Only way I could be excited about Fallout 4 is if Bethesda isn't developing it.
Hell, I'd even settle for co-developed with Obsidian.
But I know that's not gonna happen, and rather than a CRPG with excellent writing, dialogue, world reactivity and interesting quests, we're just gonna get "you see that irradiated mountain??? you can GO there!".
Yeah, I'm still salty as fuck at what Bethesda did to the Fallout IP.
Wasteland 2 (which I totally plan on getting).
And honestly I like what Bethesda did (well gameplay wise. I like what Obsidian did better but that was refining on what Bethesda did). And I am totally enjoying Fallout 2 right now.
Honestly, I wouldn't be upset if they also put out some turn based Fallouts as well (with better writing of course since they don't need to put as much resources into the technical part of the game). But I wouldn't want to get rid of "new school" fallout. I like the old Fallouts (and yes, I did actually try to play Fallout 1 at least before the new school so this isn't cause I'm used to the new one) but I definitely prefer new style better (and I think I prefer 2 to 1).
Why do we have to like one or the other honestly? I mean I have preferences but I think both type games were good. But I really love exploration and new school Fallout is way better for that (I love even travelling in between areas and having to look out for stuff. Old school fallout it was watching a line and wondering if you got an encounter. Wasn't that thrilling until the encounter).
Plus honestly you have Wasteland 2 if you want another old school Fallout like game (and 2 seems to be doing well so I am wondering if there will be a 3rd). It's not like a post apocalypse CRPG made recently doesn't exist
. And bonus, it was the original (Wasteland 1 was what inspired Fallout).