BigKaboom2 said:Likely true, but you're ignoring my original point about not knowing whether the amount of money he receives is correlated to the sales of the game or was always going to be the same regardless.
Doesn't matter. Really, it's about principle at this point. Whether I pay for an entire trip for him and his friends to go influence politicians in Washington or just a bag of peanuts on the flight I feel the same.
BigKaboom2 said:They don't deserve to be rewarded for making any old game - they deserve to be rewarded for making a game that you personally find to be worth the price, that you find sufficiently interesting, and that you can comfortably afford. They've done all the requisite work to make something that appeals to you (this is the generic 'you,' not you in particular) but you've thrown all that out the window because your 1 or 2 cents MIGHT go to someone in the Special Thanks section that you disagree with.
They made one decision I disagree with. That's it. What difference does it make if that decision was about gameplay or this OSC business? You may not deem it important. You are not me.
BigKaboom2 said:Of course it's my choice. I choose to monetarily support people's right to express themselves if they're providing services or goods that I find valuable. I don't fantasize about people falling into financial ruin just because they disagree with me.
That makes two of us. You should really phrase those in the form of a question, unless straw men are a fetish of yours.