We have people refusing to play games because of a damn launcher app, and I'M the one that needs to get over myself?
DerFuggler
et al are REALLY showing EA who is boss by foregoing games they otherwise would want to play because GOD FORBID they allocate 0.02% of their SSD space to a client. "Eat away at performance and HDD" lmao get outta here. You people have lost your damn minds.
Y'know, the argument could be made that the proliferation of all these chromium or electron based launchers is a bad thing. As attractive as it is to tempt devs with "hey you can use your existing web store stack to build an app super fast", these web browser based frameworks by and large are not well designed for this. Constant background CPU time for no sane reason, though I assume it is connection upkeep and GC, lower overhead tech still exists. I'm just sitting on the library page, uPlay, why are you fucking about and using significant CPU time? Discord, you're not even visible or doing anything, keep it down, eh? Origin, the launcher related to this topic, thankfully, is relatively well behaved.
Sorry, a bit of a rant there.
For PC gamers, a group that will split hairs over small percentage differences in CPU brands, how is this different? Bloat is bloat, less is more - it all adds up and will impact your gameplay in CPU limited situations. I haven't even mentioned RAM requirements. Never just about a singular issue, performance in this case, either.
I have other launchers than just Steam. I'm drowning in good games to play, for me it really isn't any skin off my nose to skip some or wait.
These wide sweeping statements are just so weak.