Graphics Horse
Member
What the heck is Nontendo? They hire Capcom's proofreaders?
I assume that's deliberate because they're games within the game.
edit: bleh
What the heck is Nontendo? They hire Capcom's proofreaders?
I find this really gross. F2P isn't necessarily bad but when the entire appeal of the game is based around paying for additional content, and the main draw is that you have a way to pay less for it by playing it "right". I just find it gross.
If MS did this on the Xbox or an app developer did this on IOS they would be raked across the coals, and rightly so , but somehow. It gets a pass since it's on a Nintendo system.
It's pretty inoffensive.
I agree the implementation isn't anywhere near the same as the crap we see in other games. From what I understand it is basically a given that you will haggle to reduce the price.
However, at that point you have to question why they put it into the game at all? Like instead of making it $4, why not have him say "I can't part with it. I won't! I love this game too much!" and then you have to have the right item to trade / haggle with in order for him to even offer to sell it to you (at an already reduced price).
I agree the implementation isn't anywhere near the same as the crap we see in other games. From what I understand it is basically a given that you will haggle to reduce the price.
However, at that point you have to question why they put it into the game at all? Like instead of making it $4, why not have him say "I can't part with it. I won't! I love this game too much!" and then you have to have the right item to trade / haggle with in order for him to even offer to sell it to you (at an already reduced price).
I agree the implementation isn't anywhere near the same as the crap we see in other games. From what I understand it is basically a given that you will haggle to reduce the price.
However, at that point you have to question why they put it into the game at all? Like instead of making it $4, why not have him say "I can't part with it. I won't! I love this game too much!" and then you have to have the right item to trade / haggle with in order for him to even offer to sell it to you (at an already reduced price).
The same reason stores perpetually have X% off sales on their items. Everyone likes to feel like they got a deal.
Thanks for this. I had read this a few months ago (I was curious because there is a Japan-only Mii Plaza puzzle for it) but it didn't fully make sense to me at the time.The thread from a gaffer with impressions that got me interested in the game
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=646895
Somehow this totally connects with me. This game looks extremely fun. I might be more excited for this than any of the titles in the presentation. I can't wait to hear that perfect crack of the bat.The good feelings of baseball.And talking down prices
Except retail sales can eat the cost, if it gives them more traffic. The game cannot, the game has a programmed price that it can not go lower than. The game also displays a price higher than that with the implication that you won't be able to get the "sale " price. Thus the game is attempting to rip you off. I don't know about you but I don't get "good feels" when I learn I paid 30% more for DLC because the game let me.
This comment makes no sense to me. The main appeal of the game is that it is a mini-game collection with actual gameplay. The haggling thing is just a pricing model. Instead of charging $30 up front, it is free to start and then the remaining content is sold in sections. The difference between this and the F2P titles frequently derided by GAF is that you are paying for actual content and not just 'new hats' or 'coins'. And, even better, the game is structured so that you are incentivised to actually complete the content that you have already purchased before purchasing new content. In that sense this is the anti-F2P title. You can't 'whale' this.I find this really gross. F2P isn't necessarily bad but when the entire appeal of the game is based around paying for additional content, and the main draw is that you have a way to pay less for it by playing it "right". I just find it gross.
If MS did this on the Xbox or an app developer did this on IOS they would be raked across the coals, and rightly so , but somehow. It gets a pass since it's on a Nintendo system.
Interesting that they gave Rusty a makeover from the JPN version.
Why do you say that? I think this is a million times better than the usual F2P stuff where you have to buy coins or gems or whatever to keep playing, which then run out.This is the Free 2play stuff people should really not like.
If you scroll up you will see that this topic has been well discussed in this thread.This is the Free 2play stuff people should really not like.
The altered design kind of kills the appeal a bit. But I guess they didn't think western audiences would get the kansai salesman trope, so no point making him look Japanese. He looks more like a steve buscemi pawn shop owner now, so not really as sympathetic. Still interested in the game though, because it looks like fun.
Got the first game, Bat and Switch, for 2$ (50% off after haggling). Prices are still a bit too high, 1$ a game is more realistic. I'm not sure if I'll get another.
Some of the gaffers who wrote about the Japanese version last summer said that they were able to get get some of the games down to ¥ 150 from the original price of ¥ 400 but it looks like the general experience is that you can get them down to half of the original price by normal means.So $2 seems to be the lowest so far? Downloaded the main game & gonna see if I can give some of them a try over the weekend.
A little comparison between Inuji Darumeshi and Rusty:
![]()
![]()
Localization of Daraumashi (sp?) Sports Shop. Just announced in the most recent Nintendo Direct.
Baseball minigames hosted by a former baseball star dog. Free demos when downloaded, but you can buy the other games for $4.00 (each, I think). Or you can haggle the prices down to an unknown amount.
Looks fun to me, and it's always good to see new Nintendo IP's get some spotlight.
Comes out in April.
If you scroll up you will see that this topic has been well discussed in this thread.
I am generally happy with the pricing structure. This isn't pay to win or pay for trinkets, it's a mini-game market that allows you to purchase additional games. And the games rewards you with real-world discounts if you make progress through the existing games before purchasing new ones (this is the way the haggling mechanic works out in practice as far as I can tell).
That said, I would personally prefer to buy it in one go but I'm not complaining. This is an interesting experiment and, if I end up not liking it, I will have saved some money.
Nintendo has made mini-game collections before. I'm not sure if I understand your objection. Are you opposed to the entire genre? Or did you simply play this already and you don't like it? In either case, I don't see what this has to do with your original post about this being F2P.None of these little games are worth a dollar. This is a dollar product being sold piece meal and sold a major mark up and making people think they are getting a deal as part of the "game"; garbage.