No?
Correct, it was 49% owned by Nintendo, since the Stampers wanted to retain ownership. But that 49% entitled Nintendo to part-ownership of games made during their relationship and beyond. I'll point to the 360 GoldenEye 007 situation again.
If you're going to continue to make broad assumptions on my part then I'm simply going to leave you to have an uninformed debate with yourself.
It sold like shit and has been dead for 6 years would be my guess.
Smh...did you even read that post? This is why you need to read man. The point was that if Nintendo was the reason why its crowd funded, it would only support that number 4 as it would be Nintendo's idea, thus would likely be their IP involved as its the only way to support that Nitnendo had some deal where it HAD to be crowd sourced. They have no done enough games for Nintendo for them to tell them ALL 4 GAMES must be done this way, unless its referring to Baoyonetta 2, 3 etc. Which wouldn't make sense considering one of them isn't even out.
Thus...if it was Nintendo, then part of those other 3 announcements could be Star Fox Zero, Guard or Astral Chain. NEVER did I state that IP going mulitplatform, you either can't read, or you didn't fully read or understand what was being stated. You ASSUMED it was asking or saying they'd put it on many systems.
Where on earth did I say that? smh.
READ THE POST! Stop cherry picking to emotionally rage post...
Here is the post I'm responding to and the FULL POST!
"Something about this arrangement with Nintendo predating the cash influx by Tencent. If I had to guess they have a contract that laid out exactly how the funding would be acquired, including how much was needed for steam and ps4."
"Maybe, could be, but consider it has 3 other announcements. So why would Nintendo have an arrangement for them to get funding this way on those other 3 games we don't know about? So even if we look all the games they did for Nintendo that are THEIR games, that only applies to Wonderful 101 and Astral Chain, even if we squeeze in Bayonetta 2 and for some reason Nintendo and not Sega has for it to be funded this way, it still leaves out a 4th game. So I don't know that this has anything to do with Nintendo as I don't know what they'd make some clause to them have them port other titles thru crowd funding as this number 4 would apply to 3 games, that of which clearly Nintendo had no part of.
I could agree with you that maybe Nintendo has something to do with it being funded this way if it was JUST this game, but 3 others?
Another way to look at it is if Nintendo themselves didn't want to fund some port. Lets say you are right and Nintendo makes them crowd source, it means they have something to do with those other 3 titles, if so...it could be Star Fox Zero, Guard and Astral Chain"
No where does it state anything about Star Fox going multiplatform bud, its stating that if the game is on kickstarer because of some arrangement by Nintendo , it likely means its cause it involves their IP or stuff they've published. So....if the person who questioned that feels Nintendo maybe had some deal where it MUST be Kickstarter, it means the other 3 games clearly have to do with that actual deal.
No where did I say anything about Star Fox going multiplatform, you just rage post too much and don't read enough of people's post.
You fight and assume too much..
S
sid2vicious
Pretty much, I expect Astral Chain next tbh