• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Senate's McConnell says Obamacare repeal high on agenda.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kathian

Banned
I mean the fee hike meant even Dems would be forced to change it eventually. Its a bad system to a terrible problem. Better to strengthen State rights on health care.
 
I actually think that what they'll likely do is "replace Obamacare" with something that looks like it but under a different name, so they can take credit for it. Obamacare was originally a Republican idea, it's private-market driven, companies are making money on it. Philosophically, there's nothing toxic about it to Republicans, but it doesn't have their brand on it.

22 Republican governors refused to implement the Medicaid expansion because that was good politics, not because it helped their electorate or served the public interest. It could actually happen that, because the "solution" has an R on it, this logjam gets broken.
 
I actually think that what they'll likely do is "replace Obamacare" with something that looks like it but under a different name, so they can take credit for it. Obamacare was originally a Republican idea, it's private-market driven, companies are making money on it. Philosophically, there's nothing toxic about it to Republicans, but it doesn't have their brand on it.

22 Republican governors refused to implement the Medicaid expansion because that was good politics, not because it helped their electorate or served the public interest. It could actually happen that, because the "solution" has an R on it, this logjam gets broken.

I could actually see that happening and their voters not questioning it at all and just eating it up.
 
I actually think that what they'll likely do is "replace Obamacare" with something that looks like it but under a different name, so they can take credit for it. Obamacare was originally a Republican idea, it's private-market driven, companies are making money on it. Philosophically, there's nothing toxic about it to Republicans, but it doesn't have their brand on it.

22 Republican governors refused to implement the Medicaid expansion because that was good politics, not because it helped their electorate or served the public interest. It could actually happen that, because the "solution" has an R on it, this logjam gets broken.

I've thought about this, and I could see it happening, and that's very annoying. (but I can also see them going down a much worse route)
 

TheMan

Member
serious question- have ANY of these GOP assholes put forth anything resembling a plan that will replace obamacare?
 

jwhit28

Member
Pre existing condition clause, along with no maximum lifetime limits and parents keeping their kids on their plan HAVE to be preserved

It's impossible. Insurance premiums are rising dramatically because despite healthy people being forced to pick up insurance or be fined, they still can't offset all of the unhealthy people actually using their insurance.

So how do you account for those sick people when the healthy ones drop their insurance?
 

AndyD

aka andydumi
Ok, that's a potential scenario. But given the real one that I'm currently facing where my coverage is prohibitively expensive and getting more so, I can't say I am happy with Obamacare. I never once experienced a hike this severe on my old insurance.

The costs have always been going up, even pre-Obamacare. It has not caused costs to go up due to its requirements, in large part the increase is due to pharmaceuticals costs skyrocketing since about 2013 and Congress unwillingness to do anything about it.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/09/22/new-data-show-slow-health-care-cost-growth-continuing
 

Ferrio

Banned
I actually think that what they'll likely do is "replace Obamacare" with something that looks like it but under a different name, so they can take credit for it. Obamacare was originally a Republican idea, it's private-market driven, companies are making money on it. Philosophically, there's nothing toxic about it to Republicans, but it doesn't have their brand on it.

22 Republican governors refused to implement the Medicaid expansion because that was good politics, not because it helped their electorate or served the public interest. It could actually happen that, because the "solution" has an R on it, this logjam gets broken.

I've been certain for awhile that this is the real motive behind this. They didn't want Dems and especially one under a Black president having the claim that they brought healthcare to people who couldn't afford it. They want to be able to claim that, from 8 years down the line to 100+ years down the line just like they do with "Party of Lincoln".
 

Chumly

Member
Pre existing condition clause, along with no maximum lifetime limits and parents keeping their kids on their plan HAVE to be preserved
Do people actually believe these are going to be preserved? Preexisting conditions that is. Insurance will be so high per month nobody is going to be able to afford it
 

br3wnor

Member
As a cancer survivor, I will probably have to close my business, this was the only way I could be insured. Maybe can get it through my wife, but that's 2x as expensive as my exchange plan, and since it's via her adjunct university gig, is tenuous.

Feels bad man. Cancer survivor as well and while I have employer based insurance, god forbid I ever get sick and laid off or I can't go on my wife's insurance, I'm fucked. So as long as I stay employed I'll be ok but it'll be fun to have no safety net available if something unexpected happens in my life.

Pre existing condition clause, along with no maximum lifetime limits and parents keeping their kids on their plan HAVE to be preserved

It can't. Without forcing healthy people to buy insurance, you cannot insure people with pre-existing conditions. The pool of sick people will be outweighed by the pool of healthy people and it won't remain profitable for insurance companies. Kids staying on the plan might stick around but that's best case scenario. Pre-existing condition coverage and no lifetime limits are gone as soon as the insurance companies get the green light to axe them.
 

SapientWolf

Trucker Sexologist
I agree. But the ACA itself did nothing to change that, either. In fact, it exacerbated those issues by mandating everyone to buy a plan and for these companies (who are still going to profit) to provide them.
Those mandates are the only leverage people had. Some of the plans before the law changes were downright predatory.
 

bender

What time is it?
Trust me, your premiums will continue to rise.

You should always expect your premiums to rise as you are always getting older. At what rate should be questioned. The last two years of the ACA have been ridiculous and came with a reduction in coverage plans/options as well as reduced amount of health care providers. I'm all for universal health care but the system needs to be built from the ground up and not legislation slapped on top of an already dysfunctional system. Losing protection for people with pre-existing conditions is terrible though.
 
I hope in four years liberal people won't be so stupid and elect someone that can improve Obamacare by stopping private companies from being able to profit from people getting hurt.
 

daveo42

Banned
I hate to say this, but after what I saw what my new premium will be next year on the ACA (67% monthly increase ), I won't miss it too much. Hopefully Trump truly does replace it with "Something better"

Hope you like high deductible HSA insurance plans. I mean, sure you get tax free savings for medical bills but you're paying full price for even a basic doctor's visit until you hit that $3-$6k deductible. Also, you get the benefit of still paying a premium for it.
 
Good luck with that.

People will just scream "SOCIALISM!" at the top of their lungs and keep it from happening.

Fuck Joe Lieberman for killing any chance of Universal Healthcare.

I'm not sure people will be able to afford to complain when automation takes over nearly every industry.
 
You should always expect your premiums to rise as you are always getting older. At what rate should be questioned. The last two years of the ACA have been ridiculous and came with a reduction in coverage plans/options as well as reduced amount of health care providers. I'm all for universal health care but the system needs to be built from the ground up and not legislation slapped on top of an already dysfunctional system. Losing protection for people with pre-existing conditions is terrible though.
That's fair but I'd rather have failing Obamacare than to go back to where we were.
 

jwhit28

Member
Hope you like high deductible HSA insurance plans. I mean, sure you get tax free savings for medical bills but you're paying full price for even a basic doctor's visit until you hit that $3-$6k deductible. Also, you get the benefit of still paying a premium for it.

I'm pretty sure this is what they do with the healthy parts of those 20 million people. Send them an application for a savings account and then brag about how they kept them covered
 

mrmickfran

Member
Trump will just spend the next 8 years undoing everything that Obama has done.

And then the guy after him will bring all of Obama's plans back in place.

And after that, another Republican undoing everything the last guy did.

It's an endless cycle.
 

slit

Member
Pre existing condition clause, along with no maximum lifetime limits and parents keeping their kids on their plan HAVE to be preserved

But how does that happen without the mandate? The insurance industry would be out of business in a year. The only thing they can do is take the mandate out and go back to business as usual.
 
Filibuster is going to be a key weapon here.

Reps will try to use reconciliation but a lot of this can't be done.

If they nuke the filibuster, we'll have to see how that shakes out....
 

graffix13

Member
Good. I supported this at first, but these rising costs are too much now. Blow it up, restructure it...Idgaf. It needs to go.
 

slit

Member
Good. I supported this at first, but these rising costs are too much now. Blow it up, restructure it...Idgaf. It needs to go.

I mean I'm honestly fine with it going, but I'd like to know what the alternative is except UHC which is NEVER going to happen with this congress.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
I mean the fee hike meant even Dems would be forced to change it eventually. Its a bad system to a terrible problem. Better to strengthen State rights on health care.

People need to quit pushing this narrative. Its a perfectly reasonable system given our situation as a country and the healthcare infrastructure in place. Its not ideal, but it is a foundation that can be worked with.


Problem is Republicans have(rightly) assumed that the complexities of the bill will allow them to get away with actively undermining it in ways that directly raised costs of the ACA and they will not be punished as much for obstructionism as their opponents will for the outcomes of the policies they passed. Even though they are playing a key role in its failure.

They helped gut the ACA with faux attempts and consensus, then vilified to the point of toxicity, defunded aspects of the bill that would help reduce risk and help the marketplaces adjust to new issues through technocratic means.
 
This is going to be a nightmare for small business. One of my buddies has a three employees and they are all on Obamacare. There's no other way for him to ensure them and stay in business. In the past he's said if it was ever repealed, he'd have to lay everyone off and go back to being a sole proprietor.
 

NateDrake

Member
No shit

Obamacare was flawed (partly bc of republican obstructionism), fixing it or implementing a better plan is the way forward. Republicans will do neither.

That's the thing. It became what it was due to compromises pushed by the GOP. Maybe they'll make something better for everyone (I hope they do), but I don't have hope for it.
 

bender

What time is it?
That's fair but I'd rather have failing Obamacare than to go back to where we were.

Selfishly I'd rather be where we were. My first 10 years with my provider saw my premiums double over that period of time (getting old sucks). My first year in ACA gave me a worse plan with a 25% premium hike. This year my provider is no longer available and to get a similar plan to what I had just this past year would nearly double costs. Luckily I can afford that now but that wouldn't have been untenable three years ago.

Unselfishly I'd hate to see people denied insurance for pre-existing conditions and see the return of lifetime maximums

Realistically the genie is out of the bottle. Even repealing Obamacare isn't going to return premiums to what they were or what they should have been if they'd continued to follow pre-Obamacare trends.

We'll never get the reform we need because starting from scratch would sacrifice hundreds of thousands of jobs in the US. Just look at the results of Prop 69 in Colorado (where I live) which was easily defeated. I just don't think you can make something affordable that has so many hands in cookie jar.
 

Fox318

Member
Pre existing condition clause, along with no maximum lifetime limits and parents keeping their kids on their plan HAVE to be preserved

Kids keeping on their parents plan is gonna get kicked off. Companies want younger healthy people to pay for older overweight baby boomers.

If you work for a company with an older workforce you can't use your younger employees to try and place a bid.

Its dead.
 
Kids keeping on their parents plan is gonna get kicked off. Companies want younger healthy people to pay for older overweight baby boomers.

If you work for a company with an older workforce you can't use your younger employees to try and place a bid.

Its dead.
That and college loans not being refinanced basically means I'm gonna be an indentured servant the rest of my life.


Thanks Trump.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
I hate to say this, but after what I saw what my new premium will be next year on the ACA (67% monthly increase ), I won't miss it too much. Hopefully Trump truly does replace it with "Something better"


Good. I supported this at first, but these rising costs are too much now. Blow it up, restructure it...Idgaf. It needs to go.

And this my friends, is the Republican's strategy since 2009 with the ACA bearing the fruit they wanted.



....Obstruct, undermine, vilify, harm and actively help raise costs on the back end and then put the blame at the feet of the Democrats and Obama.

Watch as Democrats eat their own as they don't understand the mechanisms that have led to this that Republicans are largely culpable for, even look to Republicans to save them, while Republicans rally around its repeal and let in-fighting Democrats weaken themselves.

The more i read liberals talking about the ACA, the more I think Republicans repealing it, passing an almost identical bill that incorporates Paul Ryan's Medicare reform(which ironically is largely Obamacare for medicare) but with fixes they obstructed, stronger penalties, worthless Republican talking points they know won't do anything like malpractice caps, HC savings accounts, selling across state lines - and of course plenty industry cash grabs - and then selling it to the American people as TrumpCare seems more and more plausible to me.
 
People will lose healthcare. Millions of them. People that were already at risk and many will die.

You are replacing $2,000 premiums for not-eligible can't buy premiums

It would be funny if it wasn't so terrible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom