So are there like poor kids who have no other choice but to use the chromebooks to do their school work? I can see this being feigned as a way to increase the student's ability to access the internet, but instead locking many students without a choice in the matter to their fucked up surveillance fetishes.
So my fiance is a high school English teacher for a poor inner city school, the worst school in one of the poorest school systems in the state. The majority of her students do not have computers or internet at home. Most have new(ish) smartphones because it's a status thing, but very few households have computers or a typical internet connection. The result is that if she wants to prepare some of her kids for college who will go, she can only assign typed papers that they use class time to type in the computer labs at school, which sucks because it takes away class time.
Prior to the school she is at now, she was at one of the wealthiest public schools in the state, and every student submitted their papers via Google Docs... which was amazing, even for me (somebody who works in tech), I was pretty impressed by the system. She could live edit a draft of a paper with a student at night, and was available for chat through whatever the Google Apps for School Hangouts app is. This school's use of technology was better than both of our college's. That's something that could really help any student.
So you doubt it would happen... because it's happened before? When the OP stated that the school district specifically informed them that they reserved the right to do so?
Okay then.
And pet issue? I've made three total posts on it in my many years posting on GAF. But, yes, it's a pet issue.
A school district lost a class action suit for exactly what the OP is mentioning. Believe it or not, when school systems implement system-wide, multi-million dollar funding initiatives for programs like this, they look at past successes and failures. So yes, because a past school district did this -- in 2010 -- and was brought to court and lost because of it I'd feel that future school systems probably wouldn't institute this home surveillance policy. Plus, you have to admit that the world in 2015 takes online and personal privacy much more seriously than it did in 2010 (or earlier).
The surveillance thing really sounds like one of those high school myths that students make up because they heard a teacher tell a friend from an aid that the principle is using the computer to monitor them at home.