me thinks he wants this to be his legacy.

If he can get the approval to launch an attack with the intent of toppling the regime and pulls it off, with a low civilian death toll AND the unification of Korea...holy shit. I know that's really far out thinking and likely not going to happen but this is the closest I can think of in my lifetime to the NK situation actually being dealt with and all kinds of shit is running through my head :/

The thought of Trump being elevated to the status that he would have if that all happened is just nuts. It would be Ronald Reagan X1000.

I'm also kind of high.

You know even in Iraq with its liberation built on lies it looked quite good for a while. All those aces of the regime getting killed off, the statue of Saddam on the big square being toppled and now look at the middle east.

EVEN IF Trump would manage to decapacite the regime in a way that the death toll is basically a bunch of regime buildings, then what? South Korea takes over?
It could very well be that in 10 years time you would look at a new Korean demilitarized zone but this time it is China on one side and SK on the other.

Or imagine them doing one last final stealth mission where they use something else than a missile as a delivery system? And/or we get a radioactive contaminated Korean peninsula?
Regime change from the outside rarely if ever works, especially with all those parties and their divergent geopolitical interests. In a perverted way the region has had relative stability over the last 50 years. This is a "mission accomplished" aka hard blow back lesson in the making again.
 

tbm24

Member
It's possible Trump doesn't give a hoot about Bush's approval numbers. Part of me thinks he wants this to be his legacy.

If he can get the approval to launch an attack with the intent of toppling the regime and pulls it off, with a low civilian death toll AND the unification of Korea...holy shit. I know that's really far out thinking and likely not going to happen but this is the closest I can think of in my lifetime to the NK situation actually being dealt with and all kinds of shit is running through my head :/

The thought of Trump being elevated to the status that he would have if that all happened is just nuts. It would be Ronald Reagan X1000.

I'm also kind of high.
The second North Korea is attacked Soeul is gone. Not even factoring in the US military loves that will be lost, under no circumstances will be be able to pull anything off.
 

4Tran

Member
The ugly part in all of this is that this is still a pure win for Putin's Russia. An extremely divided nation torn apart at the exploited fault lines is precisely what is written in their geopolitical playbook.
Even Putin doesn't want Korean War redux. That's all on Trump.
 

PixlNinja

Banned
The second North Korea is attacked Soeul is gone. Not even factoring in the US military loves that will be lost, under no circumstances will be be able to pull anything off.

I know that line is said often but considering how dated their technology is, and things like failed missile launches...Is it possible that maybe that particular assessment is one that has been weakened over the decades?

I'm not going to pretend to know the ins and outs of war and weaponry, but whenever I see video or pictures of NK's arsenal it looks busted as fuck...their war rooms look like something out of the 70s...something just seems really off.

I mean we can't just overwhelm them before they have a chance to retaliate in any kind of meaningful way?
 

brian577

Banned
I know that line is said often but considering how dated their technology is, and things like failed missile launches...Is it possible that maybe that particular assessment is one that has been weakened over the decades?

I'm not going to pretend to know the ins and outs of war and weaponry, but whenever I see video or pictures of NK's arsenal it looks busted as fuck...their war rooms look like something out of the 70s...something just seems really off.

I mean we can't just overwhelm them before they have a chance to retaliate in any kind of meaningful way?

They have over 5 million soldiers. We'd win but it would be an ugly victory.
 

4Tran

Member
I know that line is said often but considering how dated their technology is, and things like failed missile launches...Is it possible that maybe that particular assessment is one that has been weakened over the decades?

I'm not going to pretend to know the ins and outs of war and weaponry, but whenever I see video or pictures of NK's arsenal it looks busted as fuck...their war rooms look like something out of the 70s...something just seems really off.

I mean we can't just overwhelm them before they have a chance to retaliate in any kind of meaningful way?
North Korean military gear is old-fashioned; they haven't had any significant modernization since about the '60s. However, old weapons are still quite deadly, and it's not as if modern artillery is significantly more dangerous than old artillery aside from an increase in accuracy. North Korea is fully capable of shelling Soeul and other South Korean targets and inflicting a lot of damage.

I don't think that this damage will be as devastating as it's made out to be but I don't think that anyone is interested in testing that assumption.

They have over 5 million soldiers. We'd win but it would be an ugly victory.
It's actually around a million soldiers. Even China only has 3 million soldiers and they have the largest military in the world.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
WaPo: Senate staff perplexed by unusual White House private briefing on North Korea
The White House announced Monday that it would host an unusual private briefing on North Korea for the entire Senate, prompting questions from lawmakers about whether the Trump administration intends to use the event as a photo op ahead of his 100-day mark.

Press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that the lawmakers would be briefed Wednesday by several senior administration officials, including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. He emphasized that the meeting plan had been conveyed by Senate leadership and that the White House was serving “as the location.”

Yet the White House setting perplexed lawmakers who have grown accustomed to such briefings taking place in a secure location on Capitol Hill, where there is more room to handle such a large group.
A senior Trump administration official said the meeting with senators will take place in the auditorium at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, the building next to the White House that houses most of the National Security Council. The auditorium will be temporarily turned into a “sensitive compartmented information facility,” or SCIF, which is the term for a room where sensitive national security information can be shared, the official said.
Another senior aide, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity, said it was Trump’s idea to hold the meeting at the White House.

“I heard this came from Trump himself, that in a nutshell he said, ‘Why don’t we have them up here instead?’ ” the aide said.

The senior administration official confirmed that Trump offered the White House complex as a location and McConnell accepted.

Congressional staffers suggested that the briefing’s proximity to Trump would make it easy for him to “drop by” and perhaps take over the briefing.

The image of senators meeting with Trump at the White House on a top national security concern could be touted by the White House as a key moment in the run-up to Trump’s 100th day in office — a milestone that the president has mocked in recent days but that his administration is working aggressively to promote.
 

Xando

Member
I know that line is said often but considering how dated their technology is, and things like failed missile launches...Is it possible that maybe that particular assessment is one that has been weakened over the decades?

I'm not going to pretend to know the ins and outs of war and weaponry, but whenever I see video or pictures of NK's arsenal it looks busted as fuck...their war rooms look like something out of the 70s...something just seems really off.

I mean we can't just overwhelm them before they have a chance to retaliate in any kind of meaningful way?

If you read actual analysis on this topic you'll notice experts believe north korea would be able to fire 500k artillery rounds towards seoul within the first hour of a conflict. Even if they have old ass technology with artillery that already worked in WW1 and WW2 which can possibly be equipped with chemical rounds.

Imagine even 1% of these shells being equipped with sarin munition on a town like seoul.

Destroying all these positions before they can hit seoul is probably impossible considering some of them are also built into the mountains and reinforced with concrete which would require a lot of bunker busters.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
So its theatrics? Why am I not surprised?
Probably. Most likely. I mean, the Capital is actually built to handle secure briefings for large numbers of people. The White House is not. So if they're actively jumping through hoops to do it, you can bet it's at least part with the intention of using it to boost Trump's ego and/or create positive PR opportunities for him.
 
kJWYrH269RK8M.gif


The time has come gaf...order 66 is about to be executed
 

Zolo

Member
His 100 days is coming up. He is doing anything and everything to get a good report, but so far, its not looking good. The worst 100 days for any President since like the 1940's.

Who was worse in the 40's? I also imagine anything he does is going to be overshadowed by a government shutdown.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Here we go.

Tillerson to chair UN meeting on North Korea
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson plans on chairing a special meeting of the United Nations Security Council on North Korea this Friday in New York City, according to a spokesman.

“The D.P.R.K. [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] poses one of the gravest threats to international peace and security through its pursuit of nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other weapons of mass destruction as well as its other prohibited activities,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner said in a statement Monday.

“The meeting will give Security Council members an opportunity to discuss ways to maximize the impact of existing Security Council measures and show their resolve to respond to further provocations with appropriate new measures.”
Shades of Powell's UN visits ahead of the Iraq invasion, anyone?
 
This game is coming to an end.

I'm calling joint US/Chinese operations in NK at the next big provocation (nuke test, most likely).

US to provide air superiority, China to mop up with ground troops.

China has made great military advances and I'm sure are just itching to test operational ability against an enemy with limited modern capability. The Chinese will also get an inside look into US SOP in theatre as an intelligence gathering exercise.
 

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
This game is coming to an end.

I'm calling joint US/Chinese operations in NK at the next big provocation (nuke test, most likely).

US to provide air superiority, China to mop up with ground troops.

China has made great military advances and I'm sure are just itching to test operational ability against an enemy with limited modern capability. The Chinese will also get an inside look into US SOP in theatre as an intelligence gathering exercise.

I would be absolutely STUNNED if China was in any way interested in having the US do anything to assist them. At least not unless it makes China look like the superpower who saved the day in NK.
 

Beartruck

Member
This game is coming to an end.

I'm calling joint US/Chinese operations in NK at the next big provocation (nuke test, most likely).

US to provide air superiority, China to mop up with ground troops.

China has made great military advances and I'm sure are just itching to test operational ability against an enemy with limited modern capability. The Chinese will also get an inside look into US SOP in theatre as an intelligence gathering exercise.

A recent report came out that China is planning on hacking South Korea's missile defense systems. No way in hell are they helping Trump, they just tell him what he wants to hear.
 

Xando

Member
This game is coming to an end.

I'm calling joint US/Chinese operations in NK at the next big provocation (nuke test, most likely).

US to provide air superiority, China to mop up with ground troops.

China has made great military advances and I'm sure are just itching to test operational ability against an enemy with limited modern capability. The Chinese will also get an inside look into US SOP in theatre as an intelligence gathering exercise.
China is probably going to stay out of the conflict (maybe occupy the north once the US is done). Chinese east coast cities are in direct range of North Korean short/mid range missiles
 

4Tran

Member
This game is coming to an end.

I'm calling joint US/Chinese operations in NK at the next big provocation (nuke test, most likely).

US to provide air superiority, China to mop up with ground troops.

China has made great military advances and I'm sure are just itching to test operational ability against an enemy with limited modern capability. The Chinese will also get an inside look into US SOP in theatre as an intelligence gathering exercise.
China may not like North Korea all that much right now, but there's zero chance that they're going to help the US against them in any way. An American attack would ruin China's two main strategic goals in the region and it would make Xi Jinping very unhappy.
 

KingBroly

Banned
China is probably going to stay out of the conflict (maybe occupy the north once the US is done). Chinese east coast cities are in direct range of North Korean short/mid range missiles

China's probably told the US where all of NK's missile silos/test areas are.

They'll stay out of it while the US bombs the hell outta them.

They'll wag their finger in public and thank in private.
 

Snwaters

Member
If China assists in the attack it will be with two objectives in mind:

1) secure the nuclear weapons so they don't fall into unknown renegade hands, or the probably worse scenario (for them) of falling into South Korea's hands

2) Install a puppet government friendly to China. When NK falls, there is going to be a major humanitarian crisis anyway, but it will be worse if the peninsula unites under American sway.

So if the US makes a strike, China may have to intervene with ground troops/etc. just to prevent the above from happening.
 

Xando

Member
China's probably told the US where all of NK's missile silos/test areas are.

They'll stay out of it while the US bombs the hell outta them.

They'll wag their finger in public and thank in private.
China has no interest in toppling north korea or war on their border. Any US attack would leave them with thousands, possibly millions of refugees. Despite all the talk from Trump china still sees the US as a direct opponent for influence in Asia.

Infact i see china invading the north once the US has bombed them to hell and possibly annex the north like crimea or create a rogue state like donezk.
 

iammeiam

Member
I'm basically currently on edge waiting to see if pictures and reports of the conditions in the North Korean prison camps start popping up on the news. The photographs of Syria let Trump retaliate and get praised; if suddenly the horrible conditions in the labor camps becomes a heavily pushed news topic, it's going to seem suspiciously like setting up a situation where people will encourage an invasion to stop the atrocities. North Korea's posturing about weapons and tests and whatever are old news and won't really whip the US population into supporting an attack on them; but images of what goes on in the labor camps very well could.
 

4Tran

Member
China has no interest in toppling north korea or war on their border. Any US attack would leave them with thousands, possibly millions of refugees. Despite all the talk from Trump china still sees the US as a direct opponent for influence in Asia.

Infact i see china invading the north once the US has bombed them to hell and possibly annex the north like crimea or create a rogue state like donezk.
The last thing that China wants is to share borders with a country that hosts American military bases. That, and taking over North Korea is way more trouble than it's worth, so they're going to be hands off. Compare that to the value of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, and it's really hard to see why anyone would want North Korea.

1) secure the nuclear weapons so they don't fall into unknown renegade hands, or the probably worse scenario (for them) of falling into South Korea's hands
South Korea is going to be the power that's most against American military intervention so that's very unlikely to happen. Besides, even if nuclear weapons fell into their hands, they'd just hand them over to the US for disposal. If South Korea had wanted nuclear weapons, they could have developed them a long time ago.
 
If China assists in the attack it will be with two objectives in mind:
1) secure the nuclear weapons so they don't fall into unknown renegade hands, or the probably worse scenario (for them) of falling into South Korea's hands
2) Install a puppet government friendly to China. When NK falls, there is going to be a major humanitarian crisis anyway, but it will be worse if the peninsula unites under American sway.
So if the US makes a strike, China may have to intervene with ground troops/etc. just to prevent the above from happening.

ahm... you might wanna have a look at SK's largest trading partner, since that tends to influence quite a bit which country has the most sway over another.

It aint the US, btw.

Chine already has massive sway over SK, is wot im saying.
 

Xando

Member
The last thing that China wants is to share borders with a country that hosts American military bases. That, and taking over North Korea is way more trouble than it's worth, so they're going to be hands off. Compare that to the value of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, and it's really hard to see why anyone would want North Korea.
Which is why they either annex it and use it as buffer land or create a buffer state that is defacto under chinese control.
The worst possible option for china is a unified korea with close ties to the US.
 

4Tran

Member
ahm... you might wanna have a look at SK's largest trading partner, since that tends to influence quite a bit which country has the most sway over another.

It aint the US, btw.

Chine already has massive sway over SK, is wot im saying.
The ideal outcome for China would probably be a unified Korea controlled from Seoul, and for the new unified Korea to get rid of the American military bases.

Which is why they either annex it and use it as buffer land or create a buffer state that is defacto under chinese control.
The worst possible option for china is a unified korea with close ties to the US.
As long as the military bases are gone, I don't think that China would care about close ties. Buffer states are a bit passe now, and I don't think China wants the bother of dealing with them.
 
The ideal outcome for China would probably be a unified Korea controlled from Seoul, and for the new unified Korea to get rid of the American military bases.

Maybe. Or the ideal outcome for China would be a Chinese-occupied North Korean state that eventually is annexed under One-China imperialism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom