spartan30gr
Member
No.
The user of this rumor seems to have had information via an internal 2K source.
Thank god for that.
No.
The user of this rumor seems to have had information via an internal 2K source.
Bioshock 2 wasn’t as good as Bioshock 1. So, I’m gonna be skeptical of all of this.
I'd love a bioshock 3 and this to be true. I'd definitely do a run through of the other games if this is legit as I never played the dlc in the second one and brought the remaster some time ago but never got around to playing it all again.
Pleeease be true!!!!
I prefer Bioshock 1 and Infinite (3) to 2.Bioshock 2 wasn’t as good as Bioshock 1. So, I’m gonna be skeptical of all of this.
We’ve all been calling the existing titles “1, 2 and 3”, so I guess we better stop and call the third one “Infinite” and the fourth one “3”
A simultaneous sequel to both 2 and Infinite. This could be good if true, but the GAAS already feels a bit off-putting. I want to like this though, so I think I'll just wait for both official confirmation and clarification on what this will actually mean to me as a gamer before I can make a decision.
Make me need this, 2K. The ball's in your court.
I never played Bioshock 2 until recently, but I agree. Everyone hypes it as the best in the series but I don't get why?
Two was the beginning of the shooting gallery crap that ruined Infinite.
I never played Bioshock 2 until recently, but I agree. Everyone hypes it as the best in the series but I don't get why?
Two was the beginning of the shooting gallery crap that ruined Infinite.
One antagonist was better. The other one was complete garbage.2 improved the gameplay of the original by allowing you to dual wield. It also had better level design. The original had superior atmosphere and better antagonists.
Nah. Who the fuck wants to play as a big daddy the entire game? Yawn.One antagonist was better. The other one was complete garbage.
Bioshock 1 is great the first playthrough but once you know the twist there's not much else to the game. Which is why 2 is superior.
it doesn't sound like you are going to return to rapture? the setting has always been the main draw to bioshock and the next game takes place in... london?
Bioshock 2 is highly overrated, it's absurd to call it the best of the series.
All the games are overrated. It fits right in with infinite and 1!Bioshock 2 is highly overrated, it's absurd to call it the best of the series.
Bioshock 1 was decent and unique, Bioshock Infinite is a bad game, imo, it might have killed the series.
Nothing against London but the setting sounds really tame and boring compared to Columbia and Rapture. Maybe something major happens that changes up everything?
I love Bioshock 2. It did take awhile to get into. I was like, I'm a Big Daddy and these peons are attacking me?
But it gets really deep with a high variety of powers and perks.
If all you did was the combat, you are missing out.
I loved throwing out multiple security bots, hypnotizing a Big Daddy or Brute and calling a Big Sister in.
Maybe Eleanor becomes some leader in the UK or something to that effect. I'm on the fence on London though, We Happy Few already exists and is somewhat similar. Good to speculate though. Any Bioshock news is welcome.
"The Rapture dream is over, but in waking I am reborn. This world is not ready for me, yet here I am. It would be so easy to misjudge them. You are my conscience father, and I need you to guide me. You will always be with me now, father, your memories, your drives. And when I need you, you'll be there on my shoulder whispering. If Utopia is not a place, but a people, then we must choose carefully, for the world is about to change, and in our story, Rapture was just the beginning "
So announcement at game awards I would guess. Michael Condrey comes out on stage.
If Ken Levine is not involved then I'll only have a passing interest. #gaming-snob
Nah. Who the fuck wants to play as a big daddy the entire game? Yawn.
Not only that but you never really felt like a Big Daddy since your movement speed was normal and you could sue Plasmids, so they couldn't even commit to the big central gimmick of the game.
Everything in the game felt like making a sequel for the sake of a sequel with no real inspiration, like what if this time, there were Big Sisters instead of just Big Daddies!? Or what if the villain espoused the polar opposite mindset of Ryan!? It all felt very hackneyed.
One antagonist was better. The other one was complete garbage.
Bioshock 1 is great the first playthrough but once you know the twist there's not much else to the game. Which is why 2 is superior.
1) so how does one live "as an apartment thief". like what actually does that mean?
I mean...I'd play it. Sounds kind of like Bioshock x Dishonored. But I'm not exactly thirsting for another Bioshock game, would rather something original.
Isn't it underrated?Bioshock 2 is highly overrated, it's absurd to call it the best of the series.
Infinite is a prequel, in the end.
So, when the future Bioshock 3 comes out, Bioshock Infinite will have to be called Bioshock 1 prequel by people, and not the third chapter.
How about Infinite is Bioshock 0.
Or maybe Bioshock 00 to represent its multiverse nature.
or maybe Bioshock P00 to represent Ken Levine's bowel movementHow about Infinite is Bioshock 0.
Or maybe Bioshock 00 to represent its multiverse nature.
I can't wait. I hope they keep what's great about the franchise (mainly the story).
Got the plats for 1, 2 and working on Infinite.
Looking forward to it ! the original is in my favorite Top 10 games of all time ! i enjoyed the 2nd one too and i even finished the awesome multiplayer !
I played BioShock and its sequel but missed out on Infinite. I don't actually remember much about BioShock 2 but the original is definitely a classic. Nonetheless, I'm curious to see what BioShock 3 would be like. Maybe I'm alone here but I don't really understand why London is considered a boring setting for video games.
I don't want to read the details for a rumor in case it turns out to be false, don't want to get hyped for nothing, but please for the love of god make any inclusion of Rapture be brief like Infinite did. While 2 had very solid gameplay, I was bored with the environment and such because part of Rapture's charm in 1 was discovering a whole new world I'd never seen before. So just throwing me back in again in 2 was unappealing to me. Levine didn't work on 2 from what I understand and had said the series was always supposed to have a new setting for each game so I was happy he gave us that was Infinite. Hopefully a 4th Bioshock game respects his vision.